Does Science Truly Represent Reality?

No, theories that come from the imagination based on speculation have nothing to do with science.If the earth is 4.5 billions years old, then that means it sat around vacant for a much longer time than it's been inhabited. So why is that? Scientists ignore that question because the whole goal of secular scientists is to deny God. So their theories pose many more questions than answers.Apes and monkeys don't turn into humans in reality nor do they produce human descendants in reality either. So the theory of evolution is as ludicrous and imaginary as claiming that King Kong once ruled the world.And neither is finding bones in the dirt, rocks, or desert, and imagining what they can be science any more than a child finding bones in the dirt and exclaiming; "Mommy, this bone looks like an apeman!"And neither is looking at an iceberg and claiming that the whole world was once convered in ice, science any more than imagining that the earth was once covered in lava by looking at what volcanos can do to the earth around them.So no, scientific theories are just that; theories. And since a theory is an imaginary scenario that can't be proven, only a "what if" just like science fiction premises, then theories aren't science.Edited by Refpunk, : No reason given.Edited by Admin, : No reason given.