|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
Thread ▼ Details |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: The bible and abortion | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
nator Member (Idle past 2200 days) Posts: 12961 From: Ann Arbor Joined: |
quote: Several things... 1) I challenge you to show me any major pro-choice organization which promotes a casual attitude towards abortion. 2) If someone has such a casual attitude towards abortion, do you really want them raising a child?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
nator Member (Idle past 2200 days) Posts: 12961 From: Ann Arbor Joined: |
quote: Bud didn't you just say that abortion is wrong, "Whatever the mother feels or suffers."? It surely seems that you have no problem with a woman suffering any amount of pain as long as you deem her somehow "deserving" of it. Condoms break. Birth control (even the pill) fails. People are irresponsible and make mistakes. Did you know that most underage girls who get pregnant are knocked up by much older men? It seems to me that you are focusing a great deal on blaming the women and girls for these unwanted pregnancies and speaking not at all about the men who get the women and girls preganant. Did you know that getting an abortion is much safer to the woman's health than carrying a child to term and giving birth to it?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
nator Member (Idle past 2200 days) Posts: 12961 From: Ann Arbor Joined: |
quote: Inconvenience? Your repeated implication that women are interested mainly in "convenience" with regards to abortion is insulting and belittling to all the women who do not take aborting a fetus lightly and struggle with the descision to have an abortion or not. It is much more risky to a woman's health to carry a baby to term and give birth to it than it is for her to have a properly-performed abortion. [This message has been edited by schrafinator, 09-25-2003]
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
nator Member (Idle past 2200 days) Posts: 12961 From: Ann Arbor Joined: |
quote: I have a question for you. How many unwanted, parentless babies have you adopted? If you haven't done so, why not? If it is simply a matter of a little "inconvenience", then most of us would have adopted a couple orphans at least, right? Kind of like getting a dog from the pound. If you have, then do you consider the child an inconvenience, or a major, life-altering addition to your world which has rendered said world changed in drastic ways, forever? Also, why do you refuse to address the fact that carrying a pregnancy to term and giving birth is much more dangerous to a woman's health that undergoing a properly-performed abortion? [This message has been edited by schrafinator, 09-26-2003]
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
nator Member (Idle past 2200 days) Posts: 12961 From: Ann Arbor Joined: |
quote: Not true. There are plenty of children waiting to be adopted in the UK. I did a little research and it seems as though the reason it takes so long to adopt a child in the UK is because of beurocratic red tape and restrictive laws, not because of a lack of children in the system. Blair vows to increase number of adoptions | Health | The Guardian
quote: quote: quote: quote: I think changing to "permenant, drastic, major, life-altering lifestyle choice" would make me happy. It would be a great deal more accurate than calling raising a child an "inconvenience."
quote: Yes you do. She told you about it on this thread. On the other hand, it's irrelevant who you know or don't know.
quote: Then you haven't been paying attention in the thread. I'm not saying that this is the most stated reason for having an abortion, but it is a significant factor for some women.
quote: Who are you to decide that a woman should be forced by law to be subjected to any "health risk", no matter how mild? You really don't know how hard pregnancy and birth can be on a woman's body, or how dangerous to her life it can be, do you? Attention Required! | Cloudflare
quote: quote: [This message has been edited by schrafinator, 09-29-2003] [This message has been edited by schrafinator, 09-29-2003] [This message has been edited by schrafinator, 09-29-2003]
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
nator Member (Idle past 2200 days) Posts: 12961 From: Ann Arbor Joined: |
It's taking me a long time and a bunch of edits to get my reply to Mr. Jack the way I want it, so you responded to something I have edited out!
Anyhow, I agree completely, although it's also true that when the agencies get to pick the parents, they can be picky, too.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
nator Member (Idle past 2200 days) Posts: 12961 From: Ann Arbor Joined: |
quote: What's a human being?
quote: Scratch the surface of any pro-lifer (which I know you aren't, but you do share some similar attitudes) and you'll find someone who wants to punish women for their sexual behavior.
quote: Hello? Did she get pregnant all by herself? What about the person with the sperm? Why have you not said a single disparaging thing about all of the FATHERS of these unwanted pregnancies? I don't see these men lining up to be single fathers, do you?
quote: No disagreement.
quote: Didn't you read my statistics? Death from normal pregnancy is many times more likely than death from safe and legal abortion.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
nator Member (Idle past 2200 days) Posts: 12961 From: Ann Arbor Joined: |
quote: Well, I sort of agree and sort of don't. I certainly do agree that there are plenty of anti-abortion folks who believe that life begins at conception, end of story, but you also don't ever hear those people talking about all of the fertilized eggs that never get implanted. If we take their definition of "life", and take their lead on what measures should be taken to preserve it, all menstrual fluid from all fertile women should be preserved and examined for those fertilized eggs. So, ultimately, it is not "life" as they define it, that they are primarily interested in. What they are interested in is controlling women's bodies as incubators regardless of the women's desire to be an incubator. They have raised the rights of the fertilized egg or zygote or fetus above those of the woman. The vast majority of "life begins at conception" folks are fundamentalist Christians, whom do not have a history of smiling upon anyone, least of all women, who have sex outside of marriage. Certainly, they point to sexual activity outside of marriage as the main reason abortion happens. Therefore I don't really think it's too much of a stretch to conclude that they want to blame women for having sex. The pro-lifers never have much to say about the males.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
nator Member (Idle past 2200 days) Posts: 12961 From: Ann Arbor Joined: |
quote: I remember wathing a really, really good (PBS?) documentary on the abortion debate. They made a great effort to get mostly rational, reasonable women on both sides of the issue. The film was a series of interviews of women over a pretty long time span...I'll say a year. I am thinking that they were all part of a group that wanted to sit down with each other and attempt to calmly discuss the issue. Anyway, although I'm probably remembering things incorrectly, I do remember one really kind-seeming anti-abortion woman, at the end of the film, breaking down in tears and obvious anguish, because due to her experiences in the group and the people she spoke to and the stories she heard, realized that some abortions really were necessary. She was the only one, though.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
nator Member (Idle past 2200 days) Posts: 12961 From: Ann Arbor Joined: |
Jezz, no!
I NEVER SCREAM!!!
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
nator Member (Idle past 2200 days) Posts: 12961 From: Ann Arbor Joined: |
quote: But didn't you already say that in the case of rape that a woman's DOES have the right to make the personal descision to terminate the pregnancy? I fail to see why there is any difference if your main consideration is the life of the fetus.
quote: Bud didn't you already say that terminating fetuses with birth defects of genetic disease would be a "better result" than "being born and living their life?"
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
nator Member (Idle past 2200 days) Posts: 12961 From: Ann Arbor Joined: |
quote: I don't think this is correct from a legal standpoint, but even if it were, how does this relate to the discussion here?
quote: You are assuming that women are incapable of finding out information all on their own. Besides that, at least in the US women are given lots of information.
quote: They do? Care to document this assertion?
quote: This is a myth that has been repeated by anti-choice people even though the science suggests no correlatiopn between induced abortion and breast cancer: Attention Required! | Cloudflare While researchers do not know what causes breast cancer, reproductive factors have been associated with risk for the disease since the 17th century, when breast cancer was noted to be more prevalent among nuns. It is known that having a full-term pregnancy early in a woman's childbearing years is protective against breast cancer, and some studies have also indicated that breastfeeding, especially in women who are young when they give birth, may reduce a woman's risk of developing the disease. A woman's age at menarche and menopause also influence her risk for breast cancer, with earlier onset of regular menstrual cycles and later age at menopause associated with higher risk (Kelsey & Gammon, 1991). However, the best available evidence ? from large population-based cohort studies ? shows no net effect that induced abortion places women at increased risk for developing breast cancer (Bartholomew & Grimes, 1998).
quote: They do.
quote: That's because the science doesn't show a link.
quote: I am not sure at which a fertilized egg, collection of cells, zygote, becomes human. Do you believe that fertilized eggs are human? If so, dod you know that most fertilized eggs are flushed out of the women's system becayse they failed to implant?
quote: Abortion has probably been around just as long as adoption, maybe longer. Women have been using herbs and other dangerous methods to induce abortion for thousands and thousands of years. In fact, abortion was legal and fairly common in the US until the late 1800's, when laws started to be passed against it.
quote: Excuse me? Are you actually trying to tell me that there are NO children waiting to be adopted in your country?!
quote: Um, where are you getting your information? It is very inaccurate. I suggest not just swallowing what people with a religious agenda feed you when it comes to facts you can look up. CDC - Page Not Found The abortion ratio for 1999 is the lowest reported since 1975.The ratio was 256 legal induced abortions per 1,000 live births, compared to 264 in 1998. Lower abortion rates, and we still have thousands and thousands of hungry children and unwanted children in foster care.
quote: Nobody likes abortion, defender. However, the people who want to make it illegal are the same people who do everything in their power to keep sex education out of schools, who oppose condom distribution in schools, etc. They say they want to protect all the unborn babies, but refuse to take realistic measures to prevent their creation in the first place. Finally, I'd like to know if you advocate making abortion illegal.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
nator Member (Idle past 2200 days) Posts: 12961 From: Ann Arbor Joined: |
Mice eat their own young.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
nator Member (Idle past 2200 days) Posts: 12961 From: Ann Arbor Joined: |
quote: So can lots of other mammals, including humans.
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024