Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,914 Year: 4,171/9,624 Month: 1,042/974 Week: 1/368 Day: 1/11 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Far left - US/UK definition
arachnophilia
Member (Idle past 1374 days)
Posts: 9069
From: god's waiting room
Joined: 05-21-2004


Message 24 of 305 (225716)
07-23-2005 3:03 PM
Reply to: Message 23 by CanadianSteve
07-23-2005 3:01 PM


communism and socialism
But the left wants it through regulation and law, through government ownership in the economy, thriough international regulation, adn so on. At its extreme, Communism is the ultimate cooperative.
you mean "socialism." communism is like socialism, without the regulation and law.
The right believes in the cooperative through moral and ethical behaviour and responsibility, through charity.
"communism."
This message has been edited by arachnophilia, 07-23-2005 03:04 PM

אָרַח

This message is a reply to:
 Message 23 by CanadianSteve, posted 07-23-2005 3:01 PM CanadianSteve has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 28 by CanadianSteve, posted 07-23-2005 3:14 PM arachnophilia has replied

arachnophilia
Member (Idle past 1374 days)
Posts: 9069
From: god's waiting room
Joined: 05-21-2004


Message 32 of 305 (225725)
07-23-2005 3:16 PM
Reply to: Message 26 by CanadianSteve
07-23-2005 3:08 PM


economics
The right believes in private enterprise, both for pragmatic reasons - it creates the most wealth
yes, and no. it creates the most wealth to a certain point, but free and private enterprise is one of those systems that inherently fails. it encourages mergers and buyouts and monopolies, which actually hamper the system itself, not to mention the economic output.
The left is very suspicious of free enterprise, is quick to see large corporations as not a collection of millions of shareholders, but as an ugly, if necessary, behemoth that must be rigidly controlled by government.
while the anti-corporatists (aka environmentalists) tend to be a litte nuts, the point is somewhat true. we do need some checks.
the trick is to find a healthy balance.
Of course, all power muct be checked - which is a key aspect of the American constitution. But whereas the right is suspicious of government power - because it creates an inverse of loss of power for the individual, the left relies on government power to feel empowered on an individual basis.
this is why i've come to describe myself as a moderate. i'm suspicious of government -- but my ideas are usually liberal. i want less government power, a conservative position, but i also want better social programs. which i'm not totally sure you can even have together.

אָרַח

This message is a reply to:
 Message 26 by CanadianSteve, posted 07-23-2005 3:08 PM CanadianSteve has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 69 by CanadianSteve, posted 07-23-2005 8:03 PM arachnophilia has not replied

arachnophilia
Member (Idle past 1374 days)
Posts: 9069
From: god's waiting room
Joined: 05-21-2004


Message 40 of 305 (225761)
07-23-2005 5:15 PM
Reply to: Message 39 by Faith
07-23-2005 5:07 PM


Re: Ted Turner, leftist
The Guardian is identified as a leftist newspaper by Fox News.
do i need to even make an argument here?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 39 by Faith, posted 07-23-2005 5:07 PM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 42 by Faith, posted 07-23-2005 5:42 PM arachnophilia has replied

arachnophilia
Member (Idle past 1374 days)
Posts: 9069
From: god's waiting room
Joined: 05-21-2004


Message 43 of 305 (225769)
07-23-2005 5:55 PM
Reply to: Message 42 by Faith
07-23-2005 5:42 PM


left of us.
The idea is to illuminate the criteria by which the positions are determined, not chortle smugly away at predictable viewpoints.
but fox is so easy to chortle away smugly at.
What is it about the Guardian that Fox identifies as leftist?
let's reverse the question. what is it about fox that makes it identify everything else as leftist? if everything is left of something, what might we infer logically about its position?
And why according to bobbins' point of view, or your own, is it not all that leftist and what might be an example of something farther left?
i'm not sure how exactly far left the gaurdian is, because i don't read it. they strike me as a moderate, though, somewhere in the middle. but let's look at some of the stuff that's actually pretty far left and easily identifiable.
would we agree that this is a good deal further left?
unlike most of the right, i've been to my share of protests and rallies. i've met and talked to rabid environmentalist hippies who smell. i've seen the rags that get passed around, and read a few of them. there's a lot further on the left end of the spectrum. but the radical right has only one view: left of us. and nearly everyone is. it's almost elitists, actually.
for instance, you called the supreme court leftist. the supreme court had (and likely will continue to have) 5 conservatives and 4 liberals, and it's likely to continue it's surrent mode of judicial restraint -- which is conservative. it might be "left of you" but it's not "left." it's still over the line that divides right and left.

אָרַח

This message is a reply to:
 Message 42 by Faith, posted 07-23-2005 5:42 PM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 48 by Faith, posted 07-23-2005 6:26 PM arachnophilia has replied

arachnophilia
Member (Idle past 1374 days)
Posts: 9069
From: god's waiting room
Joined: 05-21-2004


Message 54 of 305 (225782)
07-23-2005 6:57 PM
Reply to: Message 48 by Faith
07-23-2005 6:26 PM


Re: left of us.
Obviously you and others here just don't care at all about determining the criteria for the positions on the right, you just want to ridicule them. That's the main problem with this thread. From your point of view the right has no basis for any of its judgments. End of subject.
hey! no! excuse me.
i showed you something on the far left. see the thread title? the idea is that we are going to try to establish the range of the mainstream philosophies, and the find the middle ground between the two.

אָרַח

This message is a reply to:
 Message 48 by Faith, posted 07-23-2005 6:26 PM Faith has not replied

arachnophilia
Member (Idle past 1374 days)
Posts: 9069
From: god's waiting room
Joined: 05-21-2004


Message 57 of 305 (225785)
07-23-2005 7:05 PM
Reply to: Message 55 by mick
07-23-2005 7:00 PM


facts
Where's the bias, faith? ... it's a statement of fact.
facts are leftist.

אָרַח

This message is a reply to:
 Message 55 by mick, posted 07-23-2005 7:00 PM mick has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 60 by mick, posted 07-23-2005 7:36 PM arachnophilia has replied
 Message 222 by Faith, posted 07-25-2005 5:28 AM arachnophilia has replied

arachnophilia
Member (Idle past 1374 days)
Posts: 9069
From: god's waiting room
Joined: 05-21-2004


Message 64 of 305 (225792)
07-23-2005 7:56 PM
Reply to: Message 60 by mick
07-23-2005 7:36 PM


Re: facts are leftist: tabloid versus broadsheet, US versus UK
arachnophilia, I think you have hit the nail on the head.
sadly, i think you have.
This message has been edited by arachnophilia, 07-23-2005 07:56 PM

אָרַח

This message is a reply to:
 Message 60 by mick, posted 07-23-2005 7:36 PM mick has not replied

arachnophilia
Member (Idle past 1374 days)
Posts: 9069
From: god's waiting room
Joined: 05-21-2004


Message 71 of 305 (225800)
07-23-2005 8:06 PM
Reply to: Message 65 by ringo
07-23-2005 7:58 PM


labels
My point is that we (in Canada) don't use left/right labels as "organizing principles". The only "organizing principles" that we use, as a rule, are specific policies on specific issues.
we have a label fetish here in the us. we like to label and clearly define people in pre-defined terms, view points, diseases, etc. we then basically stick to those labels faithfully. a "right" person always votes "right."
i don't know why this is.

אָרַח

This message is a reply to:
 Message 65 by ringo, posted 07-23-2005 7:58 PM ringo has not replied

arachnophilia
Member (Idle past 1374 days)
Posts: 9069
From: god's waiting room
Joined: 05-21-2004


Message 73 of 305 (225802)
07-23-2005 8:07 PM
Reply to: Message 62 by CanadianSteve
07-23-2005 7:49 PM


re: crashfrog
I think you're a closet conservative.
lmao.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 62 by CanadianSteve, posted 07-23-2005 7:49 PM CanadianSteve has not replied

arachnophilia
Member (Idle past 1374 days)
Posts: 9069
From: god's waiting room
Joined: 05-21-2004


Message 75 of 305 (225804)
07-23-2005 8:14 PM
Reply to: Message 28 by CanadianSteve
07-23-2005 3:14 PM


Re: communism and socialism
Socialism and Communism are related, in that they both have goverment ownership of teh economy.
no, that's socialism. communism has no government ownership of anything, because there is no government. many governments have called themselves communist, but none were. because none can be.

אָרַח

This message is a reply to:
 Message 28 by CanadianSteve, posted 07-23-2005 3:14 PM CanadianSteve has not replied

arachnophilia
Member (Idle past 1374 days)
Posts: 9069
From: god's waiting room
Joined: 05-21-2004


Message 141 of 305 (225892)
07-24-2005 3:17 AM
Reply to: Message 16 by CanadianSteve
07-23-2005 2:35 PM


Re: Left & right
Roe vs. Wade can also be seen as state rights vs. federal interference
i didn't notice this at first.
anyways, we have this thing called the fourteenth amendment that says basically that "No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States;"
meaning that roe v. wade is not and cannot be a state vs federal claim over rights. roe v. wade says that the government -- including state governments -- does not have the right to intrude on a woman's internal anatomy, barring a strongly compelling state interest. the "compelling" nature of that interest in the preservation of life, they ruled, increases as the term goes on.
-- but it's not a federalist/confederalist debate.

אָרַח

This message is a reply to:
 Message 16 by CanadianSteve, posted 07-23-2005 2:35 PM CanadianSteve has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 146 by Faith, posted 07-24-2005 4:21 AM arachnophilia has replied
 Message 162 by CanadianSteve, posted 07-24-2005 10:36 AM arachnophilia has replied

arachnophilia
Member (Idle past 1374 days)
Posts: 9069
From: god's waiting room
Joined: 05-21-2004


Message 142 of 305 (225894)
07-24-2005 3:21 AM
Reply to: Message 139 by Faith
07-24-2005 2:35 AM


care to document that?
it's based on such things as anti-Iraq war
show me something from cnn that's anti-iraq. and reporting accurate facts does not count. i shouldn't have to explain why.
anti-American stance
show me something from cnn that's anti-american.
just keep throwign around these extremely biased assertions. wanna know something? i don;t trust cnn that much either. ... because i think they're right-biased.

אָרַח

This message is a reply to:
 Message 139 by Faith, posted 07-24-2005 2:35 AM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 148 by Faith, posted 07-24-2005 4:36 AM arachnophilia has replied

arachnophilia
Member (Idle past 1374 days)
Posts: 9069
From: god's waiting room
Joined: 05-21-2004


Message 144 of 305 (225900)
07-24-2005 4:08 AM
Reply to: Message 111 by mick
07-23-2005 10:31 PM


left qualities
You say that, in the US, liberalism is equivalent to leftism and that liberalism is characterised by the following:
multiculturalim
anti-Americanism (the accusation of imperialism)
militant feminism
gay rights
abortion rights
i'm gonna go out on a limb here and agree with faith. this is a rare occasion, just so you know.
like i said, in america we assign labels. and in america, we don't judge policies by what they are but by who says them -- so there's "stuff the liberals say" and "stuff the conservatives say." not "a liberal idea" or "a conservative idea." in america, left = liberal and right = conservative. it's just the words we use really, and doesn't actually have the distinctive house of commons/house of lords seating arrangement in mind (although i do think the democracts do sit on the left, and the republicans sit on the right. anyone know for sure? i forget my history of seating charts at the moment)
anyhow, the typical extremist liberal (citizen, not politician) is for:
multiculturalim
anti-imperialism
militant feminism
gay rights
pro-choice.
now, the important distinction here is that anti-imperialism is NOT anti-american. a good many foundign fathers were isolationists. since faith never answered my t/f question, i'll spoil the answer. false. the us did not aid in the french revolution in return for french aid in the american. they thought it was not the business of our new country to get involved in the affairs of other. this was the philosophy of the first few sitting presidents. they had just ESCAPED an imperial power -- england -- that was most certainly anti-american.
to say that this position is anti-american is to literally call george washington himself anti-american.

אָרַח

This message is a reply to:
 Message 111 by mick, posted 07-23-2005 10:31 PM mick has not replied

arachnophilia
Member (Idle past 1374 days)
Posts: 9069
From: god's waiting room
Joined: 05-21-2004


Message 147 of 305 (225904)
07-24-2005 4:27 AM
Reply to: Message 146 by Faith
07-24-2005 4:21 AM


Re: Left & right
The fourteenth amendment should be repealed. It was a terrible abrogation of the spirit of the Constitution.
write to your congressman.
there are things that the constitution specifically proscribes the federal government from doing, and reserves for states rights. the 14th ammendment means that the bill of rights does not just apply to federal gov't.
without it, we could concievably have a state law that limits political speech, and it would be ok. just as long as the federal government doesn't do it. but we are federalist nation, and not a confederation of independent states.
do you REALLY want the 14th amendment repealed?
This message has been edited by arachnophilia, 07-24-2005 04:27 AM

אָרַח

This message is a reply to:
 Message 146 by Faith, posted 07-24-2005 4:21 AM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 149 by Faith, posted 07-24-2005 4:48 AM arachnophilia has replied

arachnophilia
Member (Idle past 1374 days)
Posts: 9069
From: god's waiting room
Joined: 05-21-2004


Message 168 of 305 (225945)
07-24-2005 1:04 PM
Reply to: Message 148 by Faith
07-24-2005 4:36 AM


Re: care to document that?
Keep your ears peeled. The problem is that leftists don't hear the leftist spin, just treat it as fact because it is shared by them and they are not exposed to the other point of view without its being ridiculed or denigrated one way or another.
and the same can be said for the right too.
I don't get CNN any more so all I can give is a general impression
mmhmm.

אָרַח

This message is a reply to:
 Message 148 by Faith, posted 07-24-2005 4:36 AM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 170 by Faith, posted 07-24-2005 1:13 PM arachnophilia has replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024