Does all Creation science claim that? Or only YEC.
Is there some kind of rule that says in order to be a Creation scientists you must be a a literal YEC?
You can be a YEC or Old Earth, doesn't much matter. Creation Science can never be scientific since it starts with a conclusion.
For example, consider Baraminology. It starts with the first assumption that any Kind mentioned in the Bible takes precedence over ANY and all conflicting evidence.
In accomplishing the goal of separating parts of polybaramins, partitioning apobaramins, building monobaramins and characterizing holobaramins, a taxonomist needs guidelines for deciding what belongs to a particular monobaraminic branch. These standards will vary depending upon the groups being considered, but general guidelines which have been utilized include:
1. Scripture claims (used in baraminology but not in discontinuity systematics).
This has priority over all other considerations. For example humans are a separate holobaramin because they separately were created (Genesis 1 and 2). However, even as explained by Wise in his 1990 oral presentation, there is not much relevant taxonomic information in the Bible. Also, ReMine’s discontinuity systematics, because it is a neutral scientific enterprise, does not include the Bible as a source of taxonomic information.
from
Frair, 2000.
It is even possible that the Creationists might be right, however it will NEVER be science.
Aslan is not a Tame Lion