Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,905 Year: 4,162/9,624 Month: 1,033/974 Week: 360/286 Day: 3/13 Hour: 1/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   My "Beef" With Atheists
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 26 of 123 (482563)
09-17-2008 1:08 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by Watson75
09-16-2008 12:09 AM


TL; DR
The question now is the following: does this axiom lend itself to the notion of an intelligent force behind it in a realm outside of it beyond our comprehension and perception, or does it lend itself to the notion of a spontaneous birth that arrived from no-intelligence and came forth from “nothing” itself?
Truthfully, I don't have the answer to that question. No one does, who can at least fully provide the required evidence to the rest of the world to make either side presumed correct.
So you've identified the own problem with your argument?
As far as the rest of it, from the conversations I've had with atheists, apparently you dont know anything about them.
The universe did not come from "nothing", according to the athiests and also according to them, you are wrong that, to them, reality is a belief based on where there is no reality.
You need to find out more about the beliefs of athiests instead of subscribing one to them.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Watson75, posted 09-16-2008 12:09 AM Watson75 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 27 by Watson75, posted 09-17-2008 1:20 AM New Cat's Eye has replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 31 of 123 (482579)
09-17-2008 1:32 AM
Reply to: Message 27 by Watson75
09-17-2008 1:20 AM


I equate non-intelligence as "nothing."
Dumbass.
That's your problem right there.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 27 by Watson75, posted 09-17-2008 1:20 AM Watson75 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 33 by Watson75, posted 09-17-2008 1:43 AM New Cat's Eye has replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 35 of 123 (482586)
09-17-2008 1:57 AM
Reply to: Message 33 by Watson75
09-17-2008 1:43 AM


Nice ad hominem...
Thank you.
Should I state it more clearly?
Nah, it was clear enough.
For the purpose of this argument, in relation to the creation of the Universe, if there was no intelligence involved, that is as good as nothing, atleast in my book.
That makes your book shitty.
What is so wrong with that?
Well, obviously nothing causes nothing. We have something. It couldn't have come from nothing. Honestly, your book sucks.
So it could have been a speck of dirt, or it could have been a candy cane, it doesn't matter... its the equivalent of nothing as far as this argument goes.
Obviously, you don't understand the physics behind the Big Bang.
There was never nothing.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 33 by Watson75, posted 09-17-2008 1:43 AM Watson75 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 37 by Watson75, posted 09-17-2008 2:02 AM New Cat's Eye has replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 39 of 123 (482592)
09-17-2008 2:13 AM
Reply to: Message 37 by Watson75
09-17-2008 2:02 AM


quote:
That makes your book shitty.
Good, I don't want you to read it.
Have fun continuing to pick apart semantics and dodging the issue. That'll get you places.
Catholic Scientist = 1
Watson75 = 0
Your argument phailed.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 37 by Watson75, posted 09-17-2008 2:02 AM Watson75 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 42 by Watson75, posted 09-17-2008 2:28 AM New Cat's Eye has replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 45 of 123 (482605)
09-17-2008 2:50 AM
Reply to: Message 42 by Watson75
09-17-2008 2:28 AM


Thanks for identifying yourself as a loser before we all start investing time into your posts.
Good day, sir.
Oh wait:
Here's the points you failed to acknowledge:
quote:
What is so wrong with that?
Well, obviously nothing causes nothing. We have something. It couldn't have come from nothing. Honestly, your book sucks.
So it could have been a speck of dirt, or it could have been a candy cane, it doesn't matter... its the equivalent of nothing as far as this argument goes.
Obviously, you don't understand the physics behind the Big Bang.
There was never nothing.
Edited by Catholic Scientist, : No reason given.
Edited by Catholic Scientist, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 42 by Watson75, posted 09-17-2008 2:28 AM Watson75 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 47 by Watson75, posted 09-17-2008 2:56 AM New Cat's Eye has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024