|
Author
|
Topic: Willowtree's Scientific Evidence against Evolution
|
Coragyps
Member (Idle past 764 days) Posts: 5553 From: Snyder, Texas, USA Joined: 11-12-2002
|
It's your earliest baby picture, DT. 
|
Coragyps
Member (Idle past 764 days) Posts: 5553 From: Snyder, Texas, USA Joined: 11-12-2002
|
|
Message 45 of 299 (74169)
12-18-2003 8:04 PM
|
Reply to: Message 44 by NosyNed
12-18-2003 7:53 PM
|
|
Spelling
Thylacine is the correct spelling.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 44 by NosyNed, posted 12-18-2003 7:53 PM | | NosyNed has not replied |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 46 by Coragyps, posted 12-18-2003 8:35 PM | | Coragyps has not replied |
|
Coragyps
Member (Idle past 764 days) Posts: 5553 From: Snyder, Texas, USA Joined: 11-12-2002
|
|
|
Message 46 of 299 (74174)
12-18-2003 8:35 PM
|
Reply to: Message 45 by Coragyps
12-18-2003 8:04 PM
|
|
Re: Spelling
There is an article in the 12 Dec issue of Science that goes into eutherian/metatherian ancestry, but the online version requires a subscription. They do link, however, to this index which appears to lead to pdfs with lots of info on thylacines as well as other marsupials.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 45 by Coragyps, posted 12-18-2003 8:04 PM | | Coragyps has not replied |
|
Coragyps
Member (Idle past 764 days) Posts: 5553 From: Snyder, Texas, USA Joined: 11-12-2002
|
|
Message 85 of 299 (75258)
12-26-2003 9:48 PM
|
Reply to: Message 83 by The Elder
12-26-2003 9:29 PM
|
|
I am saying that the FETUS of a Thylicine does not look any different then the full grown Thylicine (except the stripes),SO, what exactly developed because of adaptation or convergent evolution? It may be a long weekend...........
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 83 by The Elder, posted 12-26-2003 9:29 PM | | The Elder has replied |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 86 by The Elder, posted 12-26-2003 9:51 PM | | Coragyps has replied |
|
Coragyps
Member (Idle past 764 days) Posts: 5553 From: Snyder, Texas, USA Joined: 11-12-2002
|
|
|
Message 88 of 299 (75262)
12-26-2003 10:10 PM
|
Reply to: Message 86 by The Elder
12-26-2003 9:51 PM
|
|
Elder, if you come onto a forum titled "Evolution" in a state of ignorance so profound as to think that embryonic development is the same thing as evolution, I feel pretty well justified in thinking that disabusing you of such notions might take even longer than this weekend. Maybe much longer. Go read a high-school biology text.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 86 by The Elder, posted 12-26-2003 9:51 PM | | The Elder has replied |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 90 by The Elder, posted 12-26-2003 10:46 PM | | Coragyps has replied |
|
Coragyps
Member (Idle past 764 days) Posts: 5553 From: Snyder, Texas, USA Joined: 11-12-2002
|
|
|
Message 93 of 299 (75306)
12-27-2003 10:26 AM
|
Reply to: Message 92 by mark24
12-27-2003 4:39 AM
|
|
(Pls note the thylacine "foetus" is about to be born looking at its stage of development, if it hadn't already been).
That was bothering me, too. I'll bet the rent that that picture was of an infant thylacine from the pouch, not a "true" fetus. It's too well developed, to my utterly inexpert eye, to be a pre-birth marsupial. A late-stage placental wolf, perhaps, would look that ready for the outside world.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 92 by mark24, posted 12-27-2003 4:39 AM | | mark24 has replied |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 95 by mark24, posted 12-27-2003 12:33 PM | | Coragyps has not replied |
|
Coragyps
Member (Idle past 764 days) Posts: 5553 From: Snyder, Texas, USA Joined: 11-12-2002
|
|
|
Message 94 of 299 (75307)
12-27-2003 10:32 AM
|
Reply to: Message 90 by The Elder
12-26-2003 10:46 PM
|
|
Elder, I'm sorry that my reading comprehension is so lacking. Perhaps you could clarify for me:
I am saying that the FETUS of a Thylacine does not look any different then the full grown Thylacine (except the stripes),SO, what exactly developed because of adaptation or convergent evolution?
What were you driving at? What does the second clause in this sentence have to do with the first?
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 90 by The Elder, posted 12-26-2003 10:46 PM | | The Elder has not replied |
|
Coragyps
Member (Idle past 764 days) Posts: 5553 From: Snyder, Texas, USA Joined: 11-12-2002
|
WK - I haven't been able to get on II lately, either. Maybe we should ask the IPU to miraculously intervene and restore it???
|
Coragyps
Member (Idle past 764 days) Posts: 5553 From: Snyder, Texas, USA Joined: 11-12-2002
|
Evolution means gradual and slow improvement via mutation. This process has no room for Genesis because of the eons and eons of time it requires AND because Genesis clearly says life was suddenly created by God.
"Gradual and slow improvement?" Why don't you at least get a clue what you're arguing against, WT? You've been around here long enough by now to no that none of us atheistic fiends, despite our Godsensectomies, are so ignorant of the findings of biology as to think that evolution is about "improvement!" It's about change to get by under the current conditions - no teleology there at all. And what Genesis "clearly says" about quite a few things has long since been shown not to be in agreement with physical reality - if "life was suddenly created" it sure left a peculiar multi-million year record of that suddenness.
|
™ Version 4.2