Now when we can understand biogenesis as opposed to abiogenesis one can clearly see that abiogenesis gives us no answers, while biogenesis clearly does. The Bible also clues us into the undeniable fact of biogenesis. Genesis 1:12 - And the earth brought forth grass, and herb yielding seed after his kind, and the tree yielding fruit, whose seed was in itself, after his kind: and G-d saw that it was good.
The problem is that your method is still abiogenesis. You start with bare earth & poof, grass. That is even more absurd than the abiogenesis hypothesized by biologists. Yours starts with nothing, at least the bios version starts with something, Carbon Dioxide, Methane, Ammonia, Hydrogen & Water. Yours with Iron-alumno silicates (earth) which in no way can become grass.
Edited by bluescat48, : typo
There is no better love between 2 people than mutual respect for each other WT Young, 2002
Who gave anyone the authority to call me an authority on anything. WT Young, 1969
Since Evolution is only ~90% correct it should be thrown out and replaced by Creation which has even a lower % of correctness. W T Young, 2008