Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,903 Year: 4,160/9,624 Month: 1,031/974 Week: 358/286 Day: 1/13 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Noah's Flood and the Geologic Layers (was Noah's shallow sea)
roxrkool
Member (Idle past 1018 days)
Posts: 1497
From: Nevada
Joined: 03-23-2003


Message 12 of 219 (83527)
02-05-2004 6:05 PM
Reply to: Message 11 by edge
02-05-2004 5:44 PM


Re: reply 2 (Hey if there's any creationists out there, if they kick me off, you're welco
edge writes:
What utter gibberish! I think you are a troll.
That's why I'm ignoring him/her. Well, that and the annoying attitude.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 11 by edge, posted 02-05-2004 5:44 PM edge has not replied

  
roxrkool
Member (Idle past 1018 days)
Posts: 1497
From: Nevada
Joined: 03-23-2003


Message 87 of 219 (84712)
02-09-2004 11:59 AM
Reply to: Message 83 by simple
02-09-2004 2:40 AM


Re: pick a plauseable please people
simple writes:
The point is not that that limestone is NOT formed today like that today, (todays little amounts are not the question, but the large ammounts of the flood time) but that the limestone in the flood had a different method.
Please, tell us WHERE the flood deposits are in the geologic record. Heck, I'd even settle for showing us where they are in North America alone!
[This message has been edited by roxrkool, 02-09-2004]

This message is a reply to:
 Message 83 by simple, posted 02-09-2004 2:40 AM simple has not replied

  
roxrkool
Member (Idle past 1018 days)
Posts: 1497
From: Nevada
Joined: 03-23-2003


Message 90 of 219 (84719)
02-09-2004 12:08 PM
Reply to: Message 89 by Randy
02-09-2004 12:03 PM


Re: lime lime everywhere
Yet another example of Walt NOT stopping to think about what he's saying. He just says whatever sounds good.
Good scientific method, that.
[This message has been edited by roxrkool, 02-09-2004]

This message is a reply to:
 Message 89 by Randy, posted 02-09-2004 12:03 PM Randy has not replied

  
roxrkool
Member (Idle past 1018 days)
Posts: 1497
From: Nevada
Joined: 03-23-2003


Message 94 of 219 (84985)
02-10-2004 10:21 AM
Reply to: Message 91 by simple
02-10-2004 1:05 AM


Typical
simple writes:
Take a big breath, and admit how little you know
Simple, you've got some cajones.
Here you are, obviously lacking a geologic education arguing geology with professional geologists and then accusing them of knowing less than you. lmao
Typical.
Listen, when you argue in ignorance, it DOESN'T help your cause. It just reinforces what we already know about most armchair creationists - they don't know what the hell they're talking about.
Back to geology:
Since I know so little, why not educate me.
SHOW ME WHERE THE FLOOD LAYERS ARE.
Earlier I asked for the North American layers, now I'll just ask you to show me where in your little neck of the woods they are - in the Canadian Rockies???
Surely that should be SIMPLE for someone with such a superb grasp of geology.
[This message has been edited by roxrkool, 02-10-2004]

This message is a reply to:
 Message 91 by simple, posted 02-10-2004 1:05 AM simple has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 95 by Joe Meert, posted 02-10-2004 11:49 AM roxrkool has replied

  
roxrkool
Member (Idle past 1018 days)
Posts: 1497
From: Nevada
Joined: 03-23-2003


Message 96 of 219 (85029)
02-10-2004 11:56 AM
Reply to: Message 95 by Joe Meert
02-10-2004 11:49 AM


Re: Typical
Maybe you're right. Youthful exuberance is not a bad thing and I'm not one for blindly following others, but it never hurts to treat people with respect.
[This message has been edited by roxrkool, 02-10-2004]

This message is a reply to:
 Message 95 by Joe Meert, posted 02-10-2004 11:49 AM Joe Meert has not replied

  
roxrkool
Member (Idle past 1018 days)
Posts: 1497
From: Nevada
Joined: 03-23-2003


Message 137 of 219 (85741)
02-12-2004 10:26 AM
Reply to: Message 136 by simple
02-12-2004 2:22 AM


Re: what's up?
Ned's, right, there is absolutely NO trace of the flood.
I don't see why you're even arguing the point seeing as you can't tell us which geologic strata represent the flood either. Here we are on the 10th page of this thread and still no flood layers from simple the Creationist.
If I were you, I'd keep your 12 year-old sounding snide remarks to yourself until you can answer this one simple question -
WHERE ARE THE FLOOD LAYERS?
Edited for grammatical reasons - DOH!!
[This message has been edited by roxrkool, 02-12-2004]

This message is a reply to:
 Message 136 by simple, posted 02-12-2004 2:22 AM simple has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 144 by simple, posted 02-12-2004 2:33 PM roxrkool has replied

  
roxrkool
Member (Idle past 1018 days)
Posts: 1497
From: Nevada
Joined: 03-23-2003


Message 145 of 219 (85833)
02-12-2004 2:56 PM
Reply to: Message 144 by simple
02-12-2004 2:33 PM


Re: what's up?
FINALLY!!! An answer. Now we can get to work...

This message is a reply to:
 Message 144 by simple, posted 02-12-2004 2:33 PM simple has not replied

  
roxrkool
Member (Idle past 1018 days)
Posts: 1497
From: Nevada
Joined: 03-23-2003


Message 148 of 219 (85838)
02-12-2004 3:01 PM
Reply to: Message 144 by simple
02-12-2004 2:33 PM


Re: what's up?
removed weird double-post.
[This message has been edited by roxrkool, 02-12-2004]

This message is a reply to:
 Message 144 by simple, posted 02-12-2004 2:33 PM simple has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 150 by simple, posted 02-12-2004 3:11 PM roxrkool has not replied
 Message 151 by simple, posted 02-12-2004 3:11 PM roxrkool has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024