We have scientists and other extremely intelligent people.
We have a theory they came up with.
We have "something that in very few instances in nature is beneficial and that has never yielded a product that is different in scientific classification besides in species", that this theory is based on.
i suggest breaking that last point up into two or three:
We have "something that in very few instances in nature is beneficial."
and that it "has never yielded a product that is different in scientific classification besides in species",
and this theory is based on it.
This message has been edited by arachnophilia, 10-13-2005 04:17 PM
no i thought it was pretty straightforward. though most people normally transliterate "eretz" with an e. do you read, or are you faking it? it'd be nice to have someone on the board who can actually read fluently.
This message has been edited by arachnophilia, 02-02-2006 05:56 PM
I have understanding - not from humans - from the Elohim. Woh, the amount of times I wish I didn't know what I know. It is not easy to know, it seems much easier not knowing.