Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
6 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,901 Year: 4,158/9,624 Month: 1,029/974 Week: 356/286 Day: 12/65 Hour: 1/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The "Axioms" Of Nature
bluegenes
Member (Idle past 2506 days)
Posts: 3119
From: U.K.
Joined: 01-24-2007


Message 67 of 297 (486547)
10-22-2008 12:06 PM
Reply to: Message 59 by Dawn Bertot
10-22-2008 8:10 AM


Has anyone said it yet?
Bertot writes:
All of these examples will fall in one of the two categories or they change the reality of the situation.
Has anyone said this? They are both able and willing to respond, but they haven't got around to doing it yet.
You need to give Spock a line like "either they have responded or they haven't" in order to get a real truism, in which case Captain Kirk could be reasonably excused for hitting him, I would think.
Even then, there would be the problem of them possibly being in the process of responding while he was speaking.
Bertot writes:
I cant believe anyone is so so silly as not know we are actually speaking about the only two possibile alternatives to the existence of things. An eternal God or the eternality of matter itself. You cannot think or contrive another possibility that does not fall within the two, or is a combination of the two.
We can't? How about seven eternal Goddesses? Or an eternal succession of non-eternal Gods, each creating another before becoming non-existent? Or an eternal set of dimensions in which matter is formed from nothing, or from some unknown entity, or from anti-matter, and universes are created?
There are an infinite number of possibilities in such an unknown area.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 59 by Dawn Bertot, posted 10-22-2008 8:10 AM Dawn Bertot has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024