Ok well since no supernaturalism exists, only naturalism.
No, science (as asgara pointed out in post 59) has no method of determining the validity of the supernatural. Science only deals with the natural; what is so hard to understand? Science does not
exclude the possibility of the supernatural; it simply doesn't have the ability to examine it.
How does God fit into this picture?
Good question. Of course, I do not know. I only have an idea, but I cannot offer any proof to back it up. But whether God started life spontaneously or gradually (or another way), has nothing to do with my belief
in God.
Why would it? It's as if you believe that if you can somehow prove evolution to be false, that creationism wins by default.
Wrong.
You would then have to prove that all the other creation accounts from all the other religions are wrong.
If you can prove evolution to be wrong
and simultaneously prove creation to be true based on the available (or new) evidence, then you would win the Nobel prize. Good luck.
I hope you arent going to say that God invented the first cell so life can evolve.
That's a good theory! Perhaps God
did cause everything to be 'just right' for the formation of life, and 'it' simply happened.
Was it divine providence or happenstance? Or something else? I do not know.
No supernaturalism exists in a evolutionary naturalist world.
How do you know? You should have said, "No supernaturalism can be proven to exist in a naturalist world."
To get back on topic almeyda, if I discover through casual research that smoking cures cancer, I will not throw away my trust in medical science; everytime I read the bible (rarely) and I find a something that is false, historically and/or scientifically inaccurate, I do not refuse to believe that the rest of it is crap.
Jesus said to Love your neighbor as yourself. I try to follow that as much as I can. I usually have to meditate (in quite prayer of just silence my mind) to assist me.
My neighbors are as F'd up as I am! lol!