Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,907 Year: 4,164/9,624 Month: 1,035/974 Week: 362/286 Day: 5/13 Hour: 0/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The best scientific method (Bayesian form of H-D)
sidelined
Member (Idle past 5938 days)
Posts: 3435
From: Edmonton Alberta Canada
Joined: 08-30-2003


Message 20 of 273 (75765)
12-30-2003 2:20 AM


Hey better yet does this praying work even if you don't believe in it?

  
sidelined
Member (Idle past 5938 days)
Posts: 3435
From: Edmonton Alberta Canada
Joined: 08-30-2003


Message 27 of 273 (75861)
12-30-2003 5:41 PM
Reply to: Message 26 by Stephen ben Yeshua
12-30-2003 3:48 PM


Re: Nature and human nature research
Stephen
Evolutionists who ignore well established scientific methods, which validate God's claims commit this sort of injustice. Of course they wail that there is "no evidence" (like, right, they have examined all available evidence!).
The only one wailing around here is yourself because people do not take you at your word here without evidence.Are you ever going to present it or are you playing head games?
------------------
...people today are so accustomed to pretentious nonsense that they see nothing amiss in reading without understanding, and many of them at length discover that they can without difficulty write in like manner themselves and win applause for it. And so it perpetuates itself.
G. A. Wells, 1991

This message is a reply to:
 Message 26 by Stephen ben Yeshua, posted 12-30-2003 3:48 PM Stephen ben Yeshua has not replied

  
sidelined
Member (Idle past 5938 days)
Posts: 3435
From: Edmonton Alberta Canada
Joined: 08-30-2003


Message 86 of 273 (79214)
01-18-2004 11:21 AM
Reply to: Message 85 by Stephen ben Yeshua
01-18-2004 10:49 AM


Re: Metaphysical Transport
Stephan
'Crazy people whose behavior is most easily explained by demons' << Again, too simplistic and escapist.
This sounds to me like I win the Occham's razor debate!
LOL Just how do you suppose you win with Occam's razor?

"I am not young enough to know everything. "
Oscar Wilde

This message is a reply to:
 Message 85 by Stephen ben Yeshua, posted 01-18-2004 10:49 AM Stephen ben Yeshua has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 87 by Abshalom, posted 01-18-2004 11:39 AM sidelined has not replied

  
sidelined
Member (Idle past 5938 days)
Posts: 3435
From: Edmonton Alberta Canada
Joined: 08-30-2003


Message 116 of 273 (79693)
01-20-2004 10:42 PM
Reply to: Message 113 by Stephen ben Yeshua
01-20-2004 3:55 PM


Re: Online?
Stephan
I want to offer a challenge to you. I enjoy this forum greatly and I feel that in all likelihood I will be on here for many years to come.
We finally get an actual prediction.
But the Bible codes are predicting a nuclear holocaust in 2006, to which the Israeli intelligence is saying, "We already knew that from other sources." So, there may not be much a history of science to impress.
I will tell you what.I will bet whatever you wish to on the inability of the prophecy you just made to come true short of you personally starting it. And by the by how did you get an inside on what the Isralei intelligence is saying or not saying? So on Jan 1 2007 I will be sending you a personal note that you are full of it.

'Everyone is entitled to his own opinion but not his own facts.'
(Daniel Patrick Moynihan)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 113 by Stephen ben Yeshua, posted 01-20-2004 3:55 PM Stephen ben Yeshua has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 121 by Andya Primanda, posted 01-21-2004 10:25 AM sidelined has not replied
 Message 122 by NosyNed, posted 01-21-2004 10:59 AM sidelined has replied

  
sidelined
Member (Idle past 5938 days)
Posts: 3435
From: Edmonton Alberta Canada
Joined: 08-30-2003


Message 139 of 273 (79972)
01-22-2004 1:47 AM
Reply to: Message 122 by NosyNed
01-21-2004 10:59 AM


Re: Online?
Nosyned
I would bet against the use of a nuclear device of a sufficient yield to devestate even one significantly powerful nation,say Germany. The implementation of a single nuclear weapon hardly warrants the term holocaust.The launching of multiple targeted warheads from a distance of at least 300 miles would seem to be the bare minimum in order to carry out an attack with the element of surprise in your favour and even then it is highly doubtful given todays technology of satellite surveillence.

'Everyone is entitled to his own opinion but not his own facts.'
(Daniel Patrick Moynihan)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 122 by NosyNed, posted 01-21-2004 10:59 AM NosyNed has not replied

  
sidelined
Member (Idle past 5938 days)
Posts: 3435
From: Edmonton Alberta Canada
Joined: 08-30-2003


Message 152 of 273 (80470)
01-24-2004 11:59 AM
Reply to: Message 151 by Stephen ben Yeshua
01-24-2004 11:32 AM


Re: Satan versus God
Stephan
Think of it this way. A meterorite is coming to strike the earth and kill all life on it. A very wealthy, wise man builds a space ship that will carry anyone and everyone away, to wait out the disaster. But, he makes the rule that only people committed to love, proving this committment by loving him, can get on board.
I just had a shudder run down my back. When I read this my mind instantly recalled the "Heaven's Gate" cult.

'Everyone is entitled to his own opinion but not his own facts.'
(Daniel Patrick Moynihan)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 151 by Stephen ben Yeshua, posted 01-24-2004 11:32 AM Stephen ben Yeshua has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 155 by Stephen ben Yeshua, posted 01-24-2004 7:07 PM sidelined has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024