Hi, Jeremy, welcome to EvC.
Now, as far as evolution is concerned. . . The idea that there were simple life forms that developed into complex ones is very far fetched indeed. But the idea that the whole entire universe, in terms of atoms, quarks, neutrons, protons, etc, just happened and everything in it works in such a fine fashion, that even quarks never fail or malfunction on their own, is preposterous. It's estimated that if one atom was completely taken apart, all at once, the energy released would be enough to completely destroy any city on earth, flatten it to the ground. The mystery of evolution to me is not the primordial "soup." It is the big bang theory. That all the particles in the universe obey the laws of physics and relate to each other in such perfect harmony. That is a mystery that someone needs to explain to me. Evolution doesn't explain that paradox, intelligent design. . . consider
I'd like to suggest that you think through what you are posting a bit more before you throw it out there.
This "paragraph" has a bit of a hodge-podge of stuff in it. The comment about the energy in an atom, for example, doesn't appear to have anything to do with anything else in the paragraph. Nor is it obvious to me that it furthers whatever point you are trying to make.
There is another thing you should note: the word "evolution" has some colloquial english meanings. In the contest of the discussion here it if you don't add some modifier in front then it is taken to mean "biological evolution". This is the topic that is discussed under the term "darwinism" or "neo darwinism". Biological evolution has
nothing whatsoever to do with the big bang or origin of life. It is only, as the name points out, discussing how
living things change over time.