I would of course argue that you were intellectually deceived.
No Phat. You have never argued, never presented evidence or rational argument to support your position; you do not argue and have never even shown that you know what it even means.
I point out the FACT that the members of every other religion know that their position is correct and that you are wrong and so they demonstrate that your position has no more validity than their position. All are simply unsupported assertions including your assertion.
To argue against that fact you need to present evidence or reasoned argumentation to support the validity of your position.
You do not even sell any sizzle much less a steak.
You are claiming infallibility using this method, even though the method itself is not infallible.
That is simply not true Phat and if you had any respect for honesty you would acknowledge that fact.
I have never claimed infallibility.
The whole basis of the Scientific Method is an acknowledgement of fallibility; that EVERYTHING is subject to independent verification and conclusions must always be held tentatively and be subject to revision if new and additional evidence contradicts those conclusions.
You like all of the rest of the CCoI simply willfully misrepresent the meaning of words and the positions that are presented to you from outside the CCoI.
Again, the mistake you make is assuming that no God exists.
And for a second time in the same post you once again lie!
You get close and then ruin it by saying something truly stupid like "I wont disagree, because for one thing I feel the Holy Spirit in that quote."
You do not feel the Holy Spirit in that quote an if you had any respect for the truth you would admit you have never even been able to explain what the hell the Holy Spirit is or how you could "feel" it or taste it or test it.