Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,879 Year: 4,136/9,624 Month: 1,007/974 Week: 334/286 Day: 55/40 Hour: 0/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   For those concerned with Free Speech (or Porn), it is time to get active.
gnojek
Inactive Member


Message 172 of 304 (220531)
06-28-2005 4:01 PM
Reply to: Message 92 by nator
06-28-2005 8:17 AM


Re: Ted Bundy
I also seem to recall that watching porn makes many men less satisfied and more critical of their partner's body, and makes many women more critical of their own bodies.
he he
My girlfriend and I watch porn together all the time.
Actually, most of the girls in porn these days make me totally appreciate my girfriend. She's way more attractive than the large majority of these girls. (especially the ones with fake boobs, yeach..)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 92 by nator, posted 06-28-2005 8:17 AM nator has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 173 by Chiroptera, posted 06-28-2005 4:06 PM gnojek has replied
 Message 181 by nator, posted 06-28-2005 6:20 PM gnojek has replied

gnojek
Inactive Member


Message 176 of 304 (220537)
06-28-2005 4:27 PM
Reply to: Message 99 by Faith
06-28-2005 8:57 AM


This is totally off topic.
The West has been so prosperous because of our basic adherence to God's Law, including sexual propriety and respect. That's going now, that's my point. All that is going since the sixties, so I guess we can look forward to becoming some version of a third world country, if we continue to exist at all that is.
You have really got to be joking.
What made European countries so successful was technology, mainly military technology like gunpowder and advanced warships.
Are you telling me that it was because of obedience to the will of God that these things were developed and used?
Are you saying that it was God's will to commit genocide and subjugate native people's lands?
China also had a lot of similar technology and was far ahead of the west culturally and technologically for a really long time, all without "obeying God's will" (you know that's what Islam means as a word right?). But they just happened to like to keep to themselves (mostly), so no colonialism.
Are you saying that European colonialism was due to God's will? True, all of these jokers were stealing gold, land, and other resources in the name of God and/or the Church, but to say that this type of mass murder is God's will is plain silly.
Actually, I take that back. It's the OT God's way of doing things, for sure.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 99 by Faith, posted 06-28-2005 8:57 AM Faith has not replied

gnojek
Inactive Member


Message 177 of 304 (220543)
06-28-2005 4:48 PM


I'd like to address the degradation thing.
Surely, some porn degrades people. But, as has been stated earlier, lots of popular culture degrades people, and usually the people are very willing to be degraded.
BUT, I don't see most porn as being degrading.
I think perhaps degradation is in the eye of the beholder.
When I see people on their knees in front of a pulpit with a preacher's shaking hand clasped to their heads muttering in tongues, I see that as utterly degrading.
When I see someone like Benny Hinn calling old people up to the front to be a spectacle, that's completely disgusting and degrading to those people.
I really thing we need to strictly regulate evengelism, especially the genre of "faith healing" whose main theme is degradation of people.

Replies to this message:
 Message 184 by robinrohan, posted 06-28-2005 6:29 PM gnojek has not replied

gnojek
Inactive Member


Message 281 of 304 (221961)
07-05-2005 6:01 PM
Reply to: Message 173 by Chiroptera
06-28-2005 4:06 PM


Re: Ted Bundy
Do you watch the porn that has all those underage illegal immigrants?
That is my favorite section at the video store.
Do you feel the urge to go on a serial killing rampage?
Only a little.
Then my dog talks me down.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 173 by Chiroptera, posted 06-28-2005 4:06 PM Chiroptera has not replied

gnojek
Inactive Member


Message 282 of 304 (221969)
07-05-2005 6:19 PM
Reply to: Message 181 by nator
06-28-2005 6:20 PM


Re: Ted Bundy
Well, we've been going out for a few years now, and since then she's put some meat on her bones, but whatever, so have I.
That's really not what I'm talking about I guess.
I think if I met any of these porn stars in real life I wouldn't really be attracted to any of them. As porn stars they have this porn star look, that in real life is pretty much a turn off.
It's like strip clubs. I'll go to one if "the guys" want to. I'll tag along, but the vast majority of strippers have that same layer of skank on them that a lot of porn star women have. It's just this persona that works on screen or maybe even on stage, but in person, it's a turn off (to me anyway, each to his own). And, of course, there are some girls that I find to be "more" attractive than my gf, but even so, who cares?
What's the difference with non-porn celebrities, etc. Jessica Alba is way hotter, but it doesn't make me think less of my girl.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 181 by nator, posted 06-28-2005 6:20 PM nator has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 289 by nator, posted 07-05-2005 7:05 PM gnojek has replied

gnojek
Inactive Member


Message 283 of 304 (221973)
07-05-2005 6:25 PM
Reply to: Message 194 by crashfrog
06-28-2005 10:10 PM


Re: Ted Bundy
Models are born with the latter, and their job is to develop the former (which they are obviously very good at). Porn actresses are usually women who lack the latter and try to make up for it with the former. (Not in all cases.) And very often really attractive-yet-shy women, who don't consider themselves attractive despite entreaties from others that they are, are born with often-times considerable natural attractiveness, but who - for very valid reasons - have underdeveloped skills in the other departments. (Tends to be the girl geeks.)
I think you really nailed it here.
Yes, most porn women are ugly underneath the "work".
I HATE most of it, like make-up and fancy hairdos etc in most circumstances.
I guess that's why I like my gf so much, she's one of those "girl geeks" I guess, but is attractive without trying too hard.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 194 by crashfrog, posted 06-28-2005 10:10 PM crashfrog has not replied

gnojek
Inactive Member


Message 286 of 304 (221978)
07-05-2005 6:40 PM
Reply to: Message 256 by Silent H
06-30-2005 8:38 AM


Re: Playboy
And 40% does not at all suggest that and ideal is presented for blondes.
Hef seems to have a thing for blondes and mainly bleached blondes.
He has a thing for really red lipstick and huge lips, injected or not.
And he has a thing for big tits, fake or not.
The 40% being some form of "blonde" is no accident.
All Hef's girlfriends die their hair blonde and look a certain way.
It's what Hef likes and it's what ends up in Playboy.
I mean, would Anna Nicole Smith be called a "star" in any other magazine? The woman is atrocious.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 256 by Silent H, posted 06-30-2005 8:38 AM Silent H has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 301 by Silent H, posted 07-06-2005 6:56 AM gnojek has not replied

gnojek
Inactive Member


Message 287 of 304 (221980)
07-05-2005 6:46 PM


Ok, I know I said I didn't like all the "work" but I like suicide girls for the most part....
and nakkidnerds too

gnojek
Inactive Member


Message 291 of 304 (221994)
07-05-2005 7:32 PM
Reply to: Message 289 by nator
07-05-2005 7:05 PM


Re: Ted Bundy
Watching them have sex is what does it.
If it's just nude picture or something, that's a different story.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 289 by nator, posted 07-05-2005 7:05 PM nator has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 293 by nator, posted 07-05-2005 7:36 PM gnojek has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024