About God and religious compadability with evolution, I agree with what Asgara and jar said.
As for the missing links, just because we have not reconstructed EVERY single evolutionary path of EVERY single creature on Earth (and we may very well NEVER be able to do so), does not mean that the theory as a whole is incorrect. We state gravity as a law, despite the fact that we have yet to visit EVERY body in space to check if it exhibits gravitational properties. And even if we were to find ALL the evidence, Creationists/ID Theorists would STILL claim they wanted to see the missing link, whether it existed or not. It's quite simple actually: a lack of evidence for is not evidence against.
Evolution is the same way. Just because we don't have ALL the evidence at hand, does not mean that the evidence we do have is insufficient to form a theory. If I am correct, Darwin formed his theory on evolution mostly by looking at LIVING creatures (remember the finches?) and only the occasional fossil.
And what are these "ape-men" to which you refer? There are no such thing. Neanderthals have been found, as have other "pre-homo sapien" "missing links." Not to mention those fossils found for other animals.
And read my signature about Darwin coming to the conclusion AFTER looking at the evidence. Darwin's presupposition was as a Christian.
Trék
In considering the Origin of Species, it is quite conceivable that a naturalist... might come to the conclusion that each species had not been independently created, but had descended, like varieties, from other species. - Charles Darwin
On the Origin of Species