Though I must admit that Ica stones were claimed a Hoax. By the maker. My problem is why didnt artifact dating was not able to properly date these stones. By dating they unable to prove it was acient or not. Only the creator admission was anyone able to find this out. Not by dating.
DrNasty writes:
So you cited evidence that you know to be a hoax.
This is why you are infuriating. While I don't agree with scotty in the least, you are falsely accusing him citing a hoax as evidence. Indeed he cited the hoax, but the hoax itself was not the evidence; it was science's inability to correctly date the stones that scotty used as evidence. He was saying that if science cannot correctly date artifacts, why should we believe they can correctly date dinosaur bones? The fact that he listed this evidence right after the soft tissue evidence of a t-rex should have given you a clue as to what he was using evidence for. The only way scotty could have used the hoax as evidence is he were trying to say the stones were as old as hoaxster originally said they were. This is dishonest of you unless you are in such a hurry to humiliate scotty that you did not take time to actually try and figure out what his argument was.