It's fun to watch Rob and NJ 'defend' Behe by conceding the point.
NJ: No matter what Behe says, whether he tries to accomodate the opposition or not, he will inevitably be in the same boat in their eyes.
You bet. And here's the boat: Behe wants a nonscientific point of view accepted as science.
Behe knows it doesn't qualify. He admitted in the Dover trial that ID has the same claim to scientific validity as astrology. He admitted that the definition of 'science' would have to be rewritten for ID to get in the door--and that astrology would be walking in on its arm.
You've stated exactly what Barbara Forrester means when she calls ID 'Creationism's Trojan Horse.' It is a nonscientific proposition dressed up in "accommodating language" in the hope no one will notice the difference between scientific patter and scientific substance.
Stephen knew the difference. He smoked the pseudoscience out of its horse.
___
Edited by Archer Opterix, : brev.
Archer
All species are transitional.