|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
Thread ▼ Details |
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: Occupy Wall Street | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
RAZD Member (Idle past 1435 days) Posts: 20714 From: the other end of the sidewalk Joined:
|
Hi GDR
... The government representing these people had no real choice but to pony up in response to this blackmail as the economic downside was intolerable. ... No, they could have let the banks fail and they could have bailed out the people. The same amount of money given to the people would have solved both the economic crisis and the social disruption caused by the ripple of mortgage dominoes throughout the economy. What this was, is simply a lesson in the hard truth of economics: an economy grows from the bottom up, not from the top down. The "Trickle-Down Theory" that conservatives and corporate bobbleheads so like to espouse is a failed theory: the failure happened from the bottom up, and it was no trickle. It happened because trickle down did not occur as promised: the people saw their earnings diminish instead of grow, and then they reached the point where there was no where else to go but failure.
I think what the people in the street are asking for is that their government do something or anything that brings integrity and justice to financial institutions. Look at the signs:
There are a lot of people with a lot of concerns about how Wall Street policies have impacted their lives ... for the worse (charging high fees and interest rates and sucking profits off the top). This is why it seems so diverse: it isn't a packaged agenda (like the tea baggers), it is the people: children, elderly, healthy, disabled, all of us in one big melting pot, all concerned that the cause of the financial crisis has not been dealt with and the bailouts did little but pad a few pockets and golden umbrellas, while Main Street saw squat.
What else can people do to draw attention to the situation? At least in Canada we had some regulation when it came to our banks and as a result we have what has been noted as the strongest banking system in the world. We did not even come close to having one of our banks fail. And I am happy to have a large part of my retirement funds there, and do my banking at a Credit Union. Modulus put a finger on it when he said it was about restoring the Glass—Steagall Act ... or at least restoring the regulation of banks and investments (most people probably don't know about the act or that critical sections were repealed by money sucking GOPs). Glass—Steagall legislation - Wikipedia
quote: I've said before that it was deregulation that was the culprit, and it looks like I am not alone with that conclusion. Enjoy.by our ability to understand Rebel American Zen Deist ... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ... to share. Join the effort to solve medical problems, AIDS/HIV, Cancer and more with Team EvC! (click)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GDR Member Posts: 6202 From: Sidney, BC, Canada Joined: Member Rating: 2.2 |
Zen Deist writes: No, they could have let the banks fail and they could have bailed out the people. The same amount of money given to the people would have solved both the economic crisis and the social disruption caused by the ripple of mortgage dominoes throughout the economy. I'm no expert but I would say that sounds good in theory but not in practice. The reason being is that so many people, either through direct employment, investments including pension plans etc had their future tied up in these institutions. I'd also make the observation that governments are not well positioned to dole out money to individuals when it is need and where it is needed. I suppose they could just cut taxes but that won't help those put into bankruptcy by all of this. I do think that there should have been far more restrictions but on the financial institutions including executive compensation.
Zen Deist writes: What this was, is simply a lesson in the hard truth of economics: an economy grows from the bottom up, not from the top down. The "Trickle-Down Theory" that conservatives and corporate bobbleheads so like to espouse is a failed theory: the failure happened from the bottom up, and it was no trickle. It happened because trickle down did not occur as promised: the people saw their earnings diminish instead of grow, and then they reached the point where there was no where else to go but failure. I don't think that we can make any clear cut statements of failed theory. I go back to the simple question of integrity. Frankly I believe, whether through capitalism, socialism or trickle-downism, that the system will work if those with the power are honest, fair and have their interests be about more than their own. Just the same I thought it was a great post and I’ll give it a thumbs up.Everybody is entitled to my opinion.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
crashfrog Member (Idle past 1497 days) Posts: 19762 From: Silver Spring, MD Joined:
|
What are they going to demand of their congressman, being most of them have no idea what they are protesting about, relative to Wall Street? I've heard it floated that Congress should pass a sweeping measure to forgive a substantial portion of Federal student loan debt, which I think is a great idea. At such time as there's a proposal on the table to do that, OWS protesters should urge their congressman to vote for it. OWS protesters in other states should do the same.
Wall street is where millions of stock holding Americans who's stock dividends and earned income Let me just stop you right there. While it's true that someone working on Wall Street may be paid a substantial amount, why should I believe that they've earned it? What did they make? What did they do, besides move a large sum of money to and fro and charge both sides a percentage for doing so? That one is wealthy is not evidence that what one is going is something that benefits society as a whole, or is particularly valuable. One may be a very successful thief, for instance.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Coyote Member (Idle past 2136 days) Posts: 6117 Joined: |
Here's one of those "occupiers" now!
I certainly want nothing to do with that sort of nonsense.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Coyote Member (Idle past 2136 days) Posts: 6117 Joined:
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Omnivorous Member Posts: 3992 From: Adirondackia Joined: Member Rating: 7.5 |
Well, I certainly don't anything to do with the handiwork of the GOP...
...like Abu Ghraib...
...or Oklahoma City. NB: Apply your objections to your own cherry-picked material."If you can keep your head while those around you are losing theirs, you can collect a lot of heads."
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
RAZD Member (Idle past 1435 days) Posts: 20714 From: the other end of the sidewalk Joined:
|
Hi GDR
I don't think that we can make any clear cut statements of failed theory. I go back to the simple question of integrity. Frankly I believe, whether through capitalism, socialism or trickle-downism, that the system will work if those with the power are honest, fair and have their interests be about more than their own. We have had trickle-down theory ever since Reagan, IIRC, but the poorest keep getting poorer. It doesn't work in good times and it certainly doesn't work in bad times. When the failure came it was from the bottom -- the people that could pay initially but could not keep up as their money continued to decline and interest rates increased. When the failure started, there were just a few foreclosures, but they snowballed, and suddenly it was the major banks that were in trouble. Now back-pedal: IF the people had been able to pay their mortgages THEN the collapse would not have occurred. The much trumpeted hoopla touted promised trickle-down failed to get to them in time -- and 6+ terms of presidents is a long time. The trickle of at least some money down should have occurred if the theory had even an iota of reality to it. There was none, in fact the effects at the bottom of the economic pyramid were negative: the gap between rich and poor has increased. By comparison the collapse took but a few weeks. The trickle up of the economy from the bottom to the top was rapid and readily visible to all.
I do think that there should have been far more restrictions but on the financial institutions including executive compensation. There used to be, the GOP got them removed via deregulation. The same people that promised the land of milk and honey from trickle-down of hand-outs to the rich by massive tax-cuts.
... that the system will work if those with the power are honest, fair and have their interests be about more than their own. BIG "if" there. When they aren't ... then government needs to regulate them to provide a minimal level of fairness ... that's one of the things government is supposed to do ... and when that doesn't happen, then you protest, publicly loudly and in large crowds: that is when you occupy wall street. It's not a single articulated message, it is the voice of the people, from mom&pop senior citizens to college loan kids, to cherry-picked anti-semites who still are upset about the economics (but who are pointed out to poison-well the argument) and who ALL want economic reform ... ... who all want to see ethical behavior in government and in the provisions of mortgages and loans with reasonable interest rates and conditions, and who want to see some of the effect of the massive bail-out spending reach to their pockets and their lives.
I'm no expert but I would say that sounds good in theory but not in practice. The reason being is that so many people, either through direct employment, investments including pension plans etc had their future tied up in these institutions. I'd also make the observation that governments are not well positioned to dole out money to individuals when it is need and where it is needed. I suppose they could just cut taxes but that won't help those put into bankruptcy by all of this. If the same amount of money had been distributed to pay for the foreclosures, then those bankruptcies would not have occurred, the banks would not have been in a position to fail, and the economy would not have suffered the domino effect that we have seen. If - at the same time - regulations had been revived or put into place, such that the "sub-prime" were no longer legal, and no new mortgages would qualify without proper assets (a condition we have now by default rather than regulation) then we would be further along the road to recovery -- recovery from decades of a failed experiment in economics. Enjoy.by our ability to understand Rebel American Zen Deist ... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ... to share. Join the effort to solve medical problems, AIDS/HIV, Cancer and more with Team EvC! (click)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GDR Member Posts: 6202 From: Sidney, BC, Canada Joined: Member Rating: 2.2 |
Hi ZD
Zen Deist writes: The much trumpeted hoopla touted promised trickle-down failed to get to them in time -- and 6+ terms of presidents is a long time. The trickle of at least some money down should have occurred if the theory had even an iota of reality to it. There was none, in fact the effects at the bottom of the economic pyramid were negative: the gap between rich and poor has increased. In my post if you look back you can see that I wasn't advocating for any particular economic theory. My point was that regardless of ideology what is most important is that those with the power have integrity. People keep electing governments based on ideology. I agree that ideology matters but in the end it is integrity that counts the most. (Of course that is also assuming that they have the intelligence to do the job.)
Zen Deist writes: If the same amount of money had been distributed to pay for the foreclosures, then those bankruptcies would not have occurred, the banks would not have been in a position to fail, and the economy would not have suffered the domino effect that we have seen. If - at the same time - regulations had been revived or put into place, such that the "sub-prime" were no longer legal, and no new mortgages would qualify without proper assets (a condition we have now by default rather than regulation) then we would be further along the road to recovery -- recovery from decades of a failed experiment in economics. A lot of those homes that were foreclosed on were bought by people who already had nice homes but speculated and bought high end properties. It wasn't just those at the bottom end of the food chain. You would have those that lived within their budget pay for those that didn't, and a lot of those that did live within their budget did so on very modest incomes. I do however agree with your comments on regulation. CheersEverybody is entitled to my opinion.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Buzsaw Inactive Member |
jar writes: Wall Street "affords" no one but the people that are actually working on Wall Street.It's time to return to a Progressive tax structure and a Progressive Inheritance Tax. Wall Street is comprised of the stock and commodity markets. Without these markets, the free enterprise system, including the corporations of it could not exist. Wall Street is the source of their funding. Without Wall Street you would have no trucking, food, technology, construction, etc corporations in this free nation, which has been the most free and blessed on the planet. BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW. The Immeasurable Present Eternally Extends the Infinite Past And Infinitely Consumes The Eternal Future.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
RAZD Member (Idle past 1435 days) Posts: 20714 From: the other end of the sidewalk Joined:
|
http://www.wtvr.com/...-declaration-20111001,0,2684547.story
"Occupy Wall Street" releases official declaration
quote: More on site linked above. Enjoy.by our ability to understand Rebel American Zen Deist ... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ... to share. Join the effort to solve medical problems, AIDS/HIV, Cancer and more with Team EvC! (click) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
onifre Member (Idle past 2981 days) Posts: 4854 From: Dark Side of the Moon Joined:
|
Here's a nice white lady talking - (with questionable make-up choices). Former banker, sensible, rational, not spounting crazy shit on a hand-held camera. You should be able support that right? There's no nonsense.
- Oni
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 424 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: |
Wall Street is nothing more than a middleman. While it helps making transfer of funding easier, it produces nothing, funds nothing.
Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
onifre Member (Idle past 2981 days) Posts: 4854 From: Dark Side of the Moon Joined:
|
which has been the most free and blessed on the planet. Tell that to black people...and Mexicans...and women...and gays...or any other minority. It sure must be nice being a white male in America. You can say dumb shit like what you just wrote and actually think you're right. - Oni
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Buzsaw Inactive Member |
GDR writes: The banks, particularly in the US, have acted not only without integrity but fraudulently.They loaned money out to hapless citizens, (in many cases knowing that when the sub-prime mortgage expired they would be unable to pay it back), then packaged up these loans and sold them to other financial institutions as blue chip loans. If you were a Fox News listener, you would be aware that Democrat congressmen, during the Bush Admin, and now the Obama Admin along with Democrat oversight congressmen were demanding the banks to dish out loans to people who couldn't afford them. Barny Frank, et al, assured the banks that government would cover them if the loans failed. That's exactly what they did. They borrowed billions and even trillions, the Federal Reserve printing the money, inflating the people's money and handed it over to the Fed Reserve bankers who now are holding it, stashing the people's money in their vaults, enriching themselves, knowing that if they loan it out they will likely loose it. The protesters should be at the White House and Congress protesting that they, not Wall Street or the rich that enriched the bankers and put them out of the homes which they couldn't afford in the first place. The protesters are organized by the Obama backed unions, Obama crony, billionaire socialist George Soros, et al and other left wing anti-capitalist entities who, unlike the well mannered Tea Partiers, occupy the people's parks, streets and businesses. Tea partiers OTO, would have their orderly (non trash/debris) rally, after which they would go back home and to work. These occupying thugs go defecate in business restrooms, on the streets, leave their BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW. The Immeasurable Present Eternally Extends the Infinite Past And Infinitely Consumes The Eternal Future.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Buzsaw Inactive Member |
onifre writes: which has been the most free and blessed on the planet. Tell that to black people...and Mexicans...and women...and gays...or any other minority. It sure must be nice being a white male in America. You can say dumb shit like what you just wrote and actually think you're right. Tell me, Onifre, in what nation are blacks, Hispanics better off than the ones in America? Tell me, Onifre, why, if America is so bad for minorities, why do Hispanics illegally cross our borders so as to find a better life, education and income? As an aside, VOTE FOR HERMAN KANE, THE REAL 100% FIRST BLACK CANDIDATE CAPABLE OF WINNING!! bUZSAW IS NO MINORITY RACIST!! ABE: Tell me, Onifre, why is it that blacks and hispanics risk their lives on high water ocean waters, under terrible odds, from Haite and Cuba, to raft to America's shores so as to enjoy the good American life? Edited by Buzsaw, : No reason given. Edited by Buzsaw, : No reason given.BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW. The Immeasurable Present Eternally Extends the Infinite Past And Infinitely Consumes The Eternal Future.
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024