Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 66 (9078 total)
686 online now:
dwise1, kjsimons, Percy (Admin), Phat (4 members, 682 visitors)
Newest Member: harveyspecter
Post Volume: Total: 895,147 Year: 6,259/6,534 Month: 452/650 Week: 222/278 Day: 18/44 Hour: 1/7


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   There is no evolution or creationism - this is the new Matrix/DNA world view
TheMatrix/DNA
Member (Idle past 824 days)
Posts: 47
From: Newark-NJ-USA
Joined: 06-05-2015


Message 1 of 149 (762058)
07-08-2015 3:32 AM


Every known reproduction process is made off by smalls evolutionary steps ( remember embryogenesis). From the Big Bang to the end of this Universe - the Big Birth - is occurring a reproductive process of the unknown thing that generated the Universe. The smalls evolutionary steps are about a unique natural system that is changing shape due the same force that makes a human body changing its shapes: the force of life's cycles.

So we had the atom system, the stellar, the galactic, the cell system and finally the self-conscious system( all these natural systems were our ancestrals). We have discovered that all these systems has a common formula ( which I will bring here in shape of algorithm), called Matrix/DNA, and the biological DNA is merely its last shape here and today.

I am challenging everybody to bring on here a unique real proved scientific fact that could debunk this new theory, because I am searching it everywhere, every new scientific paper or NASA's Images, in the last 30 years, and never found anything.

This new world view leaves doors opened to creationism and to materialism, my method of investigation/calculations can't go beyond the natural limits of universe's spacetime, so I don't know what's or who is the ex-machine creator. Then, this is the theory for agnostics, the third view that I think, has the right to participate in this debate also. Thanks by any criticism, questions, etc. ( I am American citizen but English is not my native language, so, any grammatical correction will be welcome).

Edited by Admin, : Fix title.


Replies to this message:
 Message 3 by Percy, posted 07-08-2015 6:57 AM TheMatrix/DNA has replied
 Message 4 by New Cat's Eye, posted 07-08-2015 9:48 AM TheMatrix/DNA has replied
 Message 6 by Capt Stormfield, posted 07-08-2015 12:10 PM TheMatrix/DNA has not replied
 Message 100 by Isabel, posted 07-20-2015 11:30 AM TheMatrix/DNA has not replied

  
TheMatrix/DNA
Member (Idle past 824 days)
Posts: 47
From: Newark-NJ-USA
Joined: 06-05-2015


Message 7 of 149 (762091)
07-09-2015 1:09 AM
Reply to: Message 3 by Percy
07-08-2015 6:57 AM


Testing
To Percy:

Some explanations:
1) This is a common pattern identified at all natural systems, from light waves to atoms to astronomicals to cells, etc.
2) The first time this formula appeared was in shape of a natural single wave of light. Each one of the seven frequencies/vibration states of a light wave is one of the seven function I can bring on the graphic showing how it works;
3) The formula is the algorithmic shape of the flow of energy/information that runs inside the systemic circuity connecting the parts of the system. Nature self-assembles systems applying the force of life's cycles upon an initial body containing mass, light and the energy carried by light. This force leads the body to change its shapes. Then, Nature connects seven different shapes of the same body, linking the end with the initial point of the circuity, closing the system;
4) Under the process of life's cycle. the body moves under the extensions space and time. The arrows represents the waves in time, the functions are the parts that represents the particles in space. So, if you see my avatar, the particles or parts are the figures of baby, woman, man, etc., and the age or time are the spaces between the figures.
5) For each existent natural system, each of its parts are located upon a function. So, for instance, a cell system: F1 is the nucleus, F2 is centromeres, F3 is robossome, F4 is mitochondria, F5 is the moving RNA's, F6 is the chloroplast, F7 is the lysosome. If you take the building block of astronomical systems, F1 is the central nucleus containing a quasar with a black hole, F2 is a baby-body or the nucleus of the new body, e3 is the planets, F4 is the pulsar, etc.
6) The Matrix formula is under evolution like our DNA, its first shape was a light wave and when it arrived at galaxies the formula became a closed system, as the formula above. Then, the system closed its door to evolution, was attacked by entropy, fragmented in its bits-information-photons, which are spreaded as seeds of life, rebuilding the formula as opened systems and in microscopy dimension.
7) All life's properties, included those at human bodies are seeing in the formula. Like the sexual reproductive process, the digestive system, the circulatory system, the principles of immune defense system, etc.
7) It seems a single formula but it contains all complexity existent today at any natural system in the universe. If you want know more details, fell free for asking.

Edited by TheMatrix/DNA, : No reason given.

Edited by TheMatrix/DNA, : No reason given.


There was no origins of life and universe, astronomical systems are half-alive, light waves contains the code for life and DNA is not a code: Matrix/DNA Theory

This message is a reply to:
 Message 3 by Percy, posted 07-08-2015 6:57 AM Percy has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 8 by Capt Stormfield, posted 07-09-2015 2:02 AM TheMatrix/DNA has replied
 Message 13 by Percy, posted 07-09-2015 7:28 AM TheMatrix/DNA has replied
 Message 19 by NoNukes, posted 07-09-2015 2:42 PM TheMatrix/DNA has replied

  
TheMatrix/DNA
Member (Idle past 824 days)
Posts: 47
From: Newark-NJ-USA
Joined: 06-05-2015


Message 9 of 149 (762094)
07-09-2015 2:26 AM
Reply to: Message 4 by New Cat's Eye
07-08-2015 9:48 AM


To Cat Sci
quote:
Are you sure that isn't because it is unfalsifiable?

I think it is falsifiable, due:

1) The formula is a perfect template to all known natural systems, moving cycles of any elements, and explains the processes by which the most simplified systems ( like a light wave, a superparticle, an atom, etc) were transformed into the next more complex system. So, if someone finds a natural system which physical structure and internal mechanisms does not fit upon the formula, should be as someone finding a biological living being without RNA or DNA. In this case, the formula could be debunked;

2) In any way the whole theory touches metaphysics or anything beyond the observable universe. So, the theory is not dependable of some untouchable element or entity. It explains every natural phenomena or event inside the universe, and if someone find one, the theory could be debunked.

3) I tried to get knowledge of the most possible quantity of natural laws and mechanisms enrolled by human natural sciences, from physics to biology to neurology to geology, etc; and I have not found one single law that is not obeyed by the whole natural Universal History described by the theory. I am finding theoretical laws and mechanisms that are believed by the current mainstream, but, then, it is theory against theory - only new real proved fact could debunk the theory.

4) I believe that the logical reasoning in this world view is the most perfect existent. All known biological systems are based upon a common formula ( a base-pair of nucleotides which is the building blocks of RNA and DNA). This formula exists at biological systems because biological systems are merely an evolutionary step resulting from the evolution at micro and astronomical level. So, from atoms to galaxies, all are aligned in a unique evolutionary lineage. Then, the building blocks of DNA is a product of the building blocks of those ancestral systems, till the first shape of this systems that arose from the Big Bang. In another hand, the current academic paradigm or world view has broken the universal history into two blocks - cosmological evolution and biological evolution - without a n evolutionary link between the two blocks. One fatal result is that they are not getting to explain the origins of life, or the emergence of biological systems. Matrix/DNA has no such problem.

5) This formula can be reproduced in mechanical fashion by human beings in labs, and it it works, if the system acquire life by itself, the formula will be proved. I have ideas for experiments trying to do it.

7) There are more motives I believe it is falsifiable, but too long and complex to write it here.


There was no origins of life and universe, astronomical systems are half-alive, light waves contains the code for life and DNA is not a code: Matrix/DNA Theory

This message is a reply to:
 Message 4 by New Cat's Eye, posted 07-08-2015 9:48 AM New Cat's Eye has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 16 by New Cat's Eye, posted 07-09-2015 10:14 AM TheMatrix/DNA has replied
 Message 21 by NoNukes, posted 07-09-2015 2:48 PM TheMatrix/DNA has not replied

  
TheMatrix/DNA
Member (Idle past 824 days)
Posts: 47
From: Newark-NJ-USA
Joined: 06-05-2015


Message 10 of 149 (762107)
07-09-2015 3:10 AM
Reply to: Message 5 by jar
07-08-2015 10:23 AM


To Jar
quote:
What is the theory?.

Well... I have a website where I am exposing circa de 1800 evidences and right predictions made by the theory about 30 years ago. It is the narration of a history that takes 13,7 billion years carried by a unique natural formula brought inside any natural light wave emitted at the Big Bang. It is the Universal Natural History of a unique single natural system that was born 13,7 billion years ago and now and at our terrestrial level it is getting the shape of a conscious system.

The universe as a con-agglomerate of galaxies is not anything else than the ' placenta' inside which this system is developing, so, the universal process is like the embryogenesis of a human body. If such history is true, this system must have a kind of RNA/DNA, a genetic code, and for it I am introducing the Matrix/DNA formula showing how it can be reduced to a single working light wave.

This new world view did not come gratefully from the sky. It is result of 20 years of elaboration by extreme hard work, included seven years of observations at the heart of Amazon jungle where the witness of life's origins are still untouchable. And the last 30 years testing it.

This is not a case for believing or not, is a case for testing against real proved facts and natural events. I am extreme skeptical, I don't believe it is right and I don't believe it is wrong. But, I see it as extreme logical, rational, and if it is right, it will bring lots of beneficials to human kind.

The logics behind it began as an intuition at my high school times:
1) The first real complete living being was the first working cell and the cell was a complete working system;
2) All biological system known today were produced by a previous biological natural system and by the genetic process while the transference of a genetic code. This lineage is going from the simplest biological system towards the most complex;
Conclusion: The first living being or biological system was produced by a less evolutionary natural system, by genetic process and a less evolutionary genetic code. If we does not know which is/was this creator natural system, we must search for it. So I will put my hands at work from know searching for it. The best place must be a place with large genetic diversity, containing all elements of biosphere, and aniche not transformed/touched by superior animals or human beings. So, the best place that could keeping informations about this mysterious system is the heart of Amazon jungle.

If you find a fault in this intuition, pleas, let me know...


There was no origins of life and universe, astronomical systems are half-alive, light waves contains the code for life and DNA is not a code: Matrix/DNA Theory

This message is a reply to:
 Message 5 by jar, posted 07-08-2015 10:23 AM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 11 by Dr Adequate, posted 07-09-2015 4:01 AM TheMatrix/DNA has not replied
 Message 15 by jar, posted 07-09-2015 8:03 AM TheMatrix/DNA has not replied

  
TheMatrix/DNA
Member (Idle past 824 days)
Posts: 47
From: Newark-NJ-USA
Joined: 06-05-2015


Message 12 of 149 (762115)
07-09-2015 4:10 AM
Reply to: Message 8 by Capt Stormfield
07-09-2015 2:02 AM


To Capt Stormfield
quote:
Just for fun, move all the words around into a different order and see if it makes any difference.

Sorry, I am not understanding yours 2 posts, maybe it is due two different cultures. It seems that you like to play with words, which is not the topic here, maybe I am wrong. But you got a very good interesting point. I will explain:

Matrix/DNA Theory is also the results of changing the direction used by the academic Standard Model for writing the universal history, from the Big Bang to life, from the past towards the future. I began with life, from the future towards the past, then, applying reduced evolutionary mechanisms I arrived to a Big Bang also. It is curious but you can move all the words used by the Standard Model around into a different order and see that it makes any difference. Would be the Standard Model merely a robot repeating texts or spamming...

Matrix/DNA Theory is suggesting that the whole Universal Natural History can be described from the past to future, but if you starts in the future towards the past, the same words will describe same history. For explaining it we need an analogy:

Considers the long life of an embryonary sac during its 9 months of existence. We will write its entire history. For begining we will mention the existence of a human specie ( in shape of a mother), which created the embryonary sac. After 9 months the embryonary sac does not exists anymore and we went back to the human specie ( in shape of a baby). So, everything began with the human specie and everything finished at a human specie. The sac was discarded, disappeared, is like it never existed. The name of this history should be "From the Human Specie back to the Human Specie"

Same happens with the history of the Universe. Before the beginning there was something, which we don't know, but let's call it, a system. The universal sac exists by 13,7 billion years, but it could reach 20 billion years. After this 20 billion years the sac will not exist, WILL BE DISCARDED LIKE THE EMBRYONARY SAC, end we will go back to the same specie of system that was existing before.

So, you can describe it from the past to the future or from the future to the past, you never will get another result than the same one. This is genetic reproduction and not robotic text reproduction or spamming.

The Standard Model describes a history that could be called as "From the Smallest Atom back to the Smallest Atom". You can believe that the history should be "From God back to God". Matrix/DNA Theory is suggesting that the right name should be "From a Conscious Natural System back to the Conscious Natural System".

So, thanks a lot for you playing with words and having fun here where I never got any fun because for thinking and working with Matrix/DNA Theory we need every slice of our brain very busy.... Cheers...

Edited by TheMatrix/DNA, : No reason given.


There was no origins of life and universe, astronomical systems are half-alive, light waves contains the code for life and DNA is not a code: Matrix/DNA Theory

This message is a reply to:
 Message 8 by Capt Stormfield, posted 07-09-2015 2:02 AM Capt Stormfield has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 18 by Capt Stormfield, posted 07-09-2015 12:52 PM TheMatrix/DNA has not replied
 Message 20 by Dr Adequate, posted 07-09-2015 2:46 PM TheMatrix/DNA has not replied

  
TheMatrix/DNA
Member (Idle past 824 days)
Posts: 47
From: Newark-NJ-USA
Joined: 06-05-2015


Message 23 of 149 (762259)
07-10-2015 12:49 AM
Reply to: Message 13 by Percy
07-09-2015 7:28 AM


To Percy
quote:
What are the "seven frequencies/vibration states of a light wave"?.

Hi Percy. Unfortunately, if you want to understand this world view, beginning by light is the wrong way. Because light is the last issue when the theory is describing the Universal Natural History which could be resumed into the history of a system, a unique universal system which has a kind of DNA, here called Matrix formula. This system is under evolution and its most complex shapes are here and now, under our eyes. Here and now we can see it in shape of brain ( the hippocampus is F1, the pituitary is F2, the cortex is F4, and so on), in shape of thorax ( heart is F1, liver is F7 and so on) in shape of the building blocks of DNA ( F1 is the left sugar, F2 is alanine, F3 is guanine, F4 is the right sugar, and so on). Or in the shape of a cell system ( F1 is the nucleus, F3 is ribosome, etc.).

So, if we have the universal system and its eternal formula here and now, why we would begin to understand its existence by focusing its first and primordial shape at 13, 7 billion years ago, as was its light wave shape, and then, the most difficult for us to reach its nature.... It makes no sense.

The Matrix/DNA theory began 50 years ago at life here and now, and walked backwards. It was about 30 years ago I reached the system in its shape of atoms, composing the atomic nebulae before assembling stellar and galactic systems. From atoms and walking backwards we penetrates the world of particles and there, I found that the Nobel Prize Hideki Yukawa and his explanation how a proton glues with a neutron was enough for explaining the origins of the Matrix formula phenotype. Two bi-lateral symmetric bubbles.

But, it was missing something for these bubbles given the next evolutionary step, it was missing some more complexity, which must be inside the bubbles. This mystery was unsolvable by 20 years, till the last year when I was observing the waves formed by the electromagnetic radiation pictured as a spectrum. Suddenly the solution came to mind. The variation of that waves are the same energetic variations of a human body in its 70 years of existence.

What causes the transformation of shapes of a human body is a process called "life's cycle". If the sequence of variations in a radioactive wave is the same sequence of human bodies, then, the force of lifes cycles is acting over the radiation also. But, electromagnetic radiation and light were existing before life's origins. Then, the force of lifes cycles was not invented by living beings, the opposite must be true: living beings, or life, were written into those waves. From gamma ray to radio is encoded the principle of life. And these radiations came at the momentum of the Big Bang, suggesting that they was existing before this universe. Since that it is the code for life and since that it is a genetic phenomenon, it means that beyond and before this universe there was life, so, the unique universal system that is evolving here is also under the process of lifes cycles.

The conclusion is obvious: light is the arms and hands of god if you want to call the natural conscious systems that was existing before as a non magical god in same way that my parents' genomes were their arms and hands for building my body.

So, it was only about a year ago that I went crazy studying everything that I can about light, electromagnetic radiation, etc. But I am at the final understand of this world view, and those that want to understand it, must begin as I did, studying the matrix formula and its systems shape here and now. By the way I will try to bring here a picture revealing how the electromagnetic spectrum fits with the process of lifes cycle. Cheers...


There was no origins of life and universe, astronomical systems are half-alive, light waves contains the code for life and DNA is not a code: Matrix/DNA Theory

This message is a reply to:
 Message 13 by Percy, posted 07-09-2015 7:28 AM Percy has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 27 by Percy, posted 07-10-2015 7:48 AM TheMatrix/DNA has replied

  
TheMatrix/DNA
Member (Idle past 824 days)
Posts: 47
From: Newark-NJ-USA
Joined: 06-05-2015


Message 24 of 149 (762261)
07-10-2015 2:26 AM
Reply to: Message 16 by New Cat's Eye
07-09-2015 10:14 AM


Re: To Cat Sci
Cat Sci wrote:

quote:
What about F=ma or V=IR? One of Newton's Laws and Ohm's Law.

Newton's 2nd Law of Motion: Force equals mass times acceleration.

Ohm's Law: Voltage equals current times resistance.

How do those fit within your theory?


As I said, I have not found one single law that is not obeyed by the whole natural Universal History described by the theory. About the laws you remembered above, I did not see any slice of that narration of the History that "does not fit with those laws". Then, for to answer how to those fit within the theory it is necessary that I take three heavy books telling about millions of events and explaining how each event fits within the laws.

There is a good method for avoiding that we make a theory full of mistakes when it is peer-reviewed by specialists. And I applied this method. It is about never advances to the next step in your theory before finding in Nature here and now a real proved fact that fits with yours last theoretical conclusion. You need to attach every conclusion in solid grounds, and the unique solid ground is Nature. If there is in Nature another figure that fits with yours last theoretical figure, you can go on. If not, stops, search where you made mistakes, or give up with your theory because you are entering into the reign of metaphysics.

If the results of yous calculations is happening at any another place of Nature, yours results are obeying the Newton's laws, the Ohm's law, the kangaroo's laws, or if not, the Newton's laws would be wrong, because Nature never is wrong.

This supreme requirement of formal logics are not being obeyed by several great theoriss today. One sample is Stephen Hawkings and his theoretical black hole. I am sure, never at any time and any place someone found in Nature a real proved fact that equals to Stephen~s black hole. There is no natural parameter as base for him to believe in his mathematical results. I would stop Matrix/DNA theory just here. But, then, he and others are taking that theoretical model as thru and upon it developing cosmological theories.

When my calculations arrived to the galactic nuclei and it was necessary to calculate what is inside it, I inserted conclusions that were coming from different pathways, I draw a nebular cloud of dusty rotating in space, tried to see what would happening next, etc., and finally got a model that fits as the systemic part of the system that later would produces the first cell system at Earth. I got a picture about what was inside the galactic nuclei, very different than the Hawking model. But... then I searched in Nature and found another place and time the same figure I had from my calculations. And my theory is suggesting that there is no possibility that after the Big bang and the initial extreme singularity, matter and energy could going back to singularity. Before reaching this point, the whole thing should be transformed. Then, I think, the ghost black hole with no parameter in this world does not exist.

It does no mean that you can not find the smallest detail of my theory that those laws does not fit within. That is why I call it a theory: it is not the final thru, mistakes will be find, it is here bor being changed, improved, tested. Maybe one parameter that I found I didn't know the thru about it and it does not fit as parameter. Have a nice time, scientific cat...


There was no origins of life and universe, astronomical systems are half-alive, light waves contains the code for life and DNA is not a code: Matrix/DNA Theory

This message is a reply to:
 Message 16 by New Cat's Eye, posted 07-09-2015 10:14 AM New Cat's Eye has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 28 by New Cat's Eye, posted 07-10-2015 11:35 AM TheMatrix/DNA has replied

  
TheMatrix/DNA
Member (Idle past 824 days)
Posts: 47
From: Newark-NJ-USA
Joined: 06-05-2015


Message 25 of 149 (762263)
07-10-2015 3:31 AM
Reply to: Message 17 by 1.61803
07-09-2015 10:56 AM


Reply to 1.61803
1.61803 wrote:

quote:
So we are privy to a grand unifying theory that incorporates all the know forces and laws of nature and explains everything from the BB to energy manifesting consciousness.

Mr. 1.61803 ( or Mr. Number Phi), if there is such theory, it must explain everything included the cause that you have produced at every place and every moment of the Universal History the beauty of bi-lateral symmetry that those mystical persons call as The Sacred Geometry. The explanation should be extraordinary, because the claim about a sacred geometry is a extraordinary claim. it happens that Matrix/DNA Theory brought to us an extraordinary explanation about Phy. Unfortunately it is written in Portuguese but if you go to
http://theuniversalmatrix.com/pt-br/artigos/?cat=834 you can see it.

I will explain in short terms here because in another post I brought the Matrix formula, so, you can see it. What's, why s there the number phy, why it produces such astonishing effects...

In Matrix formula the Function number 5 has just the value of 1,61803... For finding it you need fix the formula and considering that a whole round of its circuity is fixed as number 1. Then you begin at F1 again and goes to F2, F3, F4. Stops here, you got more 0,5 which added with 1 is 1,5. From F4, instead following the flow to F6, follow the lateral emitted internally flow number 5 and go adding the centimeters, to 1,6... to 1,61803... and stops here. You are just at the center of the sphere.

F5 is the universal systemic function responsible for reproduction of the system. If a system is human species, F4 is the male function and F5 is the spermatozoon function ( you can see the origins of chromosomes at 10 billion years ago here:
http://theuniversalmatrix.com/...dos-cromossomas-sexuais.jpg )

If a system is a cell, the element that performs F5 is the RNA. If it is the building block of astronomical systems, the element is a comet. And so on. Every time it is about reproduction. If a system is the building blocks of DNA F5 is the nitrogenous base called uracil. Always uracil produces a new section of the DNA which makes DNA increasing since its primordial times.

It happens that the Matrix formula above is the shape of the formula as closed system. And the unique moment in this universe that matter reached the state of perfect closed system was when it produced the building block for astronomical systems. But, this system was hermaphrodite, and its reproductive process was self-recycling. Then, the function of F5 was reproducing the left face of that formula into the right face. This mechanism was applied later when there was the RNA world without DNA. It was this function that took the existing RNA as left face and reproducing it as the right face invented the DNA. This mechanism is used till today every time the cell produces a new protein.

So, F5, which location inside the Matrix formula is just 1,61803 is specialized into reproducing an existing left face into a new right face... and voila... we have bi-lateral symmetry. Beauty! The Sacred Geometry... mathematically explained.

Now that the theory has explained the origins of yours name, let it to explain the origins of yours own body. I will suppose that you are 20 years old. So, at 20 years and 9 months ago, there was a single ovule. Suddenly arrive at the center of this ovule a spaceship full of et's, called male genes. And suddenly the spaceship exploded, causing a big perturbation event inside the ovule. it was the spermatozoon membrane that broken up. From here you know the history but letçs remember that at 6 or seven months, emerged inside the embryo a thing called consciousness.

Ok, the nowaday scientific team has a big cosmological theory explaining that this Universe began with a bang. And we know that after 13,7 billion years inside this universe emerged a thing called consciousness. Of course, the scientific team is using the history of yours embryogenese as the history of this universe.

You said that we are privy to a grand unifying theory that incorporates all the know forces, etc. We dos not need such theory, Mr Phi. We already have the thru. Not the theory narrated by the scientific team, because you know that they copied a natural narrative. I am telling about the narrative from Nature. Nature does not plays dice with its creatures, then, if the grand Mother pointed out to yours embryogenesis for explaining the universal, you must believe in it.

Matrix/DNA Theory is all way repetition of known real proved natural phenomena connected under the command of pure reason, as Nature did it. The scientific team does not want to recognize that Nature have revealed here the great unifying theory, so, Matrix came for recognizing it. But this was yours obligation because as number Phy, you are the specialist for doing the best and beauty reproductions.


There was no origins of life and universe, astronomical systems are half-alive, light waves contains the code for life and DNA is not a code: Matrix/DNA Theory

This message is a reply to:
 Message 17 by 1.61803, posted 07-09-2015 10:56 AM 1.61803 has not replied

  
TheMatrix/DNA
Member (Idle past 824 days)
Posts: 47
From: Newark-NJ-USA
Joined: 06-05-2015


Message 26 of 149 (762264)
07-10-2015 4:16 AM
Reply to: Message 19 by NoNukes
07-09-2015 2:42 PM



Nonukes wrote:

quote:
Say what? I suppose now that you've explained it, there is no point in me asking for your algorithm.

Nonukes, you make me worry. I am illiterate in computer sciences, so, maybe I am using wrong words. Maybe the word algorithm does not apply where I am using it, so, I ask you to correct me.

I am using algorithm by this definition: In mathematics and computer science, an algorithm is a self-contained step-by-step set of operations to be performed. Algorithms exist that perform calculation, data processing, and automated reasoning.

Then, I remember the old flow charts learned at high school 30 years ago, and I think that the matrix formula fits as a flow chart. I am describing in the following why and how it works as algorithm. It is wrong, please, tell me.

The Matrix/DNA formula as a closed system algorithm (it is the state of this formula at astronomical scales. To other scales, the instructions must be changed):

F1) Are there raw ingredients in space, in the form of mass and energy, and swirling due rotation of space?
If so, form a whirlpool mixing raw ingredients and cooking them until bubbles are ejected to the external space. The bubbles will be the core of a new astronomical body;
If not, don’t form the whirlpool.

2) The bubble adds more raw and frozen ingredients in the space?
If yes, continue heading into the sidereal space, now under the names of “star-seed” inside a “planet”;
If not, be undone as a bubble.

3) The planet passes close to a star?
If yes, get in their orbits;
If not, continue wandering in space to unravel.

4) The nucleus is reached by the star’s energy?
If yes, start nuclear reactions feeding on the outer layers of ingredients, i.e. the geological layers. Go to F6;
If not, become a moon.
5) Is the nuclear reaction evolving and eating the layers to the surface?
If yes, the pressure form the volcanos ejecting comets (carrying on active nuclear reactions for to activate the whirlpool) and falling internally on the galactic’s spiral towards the core. Go to F1;
If not, freeze like a moon.
6) The nuclear reaction reached the final surface layer?
If yes, self-collapsing becoming a star supernova;
If not, freeze like moon.
7) Were sold out the energy particles within the atoms of the nutrients’ layers?
If yes, self-dissolves into fragmented in ingredient mass to form new whirlpool, and self recycles yours body.
If not, become a giant dead planet of inert gas.
The Matrix/DNA formula for open systems:

1) Being yourself an electromagnetic structure, or atomic, or astronomic, or biological, repeat all steps to F5;

2) Do you want to perpetuate this form of body/life’s cycle/closed system?
If Yes, go internally to the nucleus and repeat his eternal cycle;
If not, go externally to relate to the outer unknown.
Note: for example, if you’re a man, and married, drive all your F5 for a single and same woman, reproducing only a unique type of DNA. If you’re a man, and celibate, drive your F5 to the largest quantity of different women, producing diverse kinds of DNA. Other example: drive yours behaviors to be an extreme nationalist or to be opened to globalization. Or other: as a bird in Galapagos, keep yourself in Galapagos eternally or immigrates to the next island for to be found by Darwin as mutated and naturally selected
- See more at: http://theuniversalmatrix.com/pt-br/artigos/?p=9279#sthas...


There was no origins of life and universe, astronomical systems are half-alive, light waves contains the code for life and DNA is not a code: Matrix/DNA Theory

This message is a reply to:
 Message 19 by NoNukes, posted 07-09-2015 2:42 PM NoNukes has not replied

  
TheMatrix/DNA
Member (Idle past 824 days)
Posts: 47
From: Newark-NJ-USA
Joined: 06-05-2015


Message 29 of 149 (762297)
07-10-2015 2:34 PM
Reply to: Message 27 by Percy
07-10-2015 7:48 AM


Re: To Percy
quote:
It was you who began with light - it was mentioned right up front in your first point.

No, Percy, I don't mentioned it in my first post, only at the second for beginning to explain the formula, and if you don't do that - mentioning what is the end and the final of a new unknown world view - talking only about the middle of the history, it seems to be a building without foundations and roof. Like any cosmological theory, it is necessary to give the famous initial jump in the dark. Standard Theory do that when talking about the Big Bang and the smallest ex-machine atom and the final Big Crunch, the Bible'a theory do that when talking about genesis and the final judgement.

So, unfortunately when any theory arrives to the beginnings or the ends, the final material object encountered touches metaphysics, which is an unsolvable mystery for our limited brain today. That's why I try to escape from the light wave issue. We have in the middle of the building the things we need for improve our lifes here and now, so, why loosing time debating metaphysics...

quote:
So the "seven frequencies/vibration states of light" are apparently radio, microwave, infrared, visible, ultraviolet, X-ray and gamma-ray, which is merely one way the electromagnetic spectrum is traditionally divided and is a human, not a natural, construct. We humans divide up the electromagnetic spectrum into ranges in other ways, too. The Wikipedia article on the electromagnetic spectrum divides the spectrum into 19 ranges in the table at the top, and then further on they present another way of dividing the spectrum into 9 ranges. And there are other ways to divide the spectrum. Some birds can see in the ultraviolet, which merges ultraviolet into the visible part of the spectrum, leaving you only six divisions. Some animals can detect the infra-red, putting that also in the visible portion and leaving you only five divisions.

Exactly Percy, light and electromagnetic radiations are something still far away of our control and scientific knowledge, all we have is human interpretations, theories. Due each person have its specific interpretation, it becomes very difficult to establish universal definitions among the word salad of names. The rational thing to do is trying to fell the phenomena intuitively, with yours mind, without trying to translate it to human languages and is this felling that you need for gasping that the waves revealed by the electromagnetic spectrum flows in the same sequence that yours life flows during yours lifetime. As a baby you are full of non controlled energy like gamma-ray and when becomes a senior, yours energy becomes weak, like showed in the graphic.

If you think in the initial universe as the initial non-fecundated ovule. Then the spatial liquid in the ovule receipts the genomes and starts its history, you can imagine the initial universe fulfilled with a spatial dark substance ( be it called aether, dark matter, Higgs field and so on) receipting the ex-machine genome in shape of light waves. From here, calculating what each broken frequency causes to its specific portion of mass and again connecting these portions, you have a self-assembling natural working ystem. Like the fetus.

I think that our mind and not our reasoning produced by our nowaday current world view is better when grasping details of natural light because our mind could be the cloud of lightening resulting from the electrical sparkings of neuronal synapses. But... in the jungle, after losing all influences from the civilized culture, becoming a half-monkey, you feel Nature and its hidden elements in a different and more pure way. I have observed it in myself and in the behavior of wild animals.

quote:
You need to show how your "seven frequencies/vibration states of light" are fundamental to nature and not just an arbitrary human construct.

Maybe it is my arbitrary human construct, that's why I named my results as a theory ( not a scientific theory, but in the Greek sense of the word, who coined the word). It is a prediction from the theory, not an affirmation, yet, but it is falsifiable. It happens that I looked to the whole thinks we know today about this universe and I found that light waves is the unique thing that fits as the initial spark of this formula, and then, I noticed that if I put the electromagnetic spectrum upon the formula it fits very well, each point of the radioactive flow is in correspondence with each point of the circuity flow in the formula.

As said Einstein, one does not need to prove that his/her theory is the right one, only need to show that it makes sense. After that, it is hand at work testing the theory against real facts and trying experiments that could prove or debunk the predictions from the theory.

Edited by TheMatrix/DNA, : No reason given.


There was no origins of life and universe, astronomical systems are half-alive, light waves contains the code for life and DNA is not a code: Matrix/DNA Theory

This message is a reply to:
 Message 27 by Percy, posted 07-10-2015 7:48 AM Percy has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 30 by Bliyaal, posted 07-10-2015 3:17 PM TheMatrix/DNA has replied
 Message 40 by Dr Adequate, posted 07-11-2015 12:13 AM TheMatrix/DNA has replied
 Message 41 by ICANT, posted 07-11-2015 12:25 AM TheMatrix/DNA has replied
 Message 46 by Percy, posted 07-11-2015 7:53 AM TheMatrix/DNA has not replied

  
TheMatrix/DNA
Member (Idle past 824 days)
Posts: 47
From: Newark-NJ-USA
Joined: 06-05-2015


Message 32 of 149 (762304)
07-10-2015 4:23 PM
Reply to: Message 28 by New Cat's Eye
07-10-2015 11:35 AM


Re: To Cat Sci
quote:
Well that right there is a big red flag. We have a lot of people come here telling us that they have some big grand theory. The ones who end up not having anything tangible to provide are the ones who complain that its just too big and complicated to post here. That's a load of bullshit.

But... but... all current elected cosmological theories are too big and end up not having anything tangible to provide. The final word from modern Physics is the best-seller Lawrence Krauss with his "Everything from Nothing". Nothing is not tangible. Dawkins is seeing purpose and intelligence and personalization in the behavior of a punch of atoms called genes! Intelligent genes are not tangible. Hawkings is seeing ghost black holes and multiples ex-machine universes... everything not tangible.

Why and how you can say that yours modern preferred cosmological theory is not a load of bulshit... it is what I don't understand, because I am keeping in mind that my whole theory could be a load of buklshit, even after 30 years testing it, 1800 articles showing evidences, and every day finding that a prediction was right. My friend, our brain is very limited, we have no sensors for grasping more than four dimensions while the new M- theory from String theory is suggesting 11 dimensions...

When Copernicus, Galileo, Darwin, launched their theories the academic staff occupying the religious dominated universities told that their theories were a load of bulshit. We never will learn these lessons...

Everytime I see a new big theory I go crazy trying to know its details and I am grateful that there is more a human thinker searching an explanation and a guide for our life. Instead killing the author I search questions, contradictions against real facts, for helping the author to correct or improve his job.

I am asking you which points in this theory is not tangible with reality or which other theory is more tangible than this theory and why you think so. Be sure that you will be surprised by yours precipitated judgements. Instead human concepts like yours text above, please, let's go directly into real facts.

quote:
For example, the Bohr model of the atom look kinda like a solar system. You could theorize that there is some overarching phenomenon that has caused atoms and solar systems to behave in the same way. But it's really only a superficial resemblance, and without testing your theory against a null hypothesis, you're only going to be able to convince yourself that the overarching phenomenon actually exists.

Cat Sci, first of all this theory was built applying the most rational methods as comparative anatomy between all natural systems, calculus of relationships and connections among these systems based on seven variables from cosmological/biological evolution, and formal logics reinforced by stabilizing the conclusions on the solid ground of existent proved natural parameters. Now you are coming from statistical science and its private interpretation of causes and effects which points out the existence of what you call 'null hypothesis". You need point out which section of my calculus reveals a null hypothesis, for me showing to you that it is not a null hypothesis.

You brought here the Bohr model of atom and yours interpretation about it based on yours world view built by branches like statistical probability. But statistical probabilities reveals that yours interpretation of the Bohr's model is a null hypothesis because you are based on the belief that solar systems and atoms are two things such separated that has no solar system behavior equal to atom behavior. This arbitrary separation comes from a world view where all phenomenons are result of chance and random events. Since there is no way to prove that any phenomena is result of random events alone, yours is a null hypothesis.

Rationally one can not say that the behaviors of atoms and solar systems are not linked by an overarching natural force - the cosmological evolutionary process. One can not bring on the ingenuous Bohr's model of atom as proof that there is no such overarching force.

You are saying here that there is no some overarching phenomenon that has caused atoms and solar systems to behave in the same way. One can think that there is no connections between solar and atoms behavior by the same way that one can think that there is no connections between bacterias and human behaviors, if his/her world view is based in emergence of bacterias and humans from random events. But yes, there are lots of connections between bacterias and human behaviors due they are linked by the evolutionary process. If you considers the rational hypothesis that solar systems are product from atoms evolution, you will find related behaviors, no matter how long they are located in the history of evolution.

Of course, electrons does not behave like planets in the same way that the diffuse nervous system of a bacteria dos not behave like a human nervous system centralized in a brain. If one does not have electronic microscopy for seeing the shape of bacterias and try to build a model of a bacteria based on the shape of a human, this model will be far away from the truth, and this was the problem of Bohr. He intuitively felt the evolutionary correlation but couldn't calculate the reductions of the evolutionary process, so, his model was very simplistic and ingenuous.

That's why Matrix/DNA Theory is building a new atom model, different from all existent models, from Bohr to the new model produced by quantum mechanics theory. My model of atom must include the brute forces that were the principles of life's properties because atoms systems are ancestral of biological systems, and this concept is an aberration from modern Physics world view.

A big problem for Physics to accept that is an evolutionary lineage between atoms and solar system is that they does not know that there is two processes for formation of solar systems, like there are two processes for formation of cells systems. And the process applied by Nature for formation of our solar system is not the process applied for formation of atoms, like the modern process for formation of our cells is not the process applied for formation of the first cell system, which was symbiosis. But the new and different process for formation of our modern cells does not cut the evolutionary lineage between our modern cells and the first cell. Apply it to atoms/solar models and you will see the evolutionary lineage between the modern solar system behaviors and the primordial atoms systems behaviors.

In fact any new theory more accurate than the existing ones will be very complex than the existing ones, Mr. Cat Sci. Nature is very complex and it does not works the use of Occam's Razor here as the famous theorists have done for avoiding hard work.


There was no origins of life and universe, astronomical systems are half-alive, light waves contains the code for life and DNA is not a code: Matrix/DNA Theory

This message is a reply to:
 Message 28 by New Cat's Eye, posted 07-10-2015 11:35 AM New Cat's Eye has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 37 by Capt Stormfield, posted 07-10-2015 9:21 PM TheMatrix/DNA has not replied
 Message 47 by ringo, posted 07-11-2015 12:25 PM TheMatrix/DNA has replied
 Message 58 by New Cat's Eye, posted 07-12-2015 12:23 PM TheMatrix/DNA has replied

  
TheMatrix/DNA
Member (Idle past 824 days)
Posts: 47
From: Newark-NJ-USA
Joined: 06-05-2015


Message 34 of 149 (762307)
07-10-2015 5:52 PM
Reply to: Message 31 by New Cat's Eye
07-10-2015 3:38 PM


Re: To Percy
Cat Sci wrote:

quote:
I think it's time you give us something to evaluate. Your "formula" would be a good start.

Percy answered [Actually, it was Cat Sci. --Admin]:

quote:
I don't think he's talking about a mathematical equation.

Let me try another words. You know that the universal similarities among all biological systems ( aka, living beings), are existents because all biological systems are derived from a common natural formula, called DNA. Then if you draw a cell system in a transparent paper and put it over another paper with the human organism, you will notice that the configuration and internal movements are similars. If the organism have a liver for cleaning the system, the cell has the lysosome for doing the same function, and so on.

The common pattern between cells and superior organisms is the organization of mater into systems and the way that these systems works. You can draw in another sheet of paper this configuration and dynamics in shape of a formula with symbols that facilitates our job. But... when you do that, the formula fits also with the fundamental unit of information of the DNA, a lateral base-pair of nucleotides which are also the building blocks of the DNA. You discover that the same pattern is at the origins of life.

But... this pattern can not begins or finishing at life's origins.... Biological systems were produced by astronomical systems which were produced by atoms systems which were produced by electromagnetic systems... Evolution is not about the period between the primordial organic molecules and the modern complex living shapes, it is about a universal system that here is biological, at the space is mechanical, at microscopic primordial times was electromagnetic, and so on. Then it is rational that you look at those ancestral non biological systems the existence of that formula, of that pattern.

You will not find the formula in the modern current theoretical models of astronomical systems, atom systems, but you will notice that the pattern persist. For instance, cells an superior organisms have something like a nucleous and surrounding parts. Galaxies and atoms also have them. They could be very different but the pattern is there. And rationally it must be there if you suspect that there is a unique evolutionary lineage from atoms to human beings.

So, yours job is searching the biological common formula within the non-living non biological ancestor systems. Finally you get it, but you have built different theoretical models of atoms and astronomical systems. Different from the models accepted by the modern academia. And you discover that the real proved data can not debunk yours models. With time, more data is going to debunk the academic models and reinforcing yours models. Of course, you will not give up because human beings are telling that yours models are wrong.

Cat Sci wrote:

quote:
I don't think he's talking about a mathematical equation.

The Cosmos and its evolutionary history can not be translated into mathematical equations for humans to understand them. And can not be explained by Physics alone. I have at least two motives for saying that:

1) If Physics with its language and logistic called Mathematics were used by tiny microbes inside a human body believing that the human body is the Cosmos, they never would trespass the limits of the bone skeleton. When reaching the soft meat and its properties/dynamics, Physics and Math reaches its limits. And if they could reach the brain, they would have nothing to translating or to describe from it. It happens that my method is revealing that the properties and dynamics of the soft meat are parts of astronomical and atomic systems also. For instance, you can draw a systemic configuration revealing the entire reproductive sexual system in shape of a machine with non animated objects, but only biologists will see the meaning of that system, the meaning that it is a sexual reproductive system. My models are showing just that; there is a biological organization of matter covering the building block of astronomical systems composed by inanimate bodies that arises from the connections among these bodies. Physics and Math has described the skeleton of the Cosmos, but there is something else for a Theory of Everything, the something that finally produced and expressed the biological organization of matter here and now. it does not means that the Cosmos is something alive, only means that there is no natural system that is not alive, if we considers that a living thing is those that has the properties of life.

2) Mathematics can not translate the entire history of any micro evolutionary cycle, thus, can not translate the whole universe evolution. Math can translate in real grounds the initial history of an evolutionary cycle but then it stops, disappears from History, for resuscitating again at the initial phase of the next cycle. And here lays the marvellous power of math predictions: it can predicts events of the future, or events that are beyond our event horizon.

You discovers this alternate presence of Math logics in Nature when you calculates in a Cartesian graphic having as coordinates time and space and putting the first initial system arising from the Big Bang and rolling under the laws of evolution. Surprising you will get a final picture drawn inside the graphic, the picture of the DNA. Universal evolution is curve and not a linear process, like the history about an embryonary sac is not linear, it makes a general curve because the end meets the beginnings and the placenta is discarded. But the curved evolution has long slices of linear events, like the lateral streams of DNA are spiral but have long slices as linear. While this linear events are following up, Math is the useful logics for translating them to human logics, but when begins the curves, Math goes out of the highway of evolution. The surprising thing is that after the mountains, Math is back in the highway. That is why Einstein, Newton, etc., forcing the math exercise could not predict things next to us, but could predict things like universal gravitation and photoelectric effect in the sidereal space

Same way that there is no mathematical equation for representing DNA, there is no mathematical equation for representing the DNA at cosmological level, which is called Matrix/DNA formula. But, the way I put the formula the service is done.

Edited by Admin, : Fix quote.


There was no origins of life and universe, astronomical systems are half-alive, light waves contains the code for life and DNA is not a code: Matrix/DNA Theory

This message is a reply to:
 Message 31 by New Cat's Eye, posted 07-10-2015 3:38 PM New Cat's Eye has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 35 by Bliyaal, posted 07-10-2015 8:01 PM TheMatrix/DNA has not replied
 Message 36 by Capt Stormfield, posted 07-10-2015 8:49 PM TheMatrix/DNA has not replied

  
TheMatrix/DNA
Member (Idle past 824 days)
Posts: 47
From: Newark-NJ-USA
Joined: 06-05-2015


Message 43 of 149 (762333)
07-11-2015 4:05 AM
Reply to: Message 30 by Bliyaal
07-10-2015 3:17 PM


Re: To Bliyaal
quote:
Bliyaal wrote: If you want to pretend to do science, at least use the terms accordingly.
Things like this:

quote:
Matrix/DNA wrote: ... that's why I named my results as a theory ( not a scientific theory, but in the Greek sense of the word, who coined the word)

quote:
Bliyall wrote: ... makes people very suspicious here.

Why, Bliyall... it would make people very suspicious ( sorry, my keyboard has no interrogation point). I can't understand that. I pretend to know Nature in first place, this is my supreme goal. And I am alone in the jungle doing just that, asking Nature, applying methods that are not usually applied by human sciences outside the jungle. Then I got a bunch of data, tried to connect the data for seeing the big picture and the result is what I called "The Universal Matrix/DNA Formula for All Natural Systems and Life's Cycles... Theory".

Besides that, far away from the jungle, in human civilization, there was another group of people also searching data from Nature applying other method, called scientific method. They got also a big theory called the Standard Model and like my theory it has lots of sub-theories, like abiogenesis, BBT, the Nebular Model, Darwinian evolution, etc.

I did not science in the way that human species at 21 century understand it, which is very different from the way that Orionnesis from Orion, Nebula, understand Science and apply different methods. You need understand that each kind of intelligence would have different kind of science, because different brains, different sensors and different methods. For instance, ants can not understand any kind of natural phenomena if not from the optics that contains knowledge of magnetic fields, because ants have antenna. If they develops a science, the rules of science does not change, but at the beginning their scientific knowledge and methods would stands far away off the beam from the human scientific viewpoint.

What the western human science knows about the effect of each human body magnetic field affects its health... nothing. Then, the millenar diseases like cancer, diabetes, etc., caused by the body as a system, are still here. The technical instruments developed by a kind of brain are merely extensions of the brains' sensors and so, its scientific knowledge. You need be prepared because we are entering in a new big adventure, knowing another kinds of intelligence and consciousness spreaded in the Cosmos and we will face kinds of science and technology that we never could imagine before.

I am better prepared for understanding this issue due my own experience. I could feel and grasping Nature in the jungle almost like a monkey does, because my brain was washed from the human culture that I learned before. You believe that those wild natives believes in spirits and talking with elements in the jungle like trees, stones, the moon, etc, because they should be ignorant, merely imagination. it is not, they have their science based in their specific knowledge.

I pretend to do natural rational philosophy, not human science. I think the world from the systemic perspective and I apply systemic methods; human sciences think the world from the reductionist viewpoint and apply reductionist methods. The Matrix/DNA formula is the first complete working formula for natural systems that appeared in human history. While human sciences does not know completely any natural system and is talking about processes inside systems thinking that are talking about systems.

Of course the human sciences have become more powerful than mine. They are a big group, I am alone. They are rich, I have anything at hands for practicing my science in the way that my world view is suggesting. But their science is powerful for:
1) destroying their habitat,
2) for building this modern social system where 95% of the world population still are being tortured as slaves of non voluntary work. In the jungle a monkey wake up in the morning, look around and have the freedom for to choose what will do with its day; in the civilization, humans wake up in the morning and has no free will for choosing what to do, they are pushed like cows to a unique destiny where they will not see the light of the Sun. Who has the better science is who is more happy and adapted to natural conditions.

3) for abortion of this embryo of consciousness that is being nurtured inside every human head and enslaving it forever. We were materially created by the most perfect machine in this world, which is described by Newtonian mechanics. This machine is inside us as genetic code and is surrounding us, as the constructor of our biosphere. This machine is driven biological evolution for to reproduce itself here, the whole biosphere as an ordered machine and humans as pieces of this machine. Which will be the Brave New World under the Orwellian Big Queen, like any insect societies were driven to. The embryo of consciousness will be imprisoned before reaching its maturity.

No my friend, I do not pretend to do human science. I do not pretend to be another guilty by this absurd human condition today and its dark future. I pretend to bring the seed of a new different kind of science and scientific method, one that never was experienced before by human beings, because I am sure that worst than this one that is being practiced today it is not. It is a dream, I do not believe that I will get it because I have nothing at hands and my voice is not listened from the jungle neither when I am in New York, and I am at the end of my forces... but I will dye trying it because Humanity is the unique thing that I love in this world and I can't stop to fight against its enemies. The worst enemy of human kind is inside us, surrounding us and its name is the dark face of the cosmological Matrix, its face as selfish closed system. It felt from the sky about 4 billion years ago and it is going to fall again due keeping the same sin... and here, the biblical tale was pretty right.


There was no origins of life and universe, astronomical systems are half-alive, light waves contains the code for life and DNA is not a code: Matrix/DNA Theory

This message is a reply to:
 Message 30 by Bliyaal, posted 07-10-2015 3:17 PM Bliyaal has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 52 by Bliyaal, posted 07-11-2015 6:41 PM TheMatrix/DNA has not replied

  
TheMatrix/DNA
Member (Idle past 824 days)
Posts: 47
From: Newark-NJ-USA
Joined: 06-05-2015


Message 44 of 149 (762334)
07-11-2015 4:52 AM
Reply to: Message 42 by Dr Adequate
07-11-2015 1:46 AM


To Dr Adequate
quote:
Bring me the finest popcorn in all the land.

You will have it. My lovely Almighty Lord Pink Unicorn told that he like you too and will give to you pink popcorn in the paradise for all eternity. You must come with us believing in the unique god Pink Unicorn. Think pink because the Universe is pink. Cheers...


There was no origins of life and universe, astronomical systems are half-alive, light waves contains the code for life and DNA is not a code: Matrix/DNA Theory

This message is a reply to:
 Message 42 by Dr Adequate, posted 07-11-2015 1:46 AM Dr Adequate has not replied

  
TheMatrix/DNA
Member (Idle past 824 days)
Posts: 47
From: Newark-NJ-USA
Joined: 06-05-2015


Message 45 of 149 (762335)
07-11-2015 5:54 AM
Reply to: Message 40 by Dr Adequate
07-11-2015 12:13 AM


Re: To Dr Adequate
quote:
And yet you are trying to translate it into human language despite your own doubts about the rationality of the attempt. Well, apparently your doubts were well-founded, since we cannot understand your translation from feeling into language. Nor does cause us to have the same feeling as you have. If you want to achieve that, try writing a poem, a kōan, an aphorism, or a really good joke: these are hit-and-miss methods, but they are occasionally effective. But your unmeaning jumble of scientific terminology just brings on the feeling that is usually brought on by reading an unmeaning jumble of scientific terminology.

Dr. Adequate, the dialogue between two different cultures and two different hard-wired brains is very difficult and painful. I am telling that you are interpreting several natural phenomena and events in the wrong way for tying to keep you interested in the dialogue and because the way that you are behaving due yours interpretations are prejudices to my life.

It is difficult in the beginnings of the talking because we need to learn the other language for begin to understand the meaning of his/her words. For easing yours way I am trying to use yours terminology, not because I approve this terminology. For instance we can talk about the period of abiogenesis using this word that is yours terminology but I don't approve the word because in my world view there was no abiogenesis. I cal that period as "mutated cosmological embryogenesis". I my world view life did not came from the abiotic matter of this planet because this matter and the planet itself was merely parts of a system, and life must came from another system. But if I talk it, I will need to explain that I have a different model of astronomical system and showing to you where were each lifes properties at that model, for advocating my theory that it was a half-biological system. But for explaining it I would need to explain my different model of cells systems and its organelles, and after that my different model of the building block of DNA. Then, at the same time I would talking about ribosomes, guanine, pulsars, the pion between protons and neutrons... they are all correlated.

This is the language of the systemic viewpoint which is very different of the language that you are used to have, from the reductionist viewpoint. If I was talking with another systemologist things would be easy, I don't need remember that ribosomes produces proteins due the same function that planets produces biological diversity. The systemologist already knows what is systemic function and all material representative of each function in each system. You are not trained for it.

I told that first ( in the jungle) I try to fell the phenomena avoiding to write it for avoiding to translate it into human language. I should say human culture instead human language. It is because the milenar human culture of 10 or 20.000 years is an accumulation of errors and if you bring on the new phenomena into this culture, you will make the usual distortion of human culture and will go in a wrong way. You will be driven for to fit in the box.

So, first I built the theory alone with the wild Nature, I forgot that was a human being and the human culture. Only after having the whole theory I left the jungle and now I am putting over the table the Matrix/DNA culture side by side with the human culture and trying to translate it to human language, using its own terminology. It is very difficult and doing a lot of mistakes but i don't know another way for telling you that there are different interpretations of a given phenomena, like abiogenesis and mutated cosmological embryogenesis.

For continuing the dialogue it is necessary that every time you think that something is an unmeaning jumble of scientific terminology you stop me and say that. My first reaction will be bringing on over the table the real proved known fact that is the foundation of what I am talking about.

Our two different feelings about a unique natural phenomena is due the relativism between two different observers located at different point in time and space. Yours feeling is from the space of urban modern life while mine is from the wild jungle; yours is from the urban city of the 21 century while mine is the state of nature at million or billion years ago.


There was no origins of life and universe, astronomical systems are half-alive, light waves contains the code for life and DNA is not a code: Matrix/DNA Theory

This message is a reply to:
 Message 40 by Dr Adequate, posted 07-11-2015 12:13 AM Dr Adequate has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 48 by Dr Adequate, posted 07-11-2015 3:21 PM TheMatrix/DNA has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.1
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2022