What do the victims have to do with it?

So you have no research to back up your statement?We are supposed to accept all aphorisms as proven facts?ABeYou did say there was emerging research. Was that a lie?Edited by Theodoric, : No reason given.

Correct, but not sure why Chuckie is jumping all over a call for evidence.

It is not our responsibility to search for evidence to refute claims. It is the responsibility of the person presenting the claim to provide the evidence.If you had any skills at debating you would provide evidence to support a claim.Throwing out unsupported claims then demanding someone provide the evidence to refute it is a a lazy cop out. We are talking about when there is no evidence.In the words of Christopher Hitchens.

quote:

---

that what can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence.

---

SourceYou see how I did not just assert that this was an actual Hitchens quote? I actually provide the source so that you and everyone else can read it in context.

Let me get this straight.Poster 1
Posts assertions with no evidence.
Therefore, excellent debater.Poster 2
Asks for evidence for the assertion.
Therefore, lazy.Sounds like Bizarro World to me.So in your crazy world it is incumbent upon people to show an unevidenced assertion is false before the asserter has to show any evidence at all for the assertion?