Willow wrote:
Can we add Francis Crick's space aliens to this list ?
Previously, you assert the Gospels to be myths.
Not even your precious Jesus Seminar believes this.
Burton L. Mack asserts that the "Q"/source document is contained within the gospels. He simply discards every passage and text except the natural sayings of Jesus and declares these to be the "Q" document. ("Lost Gospel: Book of "Q", [1994])
Seems you are out of touch with your own "scholarship".
I have no idea what point you are trying to make.
Personally, I really don't care whether the Gospels are myths in their entirity or based on real world events with mythical elements thrown in. While I find the arguments of Earl Doherty's "Jesus Puzzle" compelling, I also respect the honest findings of those scholars from the Jesus Seminar and others such as Burton Mack who do not go so far as to deny a historical character at the core of Christianity.
The fact that we have nothing written about Jesus in either Christian or non-Christian literature until decades after his life is compelling evidence in favour of an entirely mythical Jesus, but I don't deny the Christ myth may have originated from an actual messiahic nutcase, a self deluded fool, or a genuinely nice guy who had the best intentions to help those around him. From that central core has arisen mythology containing supernatural claims, that maybe even the historical Jesus might have found embarassing.
Roswell, Medjugorje, Sai Baba and the Bermuda triangle have real people and real events at their core. The supernatural claims derive from the rapidly growing mythology that followed immediatly after.