Comments on EvC Forum: A Play

Ha! This is terrific, Robin! Are we allowed to join in? Hope I'm not interfering with any future "episodes" here but I've always wanted to do this...-----------------------------------------------------------------Debating continues unabated until a sudden hush falls over the group. A supreme, euphoric presence can be felt approaching as the door swings open and in walks Almighty God Himself... aka Brad McFall. He advances to the bar and pulls up a stool as the bartender comes over to take his order.Bartender: "What'll it be, mate?"Brad: "Hmm... Well, being as typically emanated dispositions relay such things - as mere desires and not NECESSITIES - sufficed shall such be as is that the (selected) preference based on and deriving from specific multitudes of qualities such balanced equilibrium herein exhibits ~REQUIRED~ sustenance, while NOT applied Feynman's electrodynamic model still owing to LESS MACROTHERMODYNAMICALLY SPECIFIC stylization as Gould may have yet been argued...but such *rarely* (detracted) from ^NEEDS^ in social conditions, or rather, by deduction OF LOGICALLY SEQUENCED CONSTRUCTS, and deflecting any PRACTICAL consequence of either the Wolfram or Mandelbrot "schools of thought" despite some arguing other specified qualities (though I doubt that Gladyshev nor Schneider would agree...thus would {more likely} RESULT, both as ^is^ and as ^would be^, of such structures which proceed both on and after non-sequential {and in cases of legitimacy [though *RARITY*] sequential} structures). Still, as would by all necessitated observation be that which APPEARS to current interlocutors, at least those (though clearly a redundant superfluity) IN PRESENT COMPANY - while parenthetically maintaining both possibility and probability of all abstract systems divisible within that relating to YET NOT DEPENDENT ON floating-point operations and recognizing conceivability of the internally external vs. the externally internal (Humphreys' model notwithstanding of course) - the "NEEDING" of certain reversal ~*either partial or absolute*~ within such self-referential assemblages ~REAL OR ARTIFICIAL~ may facilitate SANCTIONING...to what *ultimate* end isn't known of course or even any ACTUAL BEING as perhaps Kant INITIALLY suspected...but through expression of nothing IMMEDIATE in disagreeability could conceivably subsist in *~temporary~* juxtaposition which MAY lead away depending on corollary happenings but be parsimoniously redirected amid respective catalyzing methodologies intervening to realize synchronicity between Cantor and Penrose, whereby interactive phenomena reign unremittingly presenting perhaps an *"END"*...at least BY SOME *^RELATIVELY^* CURRENT, *INTER-RELATEDLY ("~^SOCIAL^~")* DEFINITIONS of the word."Bartender: *stares blankly*Brad: *reaches into his pocket and slaps a twenty down on the bar*Bartender: *grabs the twenty* "Yes, Sir!"The bartender goes off to get Brad (and himself) a drink, while the rest of the group sits quietly staring at Brad. Finally, the silence is broken...Rrhain: *blink* "You did not just say that, did you?"-----------------------------------------------------------------If you're reading this, Brad, no offense intended... meant in good humour and all that. You know we love ya!And, Robin, my apologies if I stepped on any script plans there but I've wanted to do that for ages.Great work, by the way. I've been enjoying the thread.