Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,902 Year: 4,159/9,624 Month: 1,030/974 Week: 357/286 Day: 0/13 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Foundations of ID
cmanteuf
Member (Idle past 6795 days)
Posts: 92
From: Virginia, USA
Joined: 11-08-2004


Message 138 of 213 (206539)
05-09-2005 4:25 PM
Reply to: Message 128 by coffee_addict
05-08-2005 11:03 PM


Troy writes:
Jar, the problem with your argument is that designers rarely ever mak e something the same over and over.
"Good programmers know how to code. Great programmers know when to reuse."
And yes, this particular argument is no more than an argument from incredulity... but it's exactly the same as the ID/YEC argument, only using correct facts (as opposed to something like 'bats wings are like bird wings so therefore The Designer must have reused them').
Chris

This message is a reply to:
 Message 128 by coffee_addict, posted 05-08-2005 11:03 PM coffee_addict has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 139 by jar, posted 05-09-2005 5:05 PM cmanteuf has not replied
 Message 140 by coffee_addict, posted 05-09-2005 5:16 PM cmanteuf has replied

  
cmanteuf
Member (Idle past 6795 days)
Posts: 92
From: Virginia, USA
Joined: 11-08-2004


Message 147 of 213 (206731)
05-10-2005 10:20 AM
Reply to: Message 140 by coffee_addict
05-09-2005 5:16 PM


Troy writes:
When I am pressed for time, I do reuse a lot of stuff.
Welcome to the world of the professional engineer.
(And I can say that because I've been in the workplace for almost a year now!)
Troy writes:
It is hardly fair if you and others use this line of thought agaist IDists everytime the subject is brought up.
In message
http://EvC Forum: Foundations of ID -->EvC Forum: Foundations of ID
Jerry Don Bauer said:
Jerry Don Bauer writes:
Why come up with a helicopter design for bats when the wings I designed for birds do the job perfectly well?
The part of the previous message that Mr. Bauer was responding to was about Hox genes, so it would appear that in this particular case the IDist brought up the bat wing-bird wing comparison, not the so-called Darwinists.
I think it is legitimate to make the exact same argument, only with correct facts, right back. It isn't a strong argument, because it is nothing more than an appeal to incredulity. I would think, however, that it would be convincing to the IDist, since he made the argument originally himself, just with incorrect facts. And being convincing and being on a sound logical basis are often orthogonal, c.f. politics.
Chris

This message is a reply to:
 Message 140 by coffee_addict, posted 05-09-2005 5:16 PM coffee_addict has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 150 by Jerry Don Bauer, posted 05-10-2005 7:45 PM cmanteuf has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024