Thank you, Faith, and I have restored your privedges. (though how you managed to edit when they were suspended I don't know --- not I DID submit the changes -- I'll check times)
I think you took the POTM a bit strongly, btw, though perhaps looking at it I can understand.
First it is a POTM because if is clear and well worded.
Second, it is a POTM because it demonstrates a particular point very strongly.
I did have some feeling of amusement at the nature of it in context. I am sure you will never understand that which is too bad.