Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,901 Year: 4,158/9,624 Month: 1,029/974 Week: 356/286 Day: 12/65 Hour: 1/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Is creationism science?
Coragyps
Member (Idle past 763 days)
Posts: 5553
From: Snyder, Texas, USA
Joined: 11-12-2002


Message 15 of 114 (368075)
12-06-2006 8:51 PM
Reply to: Message 14 by Confidence
12-06-2006 8:31 PM


Re: Creationism bull
The biblical basis was that everything was made out of water.
Contrary to observation, though. The first baryonic matter was hydrogen, helium, and a speck of lithium. No oxygen. No water. No molecules at all, for that matter. Genesis is a collection of prescientific stories.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 14 by Confidence, posted 12-06-2006 8:31 PM Confidence has not replied

  
Coragyps
Member (Idle past 763 days)
Posts: 5553
From: Snyder, Texas, USA
Joined: 11-12-2002


Message 83 of 114 (392572)
04-01-2007 12:07 PM
Reply to: Message 80 by Reserve
04-01-2007 9:59 AM


Re: Science
Hi, Reserve! Welcome!
I believe that a believe in evolution started with the rejection of the written Word of God.
Where do you get that? Many of the "naturalists" of the early 1800's - the guys who came up with what we now know as geology, palaeontology, and biology - were Christian ministers. But they followed the evidence they found in rocks, fossils, and life, and realized that parts of their scriptures were metaphorical. Not false, not rejected, but metaphor. Like Jesus's parables are metaphorical.
We have yet to find more at the quantum level to see how this actually works. Currently we have no way to tell which atom will decay. As well, we do not know why the half life works the way it does. For instance, why does one atom decay very soon, and another will not decay for a billion years?
And we don't fully understand how the gravitational attraction of the Sun keeps the Earth in its orbit, or why the angular momentum of the Earth should keep it spinning like it does. Do these failures in understanding cause you to question calendar dating? Will you say, "The Norman conquest might not have been in 1066, because we don't know if gravitons exist or not?" I doubt that you would.....
However, there is current research being done to find out if radioactivity could have increased in the past (i.e. at creation, or during the flood.
Increased how many thousand-fold? If the rate of decay increases, the radiation and resulting heat increase in proportion. How much boiling will an ark of gopher wood withstand? Particularly if it's boiling rock?
And what evidence shows clearly that there was no global flood?
All of geology since about 1815.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 80 by Reserve, posted 04-01-2007 9:59 AM Reserve has not replied

  
Coragyps
Member (Idle past 763 days)
Posts: 5553
From: Snyder, Texas, USA
Joined: 11-12-2002


Message 109 of 114 (393893)
04-08-2007 9:32 AM
Reply to: Message 107 by b b
04-08-2007 4:38 AM


Science can "change" the word of God can't.
OT, I know, but brief: has "the word of God" remained unchanged over the last couple of centuries as it applies to slavery? To interracial marriage? To women wearing hats to church or being deacons or ministers?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 107 by b b, posted 04-08-2007 4:38 AM b b has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024