Menachem
inkorrekt writes:
Intelligent Design. If you can understand intelligence and Design, then you have the answer. IN simple words, whatever cannot self assemble or self synthesize is the work of an intelligent designer
sidelined writes:
Then we shall admit that the intelligent designer is therefore subject to the same rule? In other words an intelligent designer is also the result of intelligent design correct?
Menachem writes:
The Creator is Intelligent Design. There is none like Him.
It is quite stunninng how you managed to neither answer the question nor engage in debate. Where did the creator come from Menachem? It is a simple question.
Since the premise is that complex things
must have been designed and,as it also follows,that the designer must itself be of greater complexity than that which it designed the question remains where did the Intelligent Designer come from?
You could say that the Intelligent Designer{or creator in your case} self assembled but then you must explain how such is possible if there was nothing to assemble from. If there was something to assemble from we are again left with the difficulty of explaining what designed that something and we again face a paradox.
You could say that the intelligent designer was its own creator but what does this mean? Whence came its intelligence we ask and again we are left with a vacuuous knowledge because we have waffled on the answer. Indeed such a statement is not an answer at all but an unsupportable declaration made to avoid the issue. Ganz Falsch Menachem.
I humbly submit to you sir, the question once again. What designed the Intelligent Designer?
This message has been edited by sidelined, Wed, 2006-02-08 07:15 AM
But I realize now that these people were not in science; they didn’t understand it. They didn’t understand technology; they didn’t understand their time.
™ Version 4.2