it's usually offered in response to a believer who says "I can't imagine/it's not possible to not believe in God."
I agree with you with the way you phrased it but the core question from the OP seems different than what you are talking about.
OP writes:
What
reason do you have to believe that people with as much, if not more, spiritual evidence in the existence of their Gods are some how wrong?
The hidden implication in that question is that we are talking about hypocrisy.
In that case it's highly appropriate to point out, in reply, all of the various and sundry Gods that the speaker already doesn't believe in.
But they don't have disbelief in those Gods for the same reasons. ("I can't imagine/its not possible to not believe in God")
They have disbelief in those Gods because they believe that their particular holy book instructs them to have this disbelief.
This is why the argument fails with fundamentalists. They don't necessarily reject other deities on their base absurdity. They reject them because THEIR God says to.
Of course, biblical creationists are committed to belief in God's written Word, the Bible, which forbids bearing false witness; --AIG (lest they forget)