Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,902 Year: 4,159/9,624 Month: 1,030/974 Week: 357/286 Day: 13/65 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Does complexity require intelligent design?
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 18 of 229 (191483)
03-14-2005 2:48 PM
Reply to: Message 9 by tsig
03-13-2005 7:38 PM


For every complicated question there is a really simple answer, that answer is always wrong.
joy!
Complicated question: Where did all the information in DNA come from?
Simple answer: Randomly.

The immeasurable present is forever consuming the eternal future and extending the infinite past. buzsaw

This message is a reply to:
 Message 9 by tsig, posted 03-13-2005 7:38 PM tsig has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 19 by kjsimons, posted 03-14-2005 2:56 PM Buzsaw has not replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 23 of 229 (191549)
03-14-2005 7:53 PM
Reply to: Message 22 by Parasomnium
03-14-2005 5:47 PM


Re: Selection, selection, SELECTION!!!
On top of that, it isn't even grammatically correct.
If you're refering to "randomly," fyi, it's a grammatically correct adverb.
But, putting that aside - if I may elaborate a bit on your reply, KJ - what this tells us is that Buzsaw thinks that the question he poses is complicated. But it isn't. It's really a very simple question.
The subject of the question is indeed complicated.
that the answer evolutionists give to this question is that the information is the result of a purely random process;
The factual and correct answer remains that the process would not alegedly happen without random mutation.
Lastly, Buzsaw is even wrong in thinking the answer is wrong.
Tell it to Kisimons. It was Kisimons who said simple answers to complicated questions are always wrong.

The immeasurable present is forever consuming the eternal future and extending the infinite past. buzsaw

This message is a reply to:
 Message 22 by Parasomnium, posted 03-14-2005 5:47 PM Parasomnium has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 24 by crashfrog, posted 03-14-2005 10:44 PM Buzsaw has replied
 Message 29 by Parasomnium, posted 03-15-2005 3:31 AM Buzsaw has replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 26 of 229 (191576)
03-14-2005 11:22 PM
Reply to: Message 24 by crashfrog
03-14-2005 10:44 PM


Re: Adverbs
He's nitpicking you, Buz, which I personally would never support, but he is correct. An adverb is never the gramatically correct answer to a "where" question. It would, however, be gramatically correct if you had asked "How does the information etc...
Since the question was ambiguous and vague in suggesting that DNA came from a location, the adverb, imo, was grammatically appropriate, implying "It came randomly."
Hopefully we can soon nitpic our way back to the topic.

The immeasurable present is forever consuming the eternal future and extending the infinite past. buzsaw

This message is a reply to:
 Message 24 by crashfrog, posted 03-14-2005 10:44 PM crashfrog has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 27 by crashfrog, posted 03-15-2005 12:28 AM Buzsaw has not replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 31 of 229 (191840)
03-15-2005 11:18 PM
Reply to: Message 29 by Parasomnium
03-15-2005 3:31 AM


Re: Selection, selection, SELECTION!!!
Fyi, I've long been aware about NS. Either however, imo, would be correct.

The immeasurable present is forever consuming the eternal future and extending the infinite past. buzsaw

This message is a reply to:
 Message 29 by Parasomnium, posted 03-15-2005 3:31 AM Parasomnium has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 32 by Parasomnium, posted 03-16-2005 3:42 AM Buzsaw has replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 39 of 229 (192022)
03-16-2005 10:59 PM
Reply to: Message 32 by Parasomnium
03-16-2005 3:42 AM


Re: Selection, selection, SELECTION!!!
Both are necessay for information to build up.
.......And a whole lota other stuff had to happen which neither of us mentioned, like there had to be light and heat energy, et al. I simply mentioned one. Why not get over nitpicking?

The immeasurable present is forever consuming the eternal future and extending the infinite past. buzsaw

This message is a reply to:
 Message 32 by Parasomnium, posted 03-16-2005 3:42 AM Parasomnium has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 43 by nator, posted 03-17-2005 2:24 AM Buzsaw has not replied
 Message 49 by Parasomnium, posted 03-17-2005 3:23 AM Buzsaw has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024