Tram writes:
But yet, science laws teach only scientific opinions in school. What makes scientific opinions more right to teach our children than religion?
Well that is a good question - What does make one opinion superior to another? Facts maybe? Evidential validity? Being based on demonstrably successful investigative methods? Or are you suggesting all opinions no matter how baseless or even evidence defying are equally valid? What should we be teaching our kids if we want them to genuinely think critically?
Tram writes:
And wouldn't free speech also apply to creationists as well?
Nobody is denying free speech to creationists.
Tram writes:
Why should science be taught in schools under the guise of free speech when creationism is not taught in schools under free speech.
Science is taught under the "guise" of science. Religion should NOT be taught under the guise of science. Religion should be taught as religion.
™ Version 4.2