Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,914 Year: 4,171/9,624 Month: 1,042/974 Week: 1/368 Day: 1/11 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Cali Supreme Court ruling on legality of same-sex marriage ban
Fosdick 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5530 days)
Posts: 1793
From: Upper Slobovia
Joined: 12-11-2006


Message 45 of 448 (466954)
05-18-2008 8:37 PM
Reply to: Message 44 by subbie
05-18-2008 8:26 PM


Re: Just take "marriage" out of the law
subbie, come with me across the Heartland of America, from sea to shining sea, and let's visit every farmhouse together and ask those fine people one question: Mr. and Mrs. Jones, do you believe that the institution of marriage, "holy matrimony," would suffer if gays were allow to get married?" And then let's have a beer in New York and tally up the results. Any bets on what they might be?
This issue makes bigots out of a lot of good people.
”HM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 44 by subbie, posted 05-18-2008 8:26 PM subbie has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 46 by subbie, posted 05-18-2008 8:42 PM Fosdick has replied

Fosdick 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5530 days)
Posts: 1793
From: Upper Slobovia
Joined: 12-11-2006


Message 49 of 448 (466959)
05-18-2008 8:55 PM
Reply to: Message 47 by Granny Magda
05-18-2008 8:46 PM


Re: Just take "marriage" out of the law
Granny, you've gone hysterical. I haven't harmed any gay people yet. And your said post way back when is too complicated for me to deal with, given the lead in my bigoted bidge. Can you pose a simpler question for your elderly victim?
”HM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 47 by Granny Magda, posted 05-18-2008 8:46 PM Granny Magda has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 75 by Granny Magda, posted 05-19-2008 10:13 AM Fosdick has replied

Fosdick 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5530 days)
Posts: 1793
From: Upper Slobovia
Joined: 12-11-2006


Message 50 of 448 (466960)
05-18-2008 8:58 PM
Reply to: Message 48 by Taz
05-18-2008 8:47 PM


Re: Just take "marriage" out of the law
Taz writes:
You have any idea how hard it is for gay people to adopt?
Wonder why. Kooties?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 48 by Taz, posted 05-18-2008 8:47 PM Taz has not replied

Fosdick 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5530 days)
Posts: 1793
From: Upper Slobovia
Joined: 12-11-2006


Message 52 of 448 (466962)
05-18-2008 9:02 PM
Reply to: Message 46 by subbie
05-18-2008 8:42 PM


Re: Just take "marriage" out of the law
subbie writes:
Are you agreeing that there's no basis for opposing it than bigotry?
Sorry, subbie, but I can't agree. You can't call Mr. and Mrs, John bigots; they are the core of America, and it's a matter of opinion anyway. Take a vote. If you believe in democracy you can't negate the opinions of Mr. and Mrs. Jones.
”HM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 46 by subbie, posted 05-18-2008 8:42 PM subbie has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 54 by subbie, posted 05-18-2008 9:11 PM Fosdick has replied

Fosdick 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5530 days)
Posts: 1793
From: Upper Slobovia
Joined: 12-11-2006


Message 56 of 448 (466968)
05-18-2008 9:18 PM
Reply to: Message 55 by iano
05-18-2008 9:13 PM


Re: Just take "marriage" out of the law
Way to go, iano!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 55 by iano, posted 05-18-2008 9:13 PM iano has not replied

Fosdick 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5530 days)
Posts: 1793
From: Upper Slobovia
Joined: 12-11-2006


Message 60 of 448 (466972)
05-18-2008 9:31 PM
Reply to: Message 54 by subbie
05-18-2008 9:11 PM


Re: Just take "marriage" out of the law
subbie writes:
How is not allowing them to do that for no reason other than religious prejudice not bigotry?
OK, so we're all bigots, even the atheists. We can handle that.
subbie, here a test on prejudice for you: If you parented four children wouldn't you hope that two were gay? After all, they're good people, too, who deserve equal rights and equal love. Would you have hopes for the homosexuality of your children that equal those for heterosexuality?
If you fail this test, subbie, I might call you a bigot.
”HM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 54 by subbie, posted 05-18-2008 9:11 PM subbie has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 62 by subbie, posted 05-18-2008 9:45 PM Fosdick has replied

Fosdick 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5530 days)
Posts: 1793
From: Upper Slobovia
Joined: 12-11-2006


Message 78 of 448 (467059)
05-19-2008 11:02 AM
Reply to: Message 62 by subbie
05-18-2008 9:45 PM


Re: Just take "marriage" out of the law
subbie, your responded to my test question:
If you parented four children wouldn't you hope that two were gay? After all, they're good people, too, who deserve equal rights and equal love. Would you have hopes for the homosexuality of your children that equal those for heterosexuality?
this way:
I have a son. I hope he's not gay. My main reason for doing so is that I'm quite certain he would have considerable pain and unhappiness in his life as a result of being gay that he would not have if he's straight. I will admit, secondarily, that I would be disappointed, in that it would be unlikely that he would have any natural born children, that I wouldn't have any grandchildren to spoil in my dotage...
Although you are honest and sincere, you have revealed a prejudice against homosexuality. That is the prerequisite of bigotry. But I don't regard you as a bigot anymore than I regard myself as such. We're both realistic about homosexuality: it's an aberration of choice. And now they're making laws to accommodate that aberrattion as if they are ramping the curbs for crippled people.
How would you answer your own question, HM?
Same as you, mostly. And I support their right to choose. But I don't support any special rights to choose, like maybe a special right granted to the Hells Angeles to not to wear helmets if they don't want to.
How about a special law for old people that protects their rights to suicide if that's what they choose to do? Don't you think that once you age past 70 you ought to be able to choose when you die, legally? Yes, I know you'll say it's OT, but it's not. We're talking here about making laws to protect aberrant choices.
”HM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 62 by subbie, posted 05-18-2008 9:45 PM subbie has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 84 by subbie, posted 05-19-2008 12:47 PM Fosdick has replied
 Message 90 by bluescat48, posted 05-19-2008 3:22 PM Fosdick has replied

Fosdick 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5530 days)
Posts: 1793
From: Upper Slobovia
Joined: 12-11-2006


Message 79 of 448 (467060)
05-19-2008 11:12 AM
Reply to: Message 75 by Granny Magda
05-19-2008 10:13 AM


Re: Just take "marriage" out of the law
GM writes:
Do you think that the California Supreme Court got this decision right?
No, they missed the part about separating government from religion. The government should get out of the marriage business and focus on civil unions.
If not, where, in US law, do you think they got it wrong?
Easy, as I have stated in Message 38: The First Amendement”"Congress shall make no laws respecting an establishment of religion..."
”HM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 75 by Granny Magda, posted 05-19-2008 10:13 AM Granny Magda has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 80 by Granny Magda, posted 05-19-2008 11:42 AM Fosdick has replied

Fosdick 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5530 days)
Posts: 1793
From: Upper Slobovia
Joined: 12-11-2006


Message 81 of 448 (467063)
05-19-2008 12:13 PM
Reply to: Message 80 by Granny Magda
05-19-2008 11:42 AM


Re: Just take "marriage" out of the law
GM writes:
For God's sake, wouldn't it be simpler to just let gays marry and stop interfering in other people's lives?
Oh, Granny, let's do what subbie and I did, take a cruise across America and ask a simple question of Mr. and Mrs. Jones, our model married couple: "Does the legalization of "gay marriage" interfere in any way with your own marriage?" We'll keep score, go have a cocktail, and ask ourselves two questions: Whose opinion on this matter counts most: the vast majority or the slim minority? And what's the meaning of democracy?
Come on, Granny, we can stay in Motel 8s.
”HM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 80 by Granny Magda, posted 05-19-2008 11:42 AM Granny Magda has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 82 by Granny Magda, posted 05-19-2008 12:27 PM Fosdick has replied
 Message 89 by Rahvin, posted 05-19-2008 3:03 PM Fosdick has replied

Fosdick 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5530 days)
Posts: 1793
From: Upper Slobovia
Joined: 12-11-2006


Message 83 of 448 (467070)
05-19-2008 12:44 PM
Reply to: Message 82 by Granny Magda
05-19-2008 12:27 PM


Re: Just take "marriage" out of the law
GM writes:
Since your hypothetical bigots would be unable to demonstrate any material instance where gay marriage interferes with their lives (beyond "Eww, that's icky") it hardly matters.
That's fluff, Granny. It's matter of opinion, and you're so opinionated on the matter that you're playing the bigot card. Makes me wonder just who is the real bigot. Let's be real; it's only a matter of opinion. And when the U.S. Supreme Court is called upon to render its opinion, what do you suppose that will be?
I knew a large-dog person once who hated small-dog people. And I knew a small-dog person who felt the same about large-dog people. And then I knew a person once who didn't like any kind of dog people. They all had one thing in common, though: they all called each other "bigots."
”HM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 82 by Granny Magda, posted 05-19-2008 12:27 PM Granny Magda has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 88 by Granny Magda, posted 05-19-2008 1:24 PM Fosdick has not replied

Fosdick 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5530 days)
Posts: 1793
From: Upper Slobovia
Joined: 12-11-2006


Message 86 of 448 (467075)
05-19-2008 1:07 PM
Reply to: Message 84 by subbie
05-19-2008 12:47 PM


Re: Just take "marriage" out of the law
subbie writes:
Could you decide all of a sudden that your passion is inflamed by taking a cruise up the Hershey Highway? Neither could I.
Gosh, subbie, I don't think that one helped your argument very much, but I liked its visual value. By imposing gay marriage under the law you would be imposing a special exemption to the traditional value of marriage. But it's a fig in fir tree. A tempest in a teapot. And until the government reverts to something other than a democracy, majority rules. And until the First Amendment is suspended, we have a separation of church and state.
I've never said gays shouldn't be married. I'm only saying that the law doesn't need to be involved.
”HM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 84 by subbie, posted 05-19-2008 12:47 PM subbie has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 95 by lyx2no, posted 05-19-2008 5:09 PM Fosdick has replied

Fosdick 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5530 days)
Posts: 1793
From: Upper Slobovia
Joined: 12-11-2006


Message 92 of 448 (467107)
05-19-2008 4:11 PM
Reply to: Message 90 by bluescat48
05-19-2008 3:22 PM


Re: Just take "marriage" out of the law
bluecat48 writes:
Where is your proof that homosexuality is an "aberration of choice?"
quote:
aberration |‘abr sh n|
noun
a departure from what is normal, usual, or expected, typically one that is unwelcome
  —Oxford
Didn't subbie already testified that he would not welcome homosexuality in his children, but he would love them anyway? He didn't want that kind aberration. If you say it's not an aberration then you don't understand the term. Would you want any of your children to turn out gay? Be honest.
Now, I don't need to define "choice." We know what that is. If there is some biological reason that people become gay without choice then please bring it forward. Personally, I think there is a biological reason, but it seems to be elusive and no confirmable gene has been discovered. Perhaps it's hormonal/developmental. But, more likely, confused youngsters dabble with it like they dabble with drugs and alcohol. And dabbling choice, is it not?
Thus gays engage in an "aberration of choice." And perhaps you have prejudices you're unwilling to face up to.
”HM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 90 by bluescat48, posted 05-19-2008 3:22 PM bluescat48 has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 94 by subbie, posted 05-19-2008 4:24 PM Fosdick has replied
 Message 96 by Phalanx, posted 05-19-2008 5:34 PM Fosdick has not replied
 Message 107 by FliesOnly, posted 05-20-2008 1:51 PM Fosdick has replied
 Message 134 by Larni, posted 05-21-2008 8:58 AM Fosdick has replied

Fosdick 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5530 days)
Posts: 1793
From: Upper Slobovia
Joined: 12-11-2006


Message 93 of 448 (467109)
05-19-2008 4:20 PM
Reply to: Message 89 by Rahvin
05-19-2008 3:03 PM


Re: Just take "marriage" out of the law
rahvin writes:
Isn't it a very good thing that the US is not actually a true democracy? I sure think so. I mean, it's a Very Bad Thing to be any sort of minority, gay or otherwise, when all legal concerns are strictly a matter of how many people agree with you.
I rather like the fact that we have a Constitution, a Judicial branch to make sure that we don't legislate anything that contradicts it, and the other checks and balances in our government that prevent the tyranny of the majority.
Then how in hell did we get ourselves into Iraq to kill its dictator and propagate democracy? Where were the legislative and judicial branches when we needed them? Wasn't there a vote in Congress? Come on, rahvin, we have to deal with majority-rule politics to run this country, even if it is not a pure democracy, and even if the majority is wrong.
”HM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 89 by Rahvin, posted 05-19-2008 3:03 PM Rahvin has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 97 by Rahvin, posted 05-19-2008 5:37 PM Fosdick has replied

Fosdick 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5530 days)
Posts: 1793
From: Upper Slobovia
Joined: 12-11-2006


Message 98 of 448 (467141)
05-19-2008 7:35 PM
Reply to: Message 94 by subbie
05-19-2008 4:24 PM


Re: Just take "marriage" out of the law
subbie writes:
I must reply to your latest slander upon me.
You're over-reacting. Here's what you said in Message 62:
I have a son. I hope he's not gay. My main reason for doing so is that I'm quite certain he would have considerable pain and unhappiness in his life as a result of being gay that he would not have if he's straight. I will admit, secondarily, that I would be disappointed, in that it would be unlikely that he would have any natural born children, that I wouldn't have any grandchildren to spoil in my dotage.
Then here's what I said in Message 92:
Didn't subbie already testified that he would not welcome homosexuality in his children, but he would love them anyway?
What's slandering about that? And then I said:
He didn't want that kind aberration.
Is that the slander you claim? If so, I don't get it, because I didn't think you wanted that kind of aberration.
I never said I didn't want "that kind of aberration" in my family. In fact, I actually said it wasn't an aberration. You are the only person to use that bigotry in this thread.
Then what is it? It isn't normal. It looks like an aberration to me. You're not being honest because you have already admitted that homosexuality is not equal in your eyes to heterosexuality in terms what you would prefer for your children.
And get off the bigotry band wagon. Save it for a better cause.
If you slander me further, I will ask for your suspension.
I heard your mother was a Nazi.
”HM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 94 by subbie, posted 05-19-2008 4:24 PM subbie has not replied

Fosdick 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5530 days)
Posts: 1793
From: Upper Slobovia
Joined: 12-11-2006


Message 99 of 448 (467142)
05-19-2008 7:38 PM
Reply to: Message 95 by lyx2no
05-19-2008 5:09 PM


Re: Just take "marriage" out of the law
lyx2no writes:
It's a constitutional republic. It was so constructed that's we might avoid the tyranny of the majority.
I should have know that. So how does this republic work if it doesn't run on democracy?
”HM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 95 by lyx2no, posted 05-19-2008 5:09 PM lyx2no has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 101 by Taz, posted 05-19-2008 7:50 PM Fosdick has replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024