Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
1 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,901 Year: 4,158/9,624 Month: 1,029/974 Week: 356/286 Day: 12/65 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Political Identity Crisis
SuperNintendo Chalmers
Member (Idle past 5863 days)
Posts: 772
From: Bartlett, IL, USA
Joined: 12-27-2005


Message 40 of 153 (281950)
01-27-2006 10:23 AM
Reply to: Message 39 by crashfrog
01-27-2006 10:10 AM


Re: bottom line for me...
IMO, the lack of universal health care is the biggest problem in the USA. Thousands die EVERY MONTH because of inadequate or non-existant health care yet all we here about is terrorism, the drug war, etc.
Far more people die EVERY YEAR (and probably every month) than have been killed by terrorism in the entire history of the United States. Yet we waste all our tax money on the military (I do a lot of govt. contracting, so I know exactly how wasteful the govt. (esp. military) is) when our own health care system is a much bigger danger.
Personal health care savings accounts are a joke that won't help anyone except those who can already afford health insurance.
HEALTH CARE IS ALREADY TAX DEDUCTIBLE!!! and people STILL can't afford it.
Ok, I will now step off my soap box.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 39 by crashfrog, posted 01-27-2006 10:10 AM crashfrog has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 41 by crashfrog, posted 01-27-2006 11:49 AM SuperNintendo Chalmers has not replied
 Message 43 by randman, posted 01-27-2006 12:11 PM SuperNintendo Chalmers has replied

  
SuperNintendo Chalmers
Member (Idle past 5863 days)
Posts: 772
From: Bartlett, IL, USA
Joined: 12-27-2005


Message 94 of 153 (282651)
01-30-2006 4:12 PM
Reply to: Message 43 by randman
01-27-2006 12:11 PM


Re: bottom line for me...
Would government-funded insurance cover that?
Probably not, but maybe....I don't trust putting the government in charge myself.
What I am in favor of is a single payer system for some basic level (but not too basic) of health coverage. Those that can afford it would still be free to purchase their own additional health insurance or services.
Basically everyone would be covered with decent insurance and those that want more can pay for it.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 43 by randman, posted 01-27-2006 12:11 PM randman has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 95 by randman, posted 01-30-2006 4:59 PM SuperNintendo Chalmers has replied

  
SuperNintendo Chalmers
Member (Idle past 5863 days)
Posts: 772
From: Bartlett, IL, USA
Joined: 12-27-2005


Message 96 of 153 (282667)
01-30-2006 5:06 PM
Reply to: Message 95 by randman
01-30-2006 4:59 PM


Re: bottom line for me...
Well Rand,
The govt. certainly shouldn't cover everything (I'm sure we agree on that).... For example, cosmetic surgery, cosmetic orthodontia, etc. etc. should be elective and paid for through private funds or insurance.
Of course the trick is to figure out what to cover... but the insurance companies don't seem to have a problem coming up with lists of covered things, so it can't be that hard.
We really need a single payer system at some level because it is the most efficient (economies of scale) AND health care is really the most effective when everyone is covered. Every single uninsured person increases health care costs for those of us who are covered.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 95 by randman, posted 01-30-2006 4:59 PM randman has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024