Conservapedia declares victory over EvC Forum

A large portion of which are times when you earned suspensions, and upon the end of the suspensions, returned and deliberately acted out and justly received an even longer suspension. You are no longer suspended from from the biology forums. Percy reinstated after your last tirade. I think he rewarded you for throwing a fit in the 'Throw a fit' forum. You might remember the thread in which I demonstrated that you were not telling the truth about the reason for your suspension from the biology forums.I note that you have yet to make any posts in the biological forums even though you have had posting permissions for nearly two months.I'll also note that the list does not include non-Creationists who are indefinitely suspended from all forums on the board. So yeah, there may be some unaccounted for suspensions in the list.Edited by NoNukes, : No reason given.

From what I have seen, they evidently skipped over that one.

Ray was an absolute hoot. Evolution (which his soon to be published essay would demolish) was God's punishment for believing in er, evolution.He would practically froth at the mouth.

What was his screen name?

Lots.Willowtree, Cold Foreign Object, Herepton and others I've forgotten.

Here ya go: Cold Foreign Object

You have to concentrate on your strong points instead of foolishly denying the weak ones. They beat you lot on the obvious intelligence of the supposedly designed which you have to deny in order to be consistent with all of it coming from the nothing of the Big Bunk.
They can afford to assume the same hilarious bigbangist premises since they are covered there having their something instead of your nothing in the shape of their putative designer. So they beat you on the conservation laws, entropy, memory, information, etc. which you deny against all logic and evidence.Therefore, you have to shift the debate towards moral grounds where you lot have indisputable advantage over the ID theorists.Given the reality of the intricate death avoiding machines forever at cross purposes with one another, i.e., the machines having no other chance to obtain the fuel apart from devouring each other, the only possible designer of such a system could be a clever Devil creating life for personal entertainment, experimentation and amusement. Not all-powerful and benevolent God.That's just a rough outline from the feline. But you catch the drift.

In next week's episode of How To Be An Idiot, Maddenstein will explain to us how to make yourself invisible by using ordinary household supplies such as lemon juice.

This feline does not catch your drift. You are talking bollocks. None of what you say makes any logical sense.

Hi Alfred,As I requested in another thread where you recently attempted to begin participation, because people are having so much trouble making sense of your posts I'd like you to restrict your participation to just a few threads. Please stop participating in this thread. Thanks.

Well, I can't find where I could log in to their site. Most sites are begging for me to log into their site, but I really can't find where Conservapedia will even let me do so.Meanwhile Conservapedia's main page of what pretends to be an encyclopeda still says: And: And: And: And: And: And: Now, I haven't even quoted all the examples of them being on their main page liars and fools. And if I wanted to talk about them being liars and fools about things not on their main page, I'd die before I got through it all. Those are merely the examples of things they currently say on what is supposed to be an encyclopedia of articles which are still suggesting that the Republicans might win the Presidential election which are still on their main page on November 19th, 2012.I'd just like to suggest that maybe those articles don't belong on their main page anymore.Edited by Dr Adequate, : No reason given.

Invitation only, of course.

I find this "resorts to early voting" comment highly amusing. It's as if early voting were some kind of nefarious plot. I also note that on Conservapedia's Presidential Election 2012 article, conservapedia pushes the same claim.

quote:

---

By relying on extensive early voting driven by the Democrat political machine -- which totaled more than 40% of the vote -- Barack Obama defeated Mitt Romney despite losing nearly 10 million votes from 2008.

---

I suppose that this is less stupid than the excuses made by a lot of pundits (52 per cent of the electorate is lazy, wants stuff, and or are women who won't listen to a man), and less stupid than the excuses Romney himself has offered (Obama bought their votes), but then, that is a very low standard for facing reality. Edited by NoNukes, : No reason given.

Top right corner, main page.Also on the main page right now: Edited by rbp, : No reason given.

If you read the Question Evolution blog that is discussed here you get the idea that atheism will die any minute and that their campaign is one giant victory march. I find it therefore very refreshing to get some insight into how they actually conduct that campaign on the ground... source