Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,902 Year: 4,159/9,624 Month: 1,030/974 Week: 357/286 Day: 0/13 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The war of atheism
Stile
Member
Posts: 4295
From: Ontario, Canada
Joined: 12-02-2004


Message 276 of 526 (680795)
11-21-2012 9:44 AM
Reply to: Message 275 by Straggler
11-21-2012 8:20 AM


The Problem
This isn't meant as a personal reply to Straggler, I'm just using a quote from his post in order to say what I want to say below...
If a homosexual man propositions another man in a way that "completely disregards his individual desires and wishes" is he being sexist?
If a woman propositions a man in a way that "completely disregards his individual desires and wishes" is she being sexist?
If a homosexual woman propositions a another woman in a way that "completely disregards her individual desires and wishes" is she being sexist?
If a man propositions a woman in a way that "completely disregards her individual desires and wishes" is he being sexist?
I don't think that any of this is the problem.
This is the correct view for the situation:
Elevator guy asked RW to go for coffee? Maybe creepy, maybe fine... who cares?
RW didn't like the offer and made fun of the guy? Maybe justified, maybe overboard... who cares?
People responded to RW with death threats and rape threats over this? What!???? Who the hell are these people and why do they think this kind of response is okay??!!! (Hint: This is where the focus should be).
The problem is, even after 270+ messages, people are still talking about whether or not elevator guy was justified, or whether or not RW was justified.
The issue should be about the crapload of cowards that thought any part of this situation demanded a response included death threats and/or rape threats.
We can even assume for the sake of argument that elevator guy was completely wrong, sexist and being a mysoginistic scumbag (regardless of if he actually was)... he's still not the big problem in this ordeal.
We can even assume for the sake of argument that RW was completely wrong, blew it out of proportion and totally rode the coattails of this publicity for her own gain (regardless of if she actually did)... she's still not the big problem in this ordeal.
Even given either of those two assumption... the big, massive, not-even-close, far-and-away largest problem here is the responses from those who thought any of this ordeal justified death or rape threats to RW.
To even begin to entertain the idea that whether or not the death/rape threats were okay depends on if we can understand the situation between RW and elevator guy... is equally ludicrous and appalling as to suggest that the threats are not the overwhelmingly biggest problem.
Talking about RW and elevator guy "just to figure it out" for fun can too easily be taken as "entertaining the aforementioned heinous idea above" and shouldn't be done in itself unless it is extremely clear that all parties involved in the discussion already agree that the "real problem" is the reaction from the peanut gallery. Cutting out the larger issue to discuss the smaller issues trivializes the larger issue and adds to the problem of allowing them to happen in the future.
The fact that we're talking about elevator guy and RW and all... and no one is continuing to express outrage at the actual, massive idiots who caused the problem... is the problem.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 275 by Straggler, posted 11-21-2012 8:20 AM Straggler has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 277 by Huntard, posted 11-21-2012 10:06 AM Stile has replied
 Message 279 by Straggler, posted 11-21-2012 10:37 AM Stile has seen this message but not replied

  
Stile
Member
Posts: 4295
From: Ontario, Canada
Joined: 12-02-2004


Message 278 of 526 (680800)
11-21-2012 10:10 AM
Reply to: Message 277 by Huntard
11-21-2012 10:06 AM


Re: The Problem
Huntard writes:
I think you'll be hard pressed to find anyone in this thread who thinks it was actually ok for Miss watson to receive the responses she did. Since that is really not a point of contention, we focus on another point, that is, apparently, contended.
...
We've already expressed it. I for one have, and I think everybody in this thread, even if they have not done so explicitly, thinks the same way about this. Having a long string of messages saying "I agree, these guys are dickheads", does not a very fun thread make, however.
I know.
Sometimes I just like to rant. And where is a better place than this?
Did you see the height of my soapbox? It must've been at least, like... 3 feet high!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 277 by Huntard, posted 11-21-2012 10:06 AM Huntard has seen this message but not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024