Phat writes:
Your entire mental thought process requires hard evidence before you even entertain the idea of belief.
This is another thing that I can keep repeating as long as you keep getting it wrong. We should always, always, always require hard evidence before even entertaining the possibility of belief. That includes you. Otherwise you'll believe every UFO and Bigfoot and bat-baby story you hear.
Phat writes:
Since you have yet to find satisfactory evidence for a God or for Jesus being a living Spirit today, you resort to the only evidence you have...the book which describes it all (except for later added dogma) and you limit any possibility of belief by the common error of "putting God in a box" or book, as it were.
It isn't "resorting" to the book. You need to understand that the book is the only real source that you have for your belief. In
Message 129 I asked you how else you would even know anything about Jesus. In
Message 130 you said you'd use the same method as the authors of the book. But they were
there. At least they heard the stories second-hand and third-hand from people who were there. You are not hearing the stories twentieth and thirtieth hand from people who were there. You're only hearing them from the book.
So don't be so quick to throw the book away just because you don't like what it says.
Phat writes:
I can see why your arguments are framed the way that they are.
Clearly not. You keep getting it wrong every time.
Phat writes:
Socialism without woo is worse than the gulag, I swear.
That's just a really stupid thing to say. You should apologise for wasting my time with that.
And our geese will blot out the sun.