Summations Only

Fallacious analogy. The right woul be: If all cars are "intelligent" Laborginis are also "intelligent". You accuse me i play semantic games, but it is you which avoids to face the real issue and state if you see or not any intelligence (according to my own definition) in nature. I am waiting.Edited by zi ko, : No reason given.

So don't you think it would be usefull if , instead of arguing about semantics and accusing others of doing so, you could answer the topic question (according to my own definition of inelligence)?

Don't you think decision making and information processing are intelligent acts (according to my own definition of intelligence)? Or at least say straightly whatyou think they are .

The same as Darwin's and through random or somehow by information directed mutations and other types of genome reactions and natural selection.

I never have said that. What i am saying is that light in special situations can affect genome.

Really? I quote: Edited by zi ko, : No reason given.

Isn't it an examble of intelligence ? (according to my own definition and Swain, Buhler, Shapiro work.)--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This is the beggining of intelligence{ according to my definition)--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I agree ebout evidence, but about rationale i doupt. Have you read my work? (http://www.sleepgadgetabs.com)

No there isn't such link. Sorry.

Probably you find useful what i am saying about this division in my work on neurgenic evolution.(http://www.sleepgadgedabs.com).
I quote:
At this level all mentioned studies, show that there is a mechanism of information transfer from external or internal (somatic) environment to genome area. Otherwise how chicken could feel stress and how this stress could get known by genome so t o create the instinct of foraging? Also how, in Baldwin effect, could offspring learn new skills? From Wikipedia I quote: The paper (by Baldwin) proposed a mechanism for specific selection for general learning ability. Selected offspring would tend to have an increased capacity for learning new skills rather than being confined to genetically coded, relatively fixed abilities. In effect, it places emphasis on the fact that the sustained behavior of a species or group can shape the evolution of that.
These skills have to be learnt by other animals. How could that be done, or how in the first place these new skills could ever be learnt? Obviously this mechanism is served by neural tissue. It is almost self evident......
I think we are ultimately obliged to put in the picture the neural system, as it’s known properties as a messenger, makes it the best choice among other tissues. The somatic/germline division in metazoa calls for a mechanism that connects these two.....
I think it is a functional extension and complementary to genome. It has some of the properties of DNA, as f.e to inherit its contents, and get involved in evolution process or even direct evolution. I think it is a functional extension and complementary to genome. It has some of the properties of DNA, as f.e to inherit its contents, and get involved in evolution process or even direct evolution.

I agree. But my assumptions seem to give rational answers of how instincts were formed,it fills the gap between somatic cells and germline, it explains i my opinion the facts of micro and macroevolution, it fits well with geological findings,e,c.t.Edited by zi ko, : No reason given.

Specially if i dont agree with what you. plain logic!

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
rocs and clouds are subjected to physical laws. This makes them arudimentary intelligent, not in the way you percieve it.

I am an evolutionist.But instinct being a fix inherited pattern of behaviour? How did evolute? By random mutations?All fine grades of instinct behaviour needed different mutations?
I never said or imply" innate intelligence" replaces God.What i say is :
information driven evolution through neural system, together with random mutations,natual selection combined with nature's strive for life and innate intelligence based on physical and chemical laws (and so diffused and rudimentary) lead to new species appearance. W.K has spoted this gap in somatic cells and germline division in message 219Edited by zi ko, : No reason given.Edited by zi ko, : No reason given.