Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,901 Year: 4,158/9,624 Month: 1,029/974 Week: 356/286 Day: 12/65 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The lack of empirical evidence for the theory of evolution, according to Faith.
AdminNosy
Administrator
Posts: 4754
From: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Joined: 11-11-2003


Message 48 of 138 (197654)
04-08-2005 10:09 AM
Reply to: Message 43 by Faith
04-08-2005 9:15 AM


Following the Guidelines
As for the rest of your stupid self-serving post (do you guys know how to do anything else?):
I think it is time you reviewed the guidelines here. This comment is unnecessary and reflects badly on you.
If you think that people are making stupid statments the way to make that point is to point out, precisely and clearly the faults in them. Others may then make up their own mind about how "stupid" they are or not.
When you are unable to make clear the faults in others posts but only call them names it suggests that you don't in fact have any valid critism to make.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 43 by Faith, posted 04-08-2005 9:15 AM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 55 by Faith, posted 04-08-2005 4:18 PM AdminNosy has replied

  
AdminNosy
Administrator
Posts: 4754
From: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Joined: 11-11-2003


Message 57 of 138 (197711)
04-08-2005 4:26 PM
Reply to: Message 55 by Faith
04-08-2005 4:18 PM


The faults are?
I'm sure you don't care what I think but maybe some of those who don't post but do read posts might matter to you. If no ones opinion matters why bother to post at all?
If only those who agree with you already matter why bother to post at all?
Your response tends to sugggest again that you aren't able to articulate the so called faults. Generally I would think that you would understand the best way to point out someones "stupidity" is to show, in excuciating detail just how stupid something is.
Many here to that, over and over with some patience. You don't like having to deal with something the first time without talking about doing it over and over.
Ban you? LOL Why would someone do that when you offer up such great examples?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 55 by Faith, posted 04-08-2005 4:18 PM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 59 by Faith, posted 04-08-2005 4:33 PM AdminNosy has not replied

  
AdminNosy
Administrator
Posts: 4754
From: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Joined: 11-11-2003


Message 125 of 138 (198786)
04-12-2005 7:01 PM
Reply to: Message 124 by Silent H
04-12-2005 5:56 PM


Topic Title
Uh, Holmes, could you take a peek at topic titles and supply a new one that is indicative of where the conversation is now?
Thanks.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 124 by Silent H, posted 04-12-2005 5:56 PM Silent H has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024