Your EvC Debate Dream Team - Fantasy Debating

Hi Chuck. This is not an EvC site perse. It is an E site. Don't ever expect to be belonging here.Effective (I say effective) creationists debating true creationism have never felt "belonged" here. Effective creationists debating true ID creationism should never come here expecting to be anywhere but in the bottom group.Nevertheless, for the most part, our secularist friends need and want us here. Whether not our counterparts realize or appreciate us, they need effective creationists here.

It was difficult and tacky for the minority representation on behalf of the creationist constituency to moderate the overwhelming majority membership. For this reason, most of my activity as moderator was behind the scenes in PAF.I was back there on behalf of all. I was the only moderator in PAF who advocated on behalf of NWR, for example, who never openly defied Admin in a defiant manner before his ouster.I was there also advocating on behalf of Faith and some other creationists from time to time. There were times when I would monitor problematic creationists by request of Admin.When I accepted the role of moderator I accepted with the understanding that my time was limited due to business and other activities.As for a creationist dream team, LoL. Creationism PoVs range all the way from Biblical literalists to evolutionists; hardly what would be needful for a dream team.I sometimes refer to myself as a Biblical literalistic creationist.For the above reason, perhaps this is why current creationist minded moderators don't appear to be advocating in or out of PAF on behalf of Biblical literalists.

Not at all, friend Froggy. All that keeps evolutionist sheeple from thinking for themselves is the fact that the secularistic evolution myth of chaos into order is programmed into their young minds full of mush all the way from pre-school through doctorate degree.Creationists think for themselves. We apply common sense and logic in arriving at our interpretations of observable evidence.

I would be game for for such a debate with my good brother ICANT.No doubt we could engage in such a debate in a friendly manner, airing our differences of what we consider to be the true Biblical applications of creationism.

Catholic school may be different than public school. but public school science has assumed evolution for a long time.Even back in the early 1940s when I was in grade school I remember the 5th grade teacher telling us about grunting cavemen.Were it not for church and the Bible, I would have likely become an evolutionist just from being taught that in school.Btw, I see the term creationist as incongruent to evolutionist. Creationism implies a creator, rather than disorganized soup to life to organized complexity absent of a creator. No?What creationist dream team would want the likes of you debating evolutionists, CS? You'd need to be a very efficient devil's advocate. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------