I would cling to it quite tenaciously. I have just about done all the the discovery I expect to do with Gould's prolix contribution to our discussion and having previously commented on the light or rather lack of it from any clade Fuytuma is associated with, NRM COULD if it directs the EVIDENCE that say creationism proports in reference to criticizing on-going discussions of evolution that Gould incomprehensibly notes Ernst Mayr adheres to A PRIORI without ANY evidence (this CAN NOT be the case with creation science else there would not even be paid 10$/month to stream this site etc). One can then quickly converge with the Morris's as the NEGATIVE impact of evolutionary law etc OR continue to attempt to dreg up some new evidence. My suspicion is that the saddles of balanced selection concerns are actually troughs of a hyperbola in a higer dimensional catastroophic space but I will a-wait a more appro time to discuss my latest theoretical speculation of friction physics and cell biology that could cause gradualism via NRM to return to the Ghost of GOuld pAst.
We need a better learning curve in c/e beofre this upper bound can be reached without simply calling the the DOC etc. The apririness of Mayr is what Croizat objected to. The strange thing is that I had conversations with Simon Levin about Ecosystem Structures and Fractals and LEVIN did not represent my ideas as Gould seems to have taken for STASIS which Levin also did not understand. How can I expect any oneelse then? Levin went on to co-author with Kaufmann and Gould with or without Fuytuma can be read IN this orbit. Sorry Evos the game is over and up. Please put in anouther DIME.TRON;
™ Version 4.2