Willowtree's Scientific Evidence against Evolution

Willowtree, once again you seem to imply that every scientist that accepts evolution is an Atheist or Agonistic. This is false. Also you imply that all scientists that accept evolution are working together to try to prove evolution to everyone else.Then you claim that evolution and theism can never reach a middle ground. With this statement you insult about half the people in the US. The very fact that these people exist proves your argument wrong. First of all the language used on this forum is almost always understandable to people that haven't had any formal education in the sciences. Also I’m sure that the people on this forum would be happy to explain something in layman terms if you ask them. You may not understand the language used by a physicist but it doesn't mean they are trying to deceive you.

Double post[This message has been edited by Rand Al'Thor, 01-03-2004]

It has already been shown that evolution and atheism do not go hand in hand, accept it. Please find a new argumnet.

---

"If the gods listened to the prayers of men, all humankind would quickly perish since they constantly pray for many evils to befall one another."
-- Epicurus

Be careful Light, if you put down Willowtree's beloved Dr. Gene Scott Willowtree is likely to preach to you for hours about Dr. Scott's profound achievements.

I personaly would like to see more scientific evidence against evolution given that that was the purpose of this thread.

*fart*

I agree with Ned, this thread was made to address scientific evidence against evolution. Let's keep bible discussions and the existence of god to the other threads.

And it is the Christians that are arbitrarily excluding the almighty pink unicorns without evidence!!!!Ok, first of all the existence of theistic evolutionist voids your point. After all, they still believe in god so they should be able to see his "fingerprints" yet somehow they don't. Secondly this thread was made so we could see SCIENTIFIC evidence that falsifies evolution. I am sorry but it doesn't matter what the Romans say. Until you can provide evidence that god exists or evidence that there is a massive Atheistic cover-up going on you arguments are baseless.

Umm, so you just missed the 5 or so threads that have already discussed eye evolution? Wrong, evolution goes against Genesis not god. Just because Genesis is excluded by evolution doesn't mean that there is no god. There is no evidence for god and there is no evidence against.
Once again, I ask if the TOE implies no god then why are there theistic evolutionists and if only belevers in god can see god's fingerprints then why don't theistic evolutionist see them as well? I'm just curious, how do you know you're right? I mean surely you admit that there is a possibility that there is no god. Well, I personally try to avoid getting into the really scientific arguments I let the experts do that. And also the eye and fossil topics have been covered in other threads.

*Bump*Still curious about how Theistic Evolutionists effect Willowtrees arguments.

Well, I would a define a TE as someone who accepts evolution to be true and still believes in a god, Christian or otherwise. Also they believe that god guided Evolution or set Evolution in motion. There might be a more descriptive definition but I think this will suffice for this debate.[This message has been edited by Rand Al'Thor, 02-25-2004]

I'm cold and usually sweat. People like me on hot days. I come in many flavors. What am I?ICECREAM!