Hallo Minority Report
Minority report writes:
They are theories proposed by creation believing scientists,.
No, what scientists believe have no bearing on science. For example, nearly all Christian physicists, cosmologists, etc. have accepted the standard model. They also are "creation believing" scientists. Therefore I don’t see how the words creation believing can have anything to do with what we discuss in a science forum like this. What individual scientists believe or not doesn’t change science. It’s the empirical evidence that matters in science. Beliefs don’t.
Minority report writes:
. and are published in peer review journals such as TJ. That makes them scientific.
Nope. As has been pointed out to you, The Journal of Creation (formerly TJ) is nowhere near a scientific journal. It also is only ‘peer-reviewed’ by people with a fixed belief. A belief that will never change, regardless of whether the evidence contradicts their belief or not. Therefore a religious publication like TJ surely is not scientific. It is exactly the opposite of what a scientific journal is.
I asked for peer-reviewed scientific journals in Message 44:
Pressie writes:
Could you give us a description of what they described, as I can’t find any of their research in peer-reviewed scientific publications.
You know that peer-reviewed scientific journals are the way research is distributed amongst relevant scientists where they can critique an article and accept or reject the findings? Without publishing in peer-reviewed scientific journals, relevant scientists don't even know about those articles to critique them. The scientific community can therefore not reach any kind of consensus about them. Therefore it can never even be called science.
Then you continue:
Minority report writes:
Because they are physicists who have or have had a paid day job to do physics.
No, any person who doesn’t follow the scientific method, doesn’t do science. The examples you provided were of two people who stopped using the scientific method when they wrote those so-called articles. They would therefore be classified as pseudo-scientists in the real world. That’s it.
Would you please answer the questions posted by Butterflytyrant?
Edited by Pressie, : Changed spelling
Edited by Pressie, : More spelling mistakes
Edited by Pressie, : Changed a sentence
Edited by Pressie, : No reason given.