God's Place In Evolution

First time I ever hear this, any evidence for it ?

I'll just point off that this is pretty falacious reasoning. It is analog to someone saying, after hearing another person say ''oxygen is fundamental to human life'', ''well I don't believe in oxygen and I live just fine''.

Okok, well I not too well versed in that subject, but I have to say that this all seems to be more of an hypothesis then an established fact., which seems to be intricately connected to the documentary hypothesis.Which, in my humble opinion, seems to be an outdated hypothesis for the authorship of the Pentateuch. But that's probably another subject

This all has nothing to do with the fact that the reasoning is a fallacy or not. It is confounding belief in something with the actual thing. Just because something is essential to life, does not mean belief in said thing is also essential.Even with all the scientific experiments in the world, someone may not believe in oxygen. It does not make it any less essential for that person.Idem for the God issue. If goldrush says ''God is essential for human existence'', even if this is unfounded, replying ''I don't believe in God and I exist just fine'' is clearly a fallacious rebuttal.

I think you are seeing way more into this then what the texts indicate.If I remember correctly supposedly the creation account is made in a known jewish litterary style, where it at first looks at the general aspect of creation, then 'zooms in' on the creation of man. (yes, I know this is an unfounded assertion)

I think there an easy way to test if the writing of Gen1 and Gen2-3 is seperated by time. There should be a notable language/syntax differences between the two.AbE I you want to continue on this issue, start a new thread.Edited by slevesque, : No reason given.