Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 59 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,920 Year: 4,177/9,624 Month: 1,048/974 Week: 7/368 Day: 7/11 Hour: 1/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Page v. Borger
jdean33442
Inactive Member


Message 11 of 92 (30330)
01-27-2003 2:02 PM
Reply to: Message 10 by nator
01-27-2003 12:34 PM


quote:
Your claim that women are more emotional than men is, well, utter crap.
Just look at men's over-the-top emotional behavior during domestic violence and abuse, athletic events, war, and rock concerts.
No one is free of emotions, however, you point out only extreme cases. I don't understand what rock concerts and athletic events have to do with emotions. Last time I checked aggression is not an emotion.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 10 by nator, posted 01-27-2003 12:34 PM nator has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 12 by nator, posted 01-27-2003 2:16 PM jdean33442 has replied

  
jdean33442
Inactive Member


Message 13 of 92 (30341)
01-27-2003 2:53 PM
Reply to: Message 12 by nator
01-27-2003 2:16 PM


quote:
Exactly. That's my point. Dr. Page was "called a girl" because his responses were judged as containing any emotion at all.
Your views contradict themselves. I had no idea you had a "point".
quote:
I only needed to point out any case to show that the idea that only females display emotion to be false.
What a warped mind you have. No one stated men do not show emotions. Women are MORE emotional. The key word is MORE. Take the feminist goggles off.
quote:
Um, men are very emotional at athletic events and rock concerts (both as participants and observers).
Men shouting, jumping around, celebrating, hugging, screaming can all be observed at these events.
People can feel aggressive, no?
No. Aggressive is an adjective not an emotion. You can feel angry.
quote:
BTW, I can't help but notice that you seem to be hounding me on this board. You respond nearly exclusively to my posts. Why?
I reply when I see others post ignorant rhetoric and biased falsehoods. It is you 9 times out of 10 I reply to. I am not planning it that way. Don't be flattered. Otherwise I just read and learn and keep quiet.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 12 by nator, posted 01-27-2003 2:16 PM nator has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 14 by Coragyps, posted 01-27-2003 6:03 PM jdean33442 has not replied

  
jdean33442
Inactive Member


Message 51 of 92 (30759)
01-30-2003 5:48 PM
Reply to: Message 50 by nator
01-30-2003 8:57 AM


quote:
You are the one not answering his specific questions, Peter.
You are running away without addressing the pesticide resistance/evolutionary arms race issue, nor are you addressing the issue of you claiming that you have evidence from fossils of an entire genome, or something like that.
Quetzal is quite adept at debate. Why don't you let Quetzal defend himself? And where is your pro and/or con address of these issues? Stop attacking the guy just to attack him. It's stale.
Running away? You attack me indirectly and refuse to reply to anything I put directly at you.
Perhaps PB will give up his pursuit of creationism and become a sandwich artist at a local deli. All because of your hard nosed (and convincing I must add) post. Great job lass!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 50 by nator, posted 01-30-2003 8:57 AM nator has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 54 by nator, posted 01-31-2003 10:39 AM jdean33442 has not replied
 Message 56 by nator, posted 01-31-2003 10:50 AM jdean33442 has not replied
 Message 57 by Quetzal, posted 01-31-2003 11:26 AM jdean33442 has not replied

  
jdean33442
Inactive Member


Message 62 of 92 (30872)
01-31-2003 3:27 PM
Reply to: Message 60 by Adminnemooseus
01-31-2003 2:25 PM


What does it matter if some one is registered? Registration is instant. Any one can do it. And of course if you just registered some people will use "newbie" insults. I don't see the relevance of registration.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 60 by Adminnemooseus, posted 01-31-2003 2:25 PM Adminnemooseus has not replied

  
jdean33442
Inactive Member


Message 85 of 92 (31182)
02-03-2003 7:19 PM
Reply to: Message 65 by nator
01-31-2003 9:33 PM


quote:
Jimmy Dean the Sausage King is new around here and hasn't figured out how to gain respect yet. I guess his mama didn't teach him that to earn respect in civilized company one must treat others with respect.
In fact, I don't think he has uttered a single word WRT Biology or Creationism.
Methinks I smell a troll, not someone interested in either.
Apparently you were called a troll on another forum and it worked to get rid of you. I don't blame you for using a proven technique to annoy me in hope I will go away. Perhaps some more whining to the admins will work?
I do not normally post to either the Creation or Evolution forums due to my ignorance on both subjects. As I stated before, I normally just read and try to learn a thing or two.
Allow me to explain something to you.
I sit at a computer all day unless I must attend meetings. We all need breaks from the monotony of work and I use this forum to make the time go by faster. I never claimed to be committed to the cause. The board usually has a worthwhile read or at least an amusing post to distract me for a short period of time.
You on the other hand, work at a deli all day where there are no computers. You jump in your little subaru, haul ass home to get on the internet as fast as possible so you can go to sites like this and post your murky views of feminism and flag burning. This is your escape from life whereas I am only trying to pass some time during my work day. I can understand why you get so mad. I am, afterall, intruding in the one thing you look forward to day after day. I don't mean to be the hurricane of your paradise.
All apologies miss.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 65 by nator, posted 01-31-2003 9:33 PM nator has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 89 by nator, posted 02-04-2003 9:56 AM jdean33442 has not replied

  
jdean33442
Inactive Member


Message 86 of 92 (31184)
02-03-2003 7:41 PM
Reply to: Message 83 by nator
02-03-2003 2:33 PM


quote:
Oh, and if my argument was flawed, I wouldn't be able to verbally crush anybody.
Which you have yet to accomplish.
quote:
However, it is also true that working mothers have had their children taken away from them because they worked outside the home, and it is also true that fathers do a great deal more abandoning of their children than mothers, and fathers fail to pay child support at an alarming rate, and only recently have either of these problems of irresponibility been addressed in any serious way by the courts.
??? Where the hell have you ever heard of a woman losing custody of their child based solely on the fact they work outside the home?
Most men abandoned their children out of a hatred for the women who conceived them. Women can be quite nasty.
quote:
Rape and domestic violence are real, and not rare. Men kill their wives and girlfriends at a rate that far exceeds that of women killing their husbands and boyfriends.
Shouldn't the woman physique evolve into something which could protect her from such a predator? Men kill more because we are better at it. It's the emotion thing we discussed previously.
quote:
Statistics show that one in three college-age men would rape a woman if they knew they could get away with it.
The other two college-aged men are lying.
quote:
Imagine living in my world, as a woman, for a little while, and then you tell me who is at war with whom.
Uhg. I don't think I could handle smelling like mustard and greasy deli meat every day. No thanks.
quote:
"according to the FBI, in over 95% of all domestic abuse violence, the man is the batterer. The injuries that battered women receive are at least as serious as 90% of all violent felony crimes, yet under state laws, domestic violence is almost always a misdemeanor."
This is a crap statistic. What man is going to call the cops and report he was battered by a woman?
quote:
See above. Men, for whatever reason, tend to be more violent.
Men are more violent because of women. They drive us to it.
quote:
Let's see. I talk about raising women's status, and this, by definition, "destroys the value of men?"
Let's use your own quote to rub your nose in it, shall we?
quote:
If you mean I diminish the roles of men that have been overvalued compared to the undervalued roles of women, then yes, I challenge that notion.
You don't just view women as being undervalued. You also think men are overvalued which proves you want to lower the evil penis race down a peg or two. Your jealousy is obvious and not worn well.
quote:
I hate what our society has done to men. Some, like you seem to, think that for women to rise up, men must go down.
No, you said that.
quote:
If you have something specific to say which counters my criticisms of the Southern Baptist edict, or evidence which challenges my divorce statistics, or anything else specific, then bring it forward.
Must you get spanked on this again?
quote:
Oh, being a femminist requires quite a lot of conviction, considering that people like you fear people like me. Fear leads to hate, and hate leads to suffering. This is the path of the Dark Side.
Men don't fear you and your closet feminist cohorts. Annoying yes. Fear no. Do you fear a jack russell terrier who is always yipping?
quote:
I still do not have any specific examples of where I said what you say I did.
See above and read slowly. It's ok to move your lips when you read.
Do you have a mullet to match your feminist attitude?
**Predicted Schraf response**
Shraf: Personal attack. I will point you to the guidelines. I have notified the admins of your behavior!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 83 by nator, posted 02-03-2003 2:33 PM nator has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 88 by wj, posted 02-04-2003 1:56 AM jdean33442 has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024