Summations Only

quote:

---

I had not realized that our average life span has increased some 44% since 1950.

---

Knock-knock! This aligns only with my premise.

quote:

---

Before we find a new place to park our own numbers will kill us

---

You said it. We need new parking plots instead of destroying cars.

quote:

---

Genesis has been disproved in so many ways

---

If you want to debate that point instead of why securing other lands outside earth has no alternative, then you have to include some examples of your vacant claim. I can give maybe 50,000 factual stats of the ancient world which says Genesis is not mythical and that there is no other writings anyplace with more non-mythical, scientfically verified stats. Its called intellectual honety - not to be confused with your post which lacks any content of credibility.

Would man have landed on the moon if one Kennedy didn't challenge humanity to go forth? That is what is needed now. Ths debate has been won - its another check mate, based on no credible defense outside of denial.Anyone wants to dabte the universe is finite or that humanity's future depends on following magestic laws of equality and inalianable human rights instead of magestic names!?

If someone says Genesis is myth, they have to give an example. I can list more than 50,000 stats and prove beyond any doubt there is no writings with more proof of historical credibility in existence any place.

It was not a snake, it never happened on earth, the universe & the earth according to Genesis is billions of years old [the text], the tower was not silly and speech endowed humans are under 6000. Keep reading Genesis according to those who never understood or observed it. Your kind of intellectual honesty.Genesis' intellectual honesty: the universe is finite, once no laws existed, all products are caused by laws and seperations, the first recorded name is Adam, the first listing of life form groupings in in Genesis, the oldest active calendar and the first alphabetical book is the Hebrew one and humanity will live by magestic laws.

quote:

---

Lets look at the facts.

---

This is not a trick question:Q. What is the use-by date of sustainable development and what then?

You are asking that I must 'PROVE' how man can land on the moon before it happened. My response is there is nothing stopping us from formulating a plan how a dome city can be established on the Lunar soil, and further this is incumbent for humanity. Your rejections are based on this not being possible and that it will not serve any purpose - both are bogus responses.The premise of dreaming this planet can house all life forever or that we need not concern ourselves about the assured future hurtlying our way is also a folly. The interim measures to accomodate humanity are just that - interim measures before a tsunami hits ground zero. Some 95% of humanity has a problem with the Hebrew bible for very obvious reasons - they fall into an abyss when they are exposed as wrong in their claims. This greatly impacts so-called atheists, agnostics and other worldly beliefs - they dump all their anxst against other theologies on the Hebrew bible. But the world turns by magestic laws found only in one document. There is no solution for humanity and all other life frms save for the advocation in Genesis. Thus:YOU SHALL NOT FOLLOW A CORRUPT MULTITUDE.Edited by IamJoseph, : No reason given.

quote:

---

There is no use by date.

---

Estimate the population of humanity and rabbits 500 years from now.

Well eccept radiation,This is covered by a protective dome.the cost of transportiong food to it,Most foods can be cultivated in controlled atmospheres.air,Imagine a dome sized space suit.power,Electricity is not limited to earth and can be harnessed anyplace.meteorites, .........Generic to all locations in the universe.

quote:

---

Your saying "Destroy the planet and then abandon ship for Mars".

---

The only solution for humanity and to save this planet is acquiring new additional lands to house 100s of 1000s of years sustainance and natural population increase. Not doing so will destroy humanity and all life on this planet.

It will be a first of 1000s of cities.

By nature I mean as per historical precedence. Afer all things are factored, the population will increase, unless a mass killing is instituted for humanity. Pther life forms are impacted differently.I do believe I have gone as far as needed with this thread, convinced that a deeply rooted fire wall exists whch negates any objectivity. I am witnessing a brand new religion emergent.

What happens to sustainable development if the population follows historical precedence rather than some nutty professors and doubles or trebles in 500 years? Why is there more confidence in your accepted predictions than what history says?

This is not a Plan B.Argument: According to United Nations' World Population Prospects 2004 Revision, the world's population will reach 9.1 billion by 2050, with India as the most populous nation, with a projected decline in fertility to slightly over 2 children per woman in 2050 (from 2.6 children in 2004). Even though the administrative system will be more efficient in the developing parts of the world by then, it will still be difficult to determine the exact number of people in the world.Questions: What affects on the world will the increase of the world?s population with almost 50% until 2050 have, which of course will be unprecedented in human history in number of people? Are there necessary steps that have to be taken to make sure that we for instance produce enough food for such a huge population?
http://www.newsoffuture.com/...illion_future_population.htmlThe total size of the world population is likely to increase from its current 7 billion to 8—10 billion by 2050. This uncertainty is because of unknown future fertility and mortality trends in different parts of the world. But the young age structure of the population and the fact that in much of Africa and Western Asia, fertility is still very high makes an increase by at least one more billion almost certain. Virtually, all the increase will happen in the developing world. http://rstb.royalsocietypublishing.org/...365/1554/2779.full