This is not true. When mutations happen, there is no new genetic infomationt that occurs. Its just the oppisite that happens, a loss of genetic infomation. So how can "evolution" take place if no new gentic infomation has occured... which is the basis for the hypothesis its self, is it not?
---"As Dr. Lee Spetner, a Jewish scientist and expert on mutations, has stated in his excellent book, Not by Chance: Shattering the Modern Theory of Evolution, pp. 159—60:
But all these mutations reduce the information in the gene by making a protein less specific. They add no information and they add no new molecular capability. Indeed, all mutations studied destroy information. None of them can serve as an example of a mutation that can lead to the large changes of macroevolution. ... Whoever thinks macroevolution can be made by mutations that lose information is like the merchant who lost a little money on every sale but thought he could make it up on volume."
™ Version 4.2