Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
6 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,898 Year: 4,155/9,624 Month: 1,026/974 Week: 353/286 Day: 9/65 Hour: 0/3


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Pseudoskepticism and logic
Bailey
Member (Idle past 4398 days)
Posts: 574
From: Earth
Joined: 08-24-2003


Message 176 of 562 (526366)
09-26-2009 9:59 PM
Reply to: Message 174 by RAZD
09-26-2009 8:57 PM


Re: I'm missing something...I think
Hi fellas - hope things are well ...
RAZ writes:
oni writes:
Can you define/describe/explain what you mean by "god"? I need to know what you're talking about before I can follow the rest of your claims.
But the point of this thread is that people assert they are atheists without having to know my definition - why and how is that?
Why - sensations of bitterness, hope, prejudice, resentment, etc. ?
Perhaps these emotions may transfer to the converse position(s) as well at times ...
How - pure ignorance and naivety.
Perhaps this dynamic transfers to the converse position(s) as well.
Then again, I may have had too many tacos this evening ...
Or do we find that the logical conclusion is agnostic?
It seems that oni is suggesting that, without the basic premise as to what defines an individual's perception of a god, the logical conclusion is unknowable whether theistic, agnostic or atheistic, etc.. For instance, perhaps - may one claim their car is red, without first laying out the premise of what color defines?
In this light, there is the sense that - without at least a general concept of what a particular god may be, a god maybe nothing, everything and anything.
With this definition - god is nothing, everything and anything, can one find a logical conclusion in agnosticism?
Again, I'm not sure, as I am really into my tacos this evening (chalupas actually) ...
One Love
Edited by Bailey, : pnct.

I'm not here to mock or condemn what you believe, tho my intentions are no less than to tickle your thinker.
If those in first century CE had known what these words mean ... 'I want and desire mercy, not sacrifice'
They surely would not have murdered the innocent; why trust what I say, when you can learn for yourself?
Think for yourself.
Mercy Trumps Judgement,
Love Weary

This message is a reply to:
 Message 174 by RAZD, posted 09-26-2009 8:57 PM RAZD has seen this message but not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 183 by onifre, posted 09-27-2009 1:42 AM Bailey has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024