Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,886 Year: 4,143/9,624 Month: 1,014/974 Week: 341/286 Day: 62/40 Hour: 3/4


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Big Bang...How Did it Happen?
Primordial Egg
Inactive Member


Message 176 of 414 (103828)
04-29-2004 4:33 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by Navy10E
03-13-2004 3:01 AM


Excellent article
Navy10E writes:
I simply want to know everyone's theory on the "Big Bang", how it happened, could it happen, etc. Start it out basicly.
There's an interesting article written by Gabriele Veneziano about string and pre-bang theory in the latest edition of Scientific American which does away with the notion that time started at the Big Bang. Actually, it does away with the Big Bang singularity (aka the "speck") altogether.
Link.
Excerpts:
Gabriele Veneziano writes:
The first, known as the pre-big bang scenario, which my colleagues and I began to develop in 1991, combines T-duality with the better-known symmetry of time reversal, whereby the equations of physics work equally well when applied backward and forward in time. The combination gives rise to new possible cosmologies in which the universe, say, five seconds before the big bang expanded at the same pace as it did five seconds after the bang. But the rate of change of the expansion was opposite at the two instants: if it was decelerating after the bang, it was accelerating before. In short, the big bang may not have been the origin of the universe but simply a violent transition from acceleration to deceleration.
The beauty of this picture is that it automatically incorporates the great insight of standard inflationary theory--namely, that the universe had to undergo a period of acceleration to become so homogeneous and isotropic. In the standard theory, acceleration occurs after the big bang because of an ad hoc inflaton field. In the pre-big bang scenario, it occurs before the bang as a natural outcome of the novel symmetries of string theory
.
.
.
So, when did time begin? Science does not have a conclusive answer yet, but at least two potentially testable theories plausibly hold that the universe--and therefore time--existed well before the big bang. If either scenario is right, the cosmos has always been in existence and, even if it recollapses one day, will never end.
Far be it for me to question this, (I'm not even sure I understand it to be honest), but I do have a problem with the idea of a Universe being around forever. This would mean that anything allowable under physical laws which could happen has already happened (i.e. any event with a non zero probability of occurring in time t, has a probability of having occurred as 1 in an infinite Universe), and that seems absurd to me (especially if you couple this with the Quantum Many Worlds interpretation....infinity * infinity!!)
Still, interesting read...
PE

404 Not Found

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Navy10E, posted 03-13-2004 3:01 AM Navy10E has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 177 by Percy, posted 04-29-2004 5:26 PM Primordial Egg has not replied

Primordial Egg
Inactive Member


Message 331 of 414 (142590)
09-15-2004 6:12 PM
Reply to: Message 329 by General Nazort
09-15-2004 5:25 PM


Re: sdfd
General Nazort writes:
Some progress has been made in this area - for example, the Heisenberg uncertainty principle has been succesfully described with classical physics.
Can you expand on what you mean here please?
PE

This message is a reply to:
 Message 329 by General Nazort, posted 09-15-2004 5:25 PM General Nazort has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024