Seems to me that a lot of scientists are into a game of saying that creationism is not science, and on that basis dismissing it as unworthy of their or anyone's attention. Now I was trained in science, and I do think that naturalistic processes do not explain all about the origins of life and of species. Nonetheless, I'm getting to where I'm willing to say, OK, creation(ism) is not science, if you want to define science that way. creation(ism) is beyond science. But the consequence / corollary to that would be: science does not and cannot explain everything in the natural world, especially the origins of life and species.
How does this sit, in general, with people who call themselves creationists? How does it sit with scientists?
Thanks
Juve
™ Version 4.2
