Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,902 Year: 4,159/9,624 Month: 1,030/974 Week: 357/286 Day: 0/13 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Who & what are the demons ?
Phat
Member
Posts: 18348
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.0


Message 167 of 349 (671749)
08-30-2012 3:10 AM
Reply to: Message 166 by Straggler
08-29-2012 12:42 PM


Re: Wrongness vs realness
Straggler writes:
Is not what is objectively real and what is not a rather important factor here?
yes, and i think you would agree with the following statement:
quote:
According to the ethical objectivist, the truth or falsity of typical moral judgments does not depend upon the beliefs or feelings of any person or group of persons. This view holds that moral propositions are analogous to propositions about chemistry, biology, or history: they describe (or fail to describe) a mind-independent reality. When they describe it accurately, they are trueno matter what anyone believes, hopes, wishes, or feels. When they fail to describe this mind-independent moral reality, they are falseno matter what anyone believes, hopes, wishes, or feels.
Thus for you, what is real is only what is provable or "evident"
and i can respect that, though im more of a leap of faith subjectivist

This message is a reply to:
 Message 166 by Straggler, posted 08-29-2012 12:42 PM Straggler has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 168 by Straggler, posted 08-30-2012 8:41 AM Phat has seen this message but not replied

  
Phat
Member
Posts: 18348
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.0


Message 179 of 349 (672244)
09-05-2012 2:39 AM
Reply to: Message 178 by Straggler
09-04-2012 1:06 PM


Objective vs Subjective
Straggler writes:
The question is where this idea of demons comes from and all the objective evidence indicates that they are things invented by humans for reasons that have everything to do with human psychology and nothing to do with the actual existence of real demons.
And as one who has had subjective evidence, I dont buy the idea that demons are not real.
I dont think the verdict can be issued so easily...at this point.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 178 by Straggler, posted 09-04-2012 1:06 PM Straggler has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 180 by Tangle, posted 09-05-2012 3:49 AM Phat has seen this message but not replied
 Message 181 by Straggler, posted 09-05-2012 4:56 AM Phat has seen this message but not replied
 Message 183 by ringo, posted 09-05-2012 12:45 PM Phat has replied

  
Phat
Member
Posts: 18348
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.0


Message 184 of 349 (672341)
09-07-2012 3:24 AM
Reply to: Message 183 by ringo
09-05-2012 12:45 PM


Re: Objective vs Subjective
Ringo writes:
Suppose I was standing right beside you when you had your experience and I said, "I think he's faking." Would that shake your faith in demons? Suppose somebody else in the room said, "I think he's mentally ill." Would that shake your faith in demons?
If you were in the same room that we were observing what we observed and you said it was fake, it would change my confidence based on the perceptions of myself and others.
If more people in the room doubted the event, it would shake my perception of the event being as genuine and undeniable as I saw it with the entire room in agreement. In fact, I would question what I experienced a lot more had there been witnesses who were less sure and/or convinced of the event.
Straggler writes:
Do you have any reason beyond belief to attribute the cause of this experience of yours to demons (or whatever supernatural entity it is you are alluding to)?
No. I admit to a bias in favor of my explanation given.
Edited by Phat, : added quote

This message is a reply to:
 Message 183 by ringo, posted 09-05-2012 12:45 PM ringo has seen this message but not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 185 by Straggler, posted 09-07-2012 5:30 AM Phat has seen this message but not replied

  
Phat
Member
Posts: 18348
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.0


Message 212 of 349 (673525)
09-20-2012 2:24 AM
Reply to: Message 135 by ringo
08-22-2012 12:04 PM


Re: Maturity and Rationality in a Believer
Phat writes:
In my opinion, a demon can not influence a human to do anything that that human had not previously decided to do anyway
Ringo writes:
In that case, allow me to whip out Occam's Razor. If a demon can not influence a human to do anything that that human had not previously decided to do anyway - such as speaking in "otherworldly" voices - why do you need to postulate the existence of the demon at all?
Well....I had to explain the unusual phenomenon and event that I witnessed in some way. I ruled out being tricked by others...for reasons that I deemed valid. The options and alternatives at that point were rather limited. Jar might suggest that we simply label it as an unexplained and unknown event. This is probably the most honest approach, so my conclusion may have been due to bias and premature at best.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 135 by ringo, posted 08-22-2012 12:04 PM ringo has seen this message but not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 213 by Straggler, posted 09-20-2012 6:12 AM Phat has replied

  
Phat
Member
Posts: 18348
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.0


Message 214 of 349 (673565)
09-20-2012 10:47 AM
Reply to: Message 213 by Straggler
09-20-2012 6:12 AM


Demons, Influence and Allowance
Straggler writes:
This just doesn't make any sense. On one hand you seem to be saying that demons can't influence what humans decide to do and on the other you seem to be attributing something you witnessed a person do to demonic influence. This seems contradictory.
can you clarify what role you believe the demon played in this example of yours?
Point taken. I can only theorize that the person whom I observed was oppressed. The behavior was not his usual behavior, and the voices were---honestly---something that a human could not duplicate. He had to have "let them" influence him at some point in his life prior to the manifestation.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 213 by Straggler, posted 09-20-2012 6:12 AM Straggler has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 215 by Straggler, posted 09-20-2012 11:23 AM Phat has replied

  
Phat
Member
Posts: 18348
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.0


Message 216 of 349 (673784)
09-22-2012 10:38 PM
Reply to: Message 215 by Straggler
09-20-2012 11:23 AM


Re: Demons, Influence and Allowance
Straggler writes:
So at the time you observed him he was acting under the influence of a demon but he had decided to let himself be influenced by said demon - That is what you believe?
Yes, but keep in mind, as I have stated before, that I am predisposed towards accepting such beliefs. A true skeptic would be scratching his head to this very day.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 215 by Straggler, posted 09-20-2012 11:23 AM Straggler has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 217 by Straggler, posted 09-25-2012 9:06 AM Phat has replied

  
Phat
Member
Posts: 18348
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.0


Message 218 of 349 (673958)
09-25-2012 9:45 AM
Reply to: Message 217 by Straggler
09-25-2012 9:06 AM


Re: Demons, Influence and Allowance
Straggler writes:
What I am interested in is the basis on which you have concluded that he decided to let himself be influenced by said demon?
How have you concluded that he was complicit rather than resistant to this demonic influence?
Its been awhile, but IIRC, his close friends concluded that there were generational "curses" or spirits within his family lineage. I simply made the justification that the behavior(and cause of such behavior) was not really his desire....he was a victim. These points that you bring up are interesting, though. Bak then we simply assumed that anything that spectacular had to be demons and the particulars were not really important to us...in our view there was no real science to exorcism...just faith that the Holy Spirit would always overcome the other wannabes. More recently, as I have matured (aside from still holding irrational beliefs) I conclude that demons are common and are a bit like catching a cold...anyone can have them but they wont usually kill you.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 217 by Straggler, posted 09-25-2012 9:06 AM Straggler has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 219 by Straggler, posted 09-25-2012 1:12 PM Phat has replied

  
Phat
Member
Posts: 18348
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.0


Message 220 of 349 (673989)
09-25-2012 2:04 PM
Reply to: Message 219 by Straggler
09-25-2012 1:12 PM


Re: Demons, Influence and Allowance
Straggler writes:
How can someone be a victim of demonic influence if the demon can't make them doing anything they hadn't decided to do anyway?
To clear this up can you answer the following - Do you think a demon could potentially make me or you do something we didn't want to do?
Honestly I don't know. Using the cold analogy, once I have a cold I cant help coughing and becoming stuffed up. I may have at one time been a victim in that my immune system was low and I caught a draft or caught germs from coughing people at work. i dont want to cough, but the mechanism is established. Does this make any sense?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 219 by Straggler, posted 09-25-2012 1:12 PM Straggler has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 221 by Straggler, posted 09-27-2012 1:51 PM Phat has replied

  
Phat
Member
Posts: 18348
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.0


Message 222 of 349 (674287)
09-27-2012 4:13 PM
Reply to: Message 221 by Straggler
09-27-2012 1:51 PM


Re: Demons, Influence and Allowance
Straggler writes:
I don't get the cold/cough analogy because nobody chooses to have a cold/cough....
So I'm a bit lost as to the role you believe the demon played in this example of your to be honest. it seems very confused.
Keep in mind that I am but speculating. There is no real science to this religious/spiritual stuff, anyway.
Nobody may choose to have a cough or cold, but they do like dancing in the rain. (with a lowered immune system of which they were unaware.
Nobody may choose to allow a demon to enter/influence them, but they do love to watch porn, associate with nebulous characters, or knowingly mock God.
John Eckhardt writes:
If we can be subjected to the consequences of sin to the fourth generation, as Exodus 20:5 says, and a biblical generation is 40 years, then we are subject to the demonic influence of what people in our family lines were doing 160 years before us. This means that, taking the year 2000 as a starting point, we are affected by what those in our bloodlines were doing as far back as the year 1840.
Think about it. Even if a person has a great genealogy, he can't know everything his ancestors were doing in secret that long ago. And if, in addition to generational sin, he has committed personal sin or has been traumatized or victimized in any way, by the time he comes to the Lord, he is going to need deliverance on some level. There is just too much defilement and contamination on Earth to escape it.
The previous article sums up a mainstream belief in this stuff. Im not sure if I buy it, but, after witnessing odd behavior at so-called deliverance sessions, I tentatively concluded that 80% of it was faked, which leaves 20% unexplained.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 221 by Straggler, posted 09-27-2012 1:51 PM Straggler has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 223 by Theodoric, posted 09-27-2012 5:08 PM Phat has replied
 Message 228 by Straggler, posted 09-28-2012 6:51 AM Phat has replied
 Message 229 by Theodoric, posted 09-28-2012 11:11 AM Phat has replied

  
Phat
Member
Posts: 18348
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.0


Message 224 of 349 (674292)
09-27-2012 5:25 PM
Reply to: Message 223 by Theodoric
09-27-2012 5:08 PM


Re: Demons, Influence and Allowance
How do you make the leap from unexplained to demons? I see and hear things all the time that are unexplained. Whoopee. Doesn't mean with scientific investigation they cannot be explained. That being said there are lots of things science can not explain. Do you subscribe that the explanation is supernatural for these too?
No. Quite honestly, Theodoric, I am biased towards woo type explanations, since I have experienced the emotion of such stuff. Perhaps it is a bit illogical, but im a bit of a strange one.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 223 by Theodoric, posted 09-27-2012 5:08 PM Theodoric has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 225 by Theodoric, posted 09-27-2012 5:29 PM Phat has replied

  
Phat
Member
Posts: 18348
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.0


Message 226 of 349 (674346)
09-27-2012 10:29 PM
Reply to: Message 225 by Theodoric
09-27-2012 5:29 PM


Re: Demons, Influence and Allowance
Theodoric writes:
"Woo" is not an explanation. It is an excuse for intellectual laziness.
Perhaps, but not everything without evidence and/or proof should be disregarded as a possibility. Of course, now that I said that someone will bring up fairies,bigfoot, and loch ness and claim the same status.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 225 by Theodoric, posted 09-27-2012 5:29 PM Theodoric has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 227 by Straggler, posted 09-28-2012 6:46 AM Phat has seen this message but not replied

  
Phat
Member
Posts: 18348
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.0


Message 230 of 349 (674969)
10-04-2012 4:42 PM
Reply to: Message 228 by Straggler
09-28-2012 6:51 AM


Re: Demons, Influence and Allowance
straggler writes:
So lets say I'm sitting here watching porn whilst knowingly mocking god and let's also assume I have low demonic resistance.
Can a demon now, in your view, start influencing my behaviour to make me do things I don't want to do?
All of us do things that we don't want to do. Some of these things are minor things in our minds and hearts. Others are quite important...so that we essentially sin against ourselves when doing them. I agree that for some folks, porn is no big deal. Perhaps another thing is a big deal....stealing from your mother, or lying to your wife. When a person knowingly goes against their own morality, they allow a legal entrance for the demons. When we are enticed, God withdraws His power and lets us flounder in our own power, at which point satan has claim. (thats what the dogma teaches, at any rate)
What is it you think I am opening myself up to in terms of demonic influence here?
You are becoming double minded, and are no longer certain of what it is you really want or believe. Being of two minds is being weak. It is also being susceptible to following a path not initially of your own choosing.
Romans 7:15 writes:
For I do not understand my own actions. For I do not do what I want, but I do the very thing I hate.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 228 by Straggler, posted 09-28-2012 6:51 AM Straggler has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 231 by Straggler, posted 10-05-2012 6:21 AM Phat has replied
 Message 236 by Omnivorous, posted 10-06-2012 9:47 AM Phat has seen this message but not replied

  
Phat
Member
Posts: 18348
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.0


Message 232 of 349 (675038)
10-05-2012 10:50 AM
Reply to: Message 229 by Theodoric
09-28-2012 11:11 AM


Re: Demons, Influence and Allowance
Theodoric writes:
Your whole idea of demons is vague and nebulous. It is a classic example of not knowing how to define something but knowing it when you see it. Subjectivity at its finest.
How can any definition of the supernatural (God or demons) even be objective?
I cant expect you--an unbeliever--to define it any less vague than I can, except to say that in your conclusion it is all in my head.
Some things by definition have to be vague and nebulous.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 229 by Theodoric, posted 09-28-2012 11:11 AM Theodoric has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 233 by Straggler, posted 10-05-2012 11:45 AM Phat has replied

  
Phat
Member
Posts: 18348
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.0


Message 234 of 349 (675096)
10-05-2012 4:59 PM
Reply to: Message 233 by Straggler
10-05-2012 11:45 AM


Re: Demons, Influence and Allowance
Straggler writes:
In fact isn't the entire idea of defining things to ensure that we all mean the same thing when we use certain language......? definitions are by definition objective. Otherwise there is no point to them.
Is it possible for you to accept that a thing could exist even if you or I were unable to define it, or do you hold to the belief that anything unobjectionable is by definition as good as not there?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 233 by Straggler, posted 10-05-2012 11:45 AM Straggler has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 238 by Straggler, posted 10-07-2012 12:11 PM Phat has replied

  
Phat
Member
Posts: 18348
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.0


Message 235 of 349 (675119)
10-06-2012 7:34 AM
Reply to: Message 231 by Straggler
10-05-2012 6:21 AM


Re: Demons, Influence and Allowance
Perhaps I can desribe the thought process another way, without the label of "demons".
The Beast described in Rational Recovery is an example of our inner addictive voice. The way that we talk to ourselves and address ourselves allows for subtle behaviors that are not us--and yet that are us.
Understanding how this inner battle works is a key to its defeat, but our animal nature is very persistent and we need Am understanding of AVRT short for addictive voice recognition training. By now you are probably wondering if I am willing to admit that demons are all creations of our own minds...in which case I won't say . I'll let you draw your own conclusions!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 231 by Straggler, posted 10-05-2012 6:21 AM Straggler has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 237 by Theodoric, posted 10-06-2012 10:00 AM Phat has seen this message but not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024