quote:
So you expected me to 'prove' something? I'm sorry, but I have no such intentions. My intent was to introduce the topic to this community and have a discussion about it. I have introduced the topic, but unfortunately the people here are stupid enough to deviate and start asking me for something else.
Really? First you make a dubious argument that there can't be evidence then when it becomes clear that evidence is needed you claim that you have it and then when asked to produce it you decline to do so.
That seems to be a very odd way to hold a discussion and if it has wandered it seems to be largely your fault for chopping and changing.
quote:
For example, PaulK's tantrums about me not producing the evidence that supports God's ultimate authority (and not just me but ALL christians).
Oh ? It's stupid to ask you for evidence you claim to have ? And "throwing a tantrum" ? I think such a phrase better describes your post here.
So if we might sum up, your OP was wrong in that it IS wise to seek evidence before accepting any source as an "ultimate authority" - and you don't have that evidence.